Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Neurologia medico-chirurgica

Comparative Analysis between Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion for Cervical Spinal Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
  3. 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea
  4. 4Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Myongji University, Yongin, Republic of Korea

Abstract

This retrospective study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of vertebral body sliding osteotomy (n = 26) and anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (n = 17) in 43 patients with K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Within this cohort, the vertebral body sliding osteotomy group was associated with shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) and greater postoperative Visual Analog Scale improvement (p = 0.048). While the anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion group achieved significantly larger immediate postoperative segmental lordosis correction, no significant difference was observed between groups in the long-term maintenance of overall segmental alignment. However, subgroup analysis suggested that in patients experiencing postoperative kyphotic progression, vertebral body sliding osteotomy was associated with less subsequent loss of segmental lordosis correction compared to anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (p = 0.021). Both techniques effectively achieved decompression for K-line negative ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, with similar safety profiles and equivalent fusion rates. These preliminary findings suggest that vertebral body sliding osteotomy may be considered a potentially viable alternative to anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion, offering comparable outcomes and potential merits in early recovery and alignment maintenance for select patients.

Related

  1. Effects of vertebral shortening during corrective osteotomy for spinal deformity on spinal cord biomechanics and cerebrospinal fluid-anterior spinal artery fluid-structure interaction
    Alimujiang Yusufu, Abudula Abulaiti, Abuduwupuer Haibier +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefDOAJ
  2. Posterior circumferential decompression for multilevel thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a case report and literature review.
    Lei Ren, Hongju Liu, Chuiguo Sun +3
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Central adiposity is associated with the severity and multiligamentous involvement of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Huohuo Xue, Tsutomu Endo, Yoshinao Koike +11
    JBMR plusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  4. Comparative Study between Evans Calcaneal Osteotomy and Medial Sliding Osteotomy in Adolescents with Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot Deformity
    Ahmed Morssy, Ahmed Sakr, Moawed El-Adawy +1
    The Egyptian Orthopaedic JournalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  5. Evaluating large language models in patient education: a comparative analysis addressing frequently asked questions in peri-acetabular osteotomy
    TP Davis, B Guevel, K Logishetty +2
    Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{yang2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Analysis between Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion for Cervical Spinal Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament}},
  author = {Chan Yang NOH and Jin Hoon PARK and Sang Ryong JEON and Sun Woo JANG and Chongman KIM and Danbi PARK and Sang Hoon HWANG and Min Han KIM},
  journal = {Neurologia medico-chirurgica},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.2176/jns-nmc.2026-0037},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2026-0037},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Analysis between Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion for Cervical Spinal Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
AU  - Chan Yang NOH
AU  - Jin Hoon PARK
AU  - Sang Ryong JEON
AU  - Sun Woo JANG
AU  - Chongman KIM
AU  - Danbi PARK
AU  - Sang Hoon HWANG
AU  - Min Han KIM
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
JO  - Neurologia medico-chirurgica
DO  - 10.2176/jns-nmc.2026-0037
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2026-0037
AB  - This retrospective study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of vertebral body sliding osteotomy (n = 26) and anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (n = 17) in 43 patients with K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Within this cohort, the vertebral body sliding osteotomy group was associated with shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) and greater postoperative Visual Analog Scale improvement (p = 0.048). While the anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion group achieved significantly larger immediate postoperative segmental lordosis correction, no significant difference was observed between groups in the long-term maintenance of overall segmental alignment. However, subgroup analysis suggested that in patients experiencing postoperative kyphotic progression, vertebral body sliding osteotomy was associated with less subsequent loss of segmental lordosis correction compared to anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (p = 0.021). Both techniques effectively achieved decompression for K-line negative ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, with similar safety profiles and equivalent fusion rates. These preliminary findings suggest that vertebral body sliding osteotomy may be considered a potentially viable alternative to anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion, offering comparable outcomes and potential merits in early recovery and alignment maintenance for select patients.
SN  - 0470-8105
SN  - 1349-8029
ER  -