The comparison between short-term fertilization and conventional fertilization in in vitro fertilization treatment: a propensity score matching study.
- 1Department of Reproductive Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
- 2Department of Clinical Laboratory, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Abstract
Short-term IVF (S-IVF) is a fertilization approach to co-incubate the sperm and oocyte for a short duration and denude the cumulus cells afterwards. The S-IVF combined with early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) strategy can reduce the occurrence of both total fertilization failure (TFF) and the lower fertilization rate (<30%). However, there is still no consensus regarding the use of S-IVF. This study aimed to compare short-term in vitro fertilization (S-IVF) with conventional in vitro fertilization (C-IVF) in terms of fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to construct a 1:5 cohort of S-IVF and C-IVF cycles and compared fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. We screened 68 S-IVF and 340 C-IVF patients (each in their first ART cycle-so cycle and patient numbers are identical) by baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the fertilization rate, and the secondary outcomes were the pregnancy rate and abortion rate in cohort. The results showed that the C-IVF group had a higher fertilization rate [84% vs. 78%, p < 0.05], two-pronucleus (2PN) rate [67% vs. 60%, p < 0.05], and one-pronucleus (1PN) rate [5% vs. 3%, p < 0.05] compared with the S-IVF group. Furthermore, in the C-IVF group, the zero-pronucleus (0PN) rate was lower than in the S-IVF group (11% vs. 20%, mean difference -9 percentage points, 95% CI -12.5 to -5.5, p < 0.001). The good-quality blastocyst rate was numerically higher in the C-IVF group than in the S-IVF group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate or abortion rate in cohort between the two groups (early abortion rate among clinical pregnancies: 15.1% [14/93] in C-IVF versus 13.0% [3/23] in S-IVF, p = 1.000). In conclusion, C-IVF had a higher fertilization rate, 2PN rate, and 1PN rate but a lower 0PN rate compared with S-IVF, while there was no difference in embryo development and clinical outcomes.
Related
- Survival and treatment selection in NUT carcinoma: a population-based study and propensity score-matched comparison with poorly differentiated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
- Comparison of Survival After Radical Hysterectomy or Radical Radiotherapy Among Patients with Different Histological Types of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Analysis of SEER Data Using Propensity Score Matching
- Tralokinumab Versus Dupilumab for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis with Moderate-to-Severe Hand Involvement: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
- Maternal exposure to PM2.5 and its components and risk of small for gestational age in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a propensity score-matched case-control study in Guangzhou, China.
- Propensity Score Matching Unmasks Core Predictors of Psychosis Conversion in Clinical High-Risk Individuals
BibTeX
@article{han2026comparison,
title = {{The comparison between short-term fertilization and conventional fertilization in in vitro fertilization treatment: a propensity score matching study.}},
author = {Dong Han and Xueying Kong and Jie Liu and Yan Zhou and Shiping Chen and Xiaomiao Zhao and Caixia Liu and Chaofan Zhang},
journal = {Frontiers in endocrinology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fendo.2026.1801741},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908781},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The comparison between short-term fertilization and conventional fertilization in in vitro fertilization treatment: a propensity score matching study.
AU - Dong Han
AU - Xueying Kong
AU - Jie Liu
AU - Yan Zhou
AU - Shiping Chen
AU - Xiaomiao Zhao
AU - Caixia Liu
AU - Chaofan Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - Frontiers in endocrinology
DO - 10.3389/fendo.2026.1801741
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908781
AB - Short-term IVF (S-IVF) is a fertilization approach to co-incubate the sperm and oocyte for a short duration and denude the cumulus cells afterwards. The S-IVF combined with early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) strategy can reduce the occurrence of both total fertilization failure (TFF) and the lower fertilization rate (<30%). However, there is still no consensus regarding the use of S-IVF. This study aimed to compare short-term in vitro fertilization (S-IVF) with conventional in vitro fertilization (C-IVF) in terms of fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to construct a 1:5 cohort of S-IVF and C-IVF cycles and compared fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. We screened 68 S-IVF and 340 C-IVF patients (each in their first ART cycle-so cycle and patient numbers are identical) by baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the fertilization rate, and the secondary outcomes were the pregnancy rate and abortion rate in cohort. The results showed that the C-IVF group had a higher fertilization rate [84% vs. 78%, p < 0.05], two-pronucleus (2PN) rate [67% vs. 60%, p < 0.05], and one-pronucleus (1PN) rate [5% vs. 3%, p < 0.05] compared with the S-IVF group. Furthermore, in the C-IVF group, the zero-pronucleus (0PN) rate was lower than in the S-IVF group (11% vs. 20%, mean difference -9 percentage points, 95% CI -12.5 to -5.5, p < 0.001). The good-quality blastocyst rate was numerically higher in the C-IVF group than in the S-IVF group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate or abortion rate in cohort between the two groups (early abortion rate among clinical pregnancies: 15.1% [14/93] in C-IVF versus 13.0% [3/23] in S-IVF, p = 1.000). In conclusion, C-IVF had a higher fertilization rate, 2PN rate, and 1PN rate but a lower 0PN rate compared with S-IVF, while there was no difference in embryo development and clinical outcomes.
SN - 1664-2392
ER -