Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Not comparing like with like: a measurement-conditions audit of the solid polymer electrolyte literature

  1. 1Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, India, 400076

Abstract

Ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are routinely compared across publications as though they were measured the same way. We tested that assumption by building a measurement-conditions annotation layer over the largest open compilation of SPE conductivity data (16,009 measurements from 214 source papers), recording for each source study how the measurement was actually made. Fifty-eight papers spanning 1986–2020 and 20 journals were annotated across 59 fields, covering 11,394 measurements, or 71.2% of the compilation. Every condition was extracted twice independently and all substantive disagreements were adjudicated against the source PDFs. Three findings follow. First, 22.5% of the compilation’s measurements come from systems containing no polymer at all—salts in molecular solvents or ionic liquids, classified from the declared composition alone. These sit a median 2.6 orders of magnitude above solvent-free SPEs while being measured 35 řC cooler, and they inflate any pooled statistic drawn from the dataset. Second, refitting each formulation’s temperature series and extrapolating to 25 řC shows that among genuinely solvent-free polymer electrolytes, 50.1% reach 10−4 S cm−1 at the temperature reported but only 3.4% do so at 25 řC, a median loss of 2.54 orders; 97.5% of their best-reported values are taken at ≥60 řC. Pooling classes understates this attrition because liquid systems barely lose anything on cooling. Third, the conditions needed to reproduce or even recompute a conductivity are frequently absent: film thickness is not recoverable for 60.7% of papers, electrode area for 68.4%, per-point equilibration time for 77.2%, and only 5 of 57 papers report a measured residual water content.

Related

  1. Flash Production of High-Purity V3.5+ Electrolyte via Electron Beam-Induced Radiolysis Under Ambient Conditions
    Pengfei Zheng, Qinqin Xiang, Zhiwen Jiang +4
    Angewandte Chemie International EditionPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textInorganic & organometallic chemistryHAL
  2. Fluorine-Free Gas Diffusion Media for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells Part I: Silicone-based Microporous Layers
    Irene Sinisgalli, Nicolaas J. M. van Leth, Antoni Forner-Cuenca
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  3. PolyGPT: A Decoder-Only Transformer for Polymer Electrolyte Design
    Tanmay Sarkar Akash, Siddhartha Das
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryCondensed matterarXiv
  4. A High-Performance Sustainable Solid-State Supercapacitor Utilizing Hazelnut Shell-Derived Activated Carbon and Optimized Polymer Blend Electrolyte
    Khadidja Boukhouidem, Theodore Azemtsop Manfo, Mustafa Ergin Şahın +5
    Chinese Journal of Chemical EngineeringPeer-reviewedCC BY10 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  5. Prototype-guided transfer of sparse literature knowledge for electrolyte additive discovery
    Weixiang Hong, Hongting Du, Jiayue Tang +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chaudhari2026comparing,
  title = {{Not comparing like with like: a measurement-conditions audit of the solid polymer electrolyte literature}},
  author = {Om Chaudhari},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15009216/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009216/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Not comparing like with like: a measurement-conditions audit of the solid polymer electrolyte literature
AU  - Om Chaudhari
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15009216/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009216/v1
AB  - Ionic conductivities of solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are routinely compared across publications as though they were measured the same way. We tested that assumption by building a measurement-conditions annotation layer over the largest open compilation of SPE conductivity data (16,009 measurements from 214 source papers), recording for each source study how the measurement was actually made. Fifty-eight papers spanning 1986–2020 and 20 journals were annotated across 59 fields, covering 11,394 measurements, or 71.2% of the compilation. Every condition was extracted twice independently and all substantive disagreements were adjudicated against the source PDFs. Three findings follow. First, 22.5% of the compilation’s measurements come from systems containing no polymer at all—salts in molecular solvents or ionic liquids, classified from the declared composition alone. These sit a median 2.6 orders of magnitude above solvent-free SPEs while being measured 35 řC cooler, and they inflate any pooled statistic drawn from the dataset. Second, refitting each formulation’s temperature series and extrapolating to 25 řC shows that among genuinely solvent-free polymer electrolytes, 50.1% reach 10−4 S cm−1 at the temperature reported but only 3.4% do so at 25 řC, a median loss of 2.54 orders; 97.5% of their best-reported values are taken at ≥60 řC. Pooling classes understates this attrition because liquid systems barely lose anything on cooling. Third, the conditions needed to reproduce or even recompute a conductivity are frequently absent: film thickness is not recoverable for 60.7% of papers, electrode area for 68.4%, per-point equilibration time for 77.2%, and only 5 of 57 papers report a measured residual water content.
ER  -