Toward naturalistic reaching: Intermediate reaches under uncertainty generalize to walking, but are not obligatory
- 1University of Salzburg
Abstract
Highly-constrained laboratory-based experiments have provided important insights into movement planning. When people reach toward one of several stimuli before knowing which to target, their hand trajectories are situated intermediate to direct reaches to each stimulus. Real-world reaching, however, involves a greater decision landscape than typical laboratory tasks. We extended the go-before-you-know paradigm to a walk-to-reach task resembling unconstrained natural behavior. Participants walked three steps toward a touchscreen before reaching for one of two stimuli, marked as the target either at walk onset or after reach onset. Under uncertainty, intermediate reaches occurred, but only for some stimulus layouts and participants. Individual reaches varied considerably; many directly targeted one stimulus and corrected late. Body position at reach onset was anchored to the screen more than the stimuli and was partly intermediate. Thus, intermediate movements generalize beyond the laboratory, but as one flexible strategy among several, not as obligatory motor plan averaging.
Related
- Do Classical Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off Models Generalize to Lower Limb Movements?
- The Hill numbers synthesize and generalize measures of trait polygenicity
- Movement refinement and cholinergic regulation of outcome-dependent updating during skilled reaching.
- Quantifying the Effect of Trunk Postural Control on Reaching with Progressive Shoulder Abduction Loading in Hemiparetic Stroke
- An Engineering Explanation of Human Vertical Reaching: Optimal Trajectory Planning of Asymmetric Velocity Profiles in the Vertical Plane via a Softplus-Based Generalized Dynamic Jerk Cost Function.
BibTeX
@misc{seavey2026toward,
title = {{Toward naturalistic reaching: Intermediate reaches under uncertainty generalize to walking, but are not obligatory}},
author = {C. V. Seavey and C. Seegelke and D. F. Cooke and D. S. Marigold and T. Heed},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.21.760749},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.760749v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Toward naturalistic reaching: Intermediate reaches under uncertainty generalize to walking, but are not obligatory
AU - C. V. Seavey
AU - C. Seegelke
AU - D. F. Cooke
AU - D. S. Marigold
AU - T. Heed
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.21.760749
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.760749v1
AB - Highly-constrained laboratory-based experiments have provided important insights into movement planning. When people reach toward one of several stimuli before knowing which to target, their hand trajectories are situated intermediate to direct reaches to each stimulus. Real-world reaching, however, involves a greater decision landscape than typical laboratory tasks. We extended the go-before-you-know paradigm to a walk-to-reach task resembling unconstrained natural behavior. Participants walked three steps toward a touchscreen before reaching for one of two stimuli, marked as the target either at walk onset or after reach onset. Under uncertainty, intermediate reaches occurred, but only for some stimulus layouts and participants. Individual reaches varied considerably; many directly targeted one stimulus and corrected late. Body position at reach onset was anchored to the screen more than the stimuli and was partly intermediate. Thus, intermediate movements generalize beyond the laboratory, but as one flexible strategy among several, not as obligatory motor plan averaging.
ER -