Foot Biomechanics, Body Composition, and Sex‐Related Factors Associated With Work‐Related Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Standing Assembly‐Line Workers: A Cross‐Sectional Study
- 1Universidad San Jorge Zaragoza Spain
- 2BSH‐EE Zaragoza Spain
- 3Hospital MAZ Zaragoza Spain
Abstract
Background: Prolonged standing is common in manufacturing and assembly‐line work and is associated with musculoskeletal discomfort, especially in the lower limbs and spine. The influence of foot posture, morphology, and plantar loading patterns on this discomfort remains unclear.
Objective: To analyze the associations between foot posture, plantar pressure, and 3D foot morphology with work‐related musculoskeletal discomfort in standing workers and to examine the role of BMI and the potential modifying role of sex.
Methods: A cross‐sectional study was conducted among 240 assembly‐line workers (129 women, 53.8%). Musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed using the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ). Foot posture (FPI‐6), baropodometry (FreeMed), and 3D foot morphology (DOMESCAN) were evaluated under standardized conditions. Participants were classified as having low (CMDQ ≤ 10) or moderate–high (≥ 11) discomfort. Firth‐penalized logistic regression analyzed associations between overall CMDQ discomfort, foot posture, sex, and BMI, including an FPI × sex interaction term.
Results: All workers reported at least one musculoskeletal discomfort response, with the feet, neck, and lumbar region accounting for the largest proportions of reported discomfort. Among women, pronated foot posture was associated with higher odds of moderate–high overall CMDQ discomfort (OR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.10–7.28). Overweight/obesity status was associated with higher odds of foot and hip/gluteal discomfort, whereas, among women, pronated foot posture was associated with greater odds of lumbar discomfort. The pronation–discomfort association was stronger in women and attenuated in men.
Conclusions: Among women, pronated foot posture was associated with greater overall work‐related musculoskeletal discomfort during prolonged standing and with greater odds of lumbar discomfort, whereas overweight/obesity status was associated with greater odds of foot and hip/gluteal discomfort. The pronation–discomfort association was attenuated in men. From an occupational‐health perspective, incorporating foot‐posture and BMI assessment into ergonomic evaluations may help identify workers who could benefit from more individualized preventive strategies, particularly women with pronated feet.
Related
- Mus siliconus: A Neuro-Musculoskeletal Digital Twin of the Mouse Integrating Neural Dynamics, Biomechanics, and Tactile Sensing
- Prevalence of and factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders among orthopedic nurses: a cross-sectional study with exploratory interpretable machine-learning modeling
- Factors Associated with Therapeutic Alliance Among Outpatient Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
- Physical contact in physical education for women: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of discomfort related to initiator gender, relationship with the initiator, and body region
- Musculoskeletal pain, functional impact, and associations with recorded sex in an adult sample from Mashhad, Iran: a cross-sectional secondary analysis
BibTeX
@article{almenararasanz2026foot,
title = {{Foot Biomechanics, Body Composition, and Sex‐Related Factors Associated With Work‐Related Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Standing Assembly‐Line Workers: A Cross‐Sectional Study}},
author = {Alejandro‐Jesús Almenar‐Arasanz and José‐Antonio Villalba‐Ruete and Elisa Bravo‐Viñuales and Ana Vanessa Bataller‐Cervero and Juan Rabal‐Pelay and Jacobo de‐Rentería‐de‐la‐Peña and Luis‐Enrique Roche‐Seruendo and Cristina Cimarras‐Otal},
journal = {Journal of Foot and Ankle Research},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/jfa2.70233},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70233},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Foot Biomechanics, Body Composition, and Sex‐Related Factors Associated With Work‐Related Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Standing Assembly‐Line Workers: A Cross‐Sectional Study
AU - Alejandro‐Jesús Almenar‐Arasanz
AU - José‐Antonio Villalba‐Ruete
AU - Elisa Bravo‐Viñuales
AU - Ana Vanessa Bataller‐Cervero
AU - Juan Rabal‐Pelay
AU - Jacobo de‐Rentería‐de‐la‐Peña
AU - Luis‐Enrique Roche‐Seruendo
AU - Cristina Cimarras‐Otal
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
DO - 10.1002/jfa2.70233
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70233
AB - Background: Prolonged standing is common in manufacturing and assembly‐line work and is associated with musculoskeletal discomfort, especially in the lower limbs and spine. The influence of foot posture, morphology, and plantar loading patterns on this discomfort remains unclear. Objective: To analyze the associations between foot posture, plantar pressure, and 3D foot morphology with work‐related musculoskeletal discomfort in standing workers and to examine the role of BMI and the potential modifying role of sex. Methods: A cross‐sectional study was conducted among 240 assembly‐line workers (129 women, 53.8%). Musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed using the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ). Foot posture (FPI‐6), baropodometry (FreeMed), and 3D foot morphology (DOMESCAN) were evaluated under standardized conditions. Participants were classified as having low (CMDQ ≤ 10) or moderate–high (≥ 11) discomfort. Firth‐penalized logistic regression analyzed associations between overall CMDQ discomfort, foot posture, sex, and BMI, including an FPI × sex interaction term. Results: All workers reported at least one musculoskeletal discomfort response, with the feet, neck, and lumbar region accounting for the largest proportions of reported discomfort. Among women, pronated foot posture was associated with higher odds of moderate–high overall CMDQ discomfort (OR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.10–7.28). Overweight/obesity status was associated with higher odds of foot and hip/gluteal discomfort, whereas, among women, pronated foot posture was associated with greater odds of lumbar discomfort. The pronation–discomfort association was stronger in women and attenuated in men. Conclusions: Among women, pronated foot posture was associated with greater overall work‐related musculoskeletal discomfort during prolonged standing and with greater odds of lumbar discomfort, whereas overweight/obesity status was associated with greater odds of foot and hip/gluteal discomfort. The pronation–discomfort association was attenuated in men. From an occupational‐health perspective, incorporating foot‐posture and BMI assessment into ergonomic evaluations may help identify workers who could benefit from more individualized preventive strategies, particularly women with pronated feet.
SN - 1757-1146
ER -