Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ESMO Open

Personalized medicine, scientific revolution or self-serving illusion: viewpoint from EORTC-PAMM Group

Abstract

Personalized medicine has redefined oncology by tailoring treatments to molecular and clinical characteristics. However, despite remarkable advances in biomarker discovery and targeted therapy, the integration of pharmacological principles into precision oncology remains limited. The resulting discrepancy between biological innovation and therapeutic optimization contributes to high attrition rates in drug development, inconsistent real world efficacy, and escalating financial toxicity. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms Group explored how pharmacology can bridge the gap between molecular precision and clinical reality. Although understanding mechanisms of action is a critical first step, the subsequent translation of this knowledge into individualized dosing and scheduling strategies and rational drug combinations is equally essential. Achieving this requires the use of quantitative tools, such as pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic modeling, therapeutic drug monitoring, and real-world evidence (RWE). These patient-centered approaches enable continuous learning from patient data, refine our understanding of exposure-response relationships, and support adaptive treatment strategies across diverse populations. We also discuss the rise of tumor-agnostic approvals, which transcend histological boundaries yet expose disparities in national regulatory and reimbursement frameworks. Ensuring equitable access to mechanism-driven therapies requires harmonized policies integrating pharmacological, clinical, and ethical perspectives. True personalization in oncology requires moving beyond target selection to delivering the right dose to the right patient at the right time. Embedding holistic pharmacology approaches into the design evaluation and post marketing use of anticancer therapies will improve efficacy minimize toxicity and promote value-based care. Integrating mechanistic understanding with quantitative pharmacology and RWE represents the next frontier of precision oncology transforming innovation into sustainable patient-centered benefit pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling precision oncology real-world evidence therapeutic drug monitoring tumor-agnostic therapy.

Related

  1. Medicine's Unfinished Revolution. Part 1-The Case for Change: Systems Thinking and the Soul of Medicine.
    Joachim Sturmberg
    Journal of evaluation in clinical practicePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  2. Evolution of Precision Oncology, Personalized Medicine, and Molecular Tumor Boards
    Yu Fujiwara, Shumei Kato, Razelle Kurzrock
    Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North AmericaPeer-reviewedLicence not stated20 citedOncologyOpenAlex
  3. Theratyping for personalized medicine across cystic fibrosis disease models
    Valentino Bezzerri, Tarini Gunawardena, Tanja Gonska +6
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefPMCEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Unsupervised clustering of concurrent constitutions in traditional Chinese medicine for personalized treatment
    Guangxiang Jiang, Yixing Liu, Dongran Han
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. Personalized Cardiac Rehabilitation: Integrating Biomarker-Guided, Technology-Enabled, and Population-Specific Strategies in Exercise Medicine.
    Tong Liu, Yuting Xia, Li Wei
    Cardiology research and practicePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{debien2026personalized,
  title = {{Personalized medicine, scientific revolution or self-serving illusion: viewpoint from EORTC-PAMM Group}},
  author = {V. Debien and A. Geraud-Cremieux and M. Le Grand and D. Carbone and I. Garajova and C. Pecoraro and E. Pasquier and G.J. Peters and E. Giovannetti and M. Centanni and J. Ciccolini},
  journal = {ESMO Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108576},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05849880v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Personalized medicine, scientific revolution or self-serving illusion: viewpoint from EORTC-PAMM Group
AU  - V. Debien
AU  - A. Geraud-Cremieux
AU  - M. Le Grand
AU  - D. Carbone
AU  - I. Garajova
AU  - C. Pecoraro
AU  - E. Pasquier
AU  - G.J. Peters
AU  - E. Giovannetti
AU  - M. Centanni
AU  - J. Ciccolini
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - ESMO Open
DO  - 10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108576
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05849880v1
AB  - Personalized medicine has redefined oncology by tailoring treatments to molecular and clinical characteristics. However, despite remarkable advances in biomarker discovery and targeted therapy, the integration of pharmacological principles into precision oncology remains limited. The resulting discrepancy between biological innovation and therapeutic optimization contributes to high attrition rates in drug development, inconsistent real world efficacy, and escalating financial toxicity. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms Group explored how pharmacology can bridge the gap between molecular precision and clinical reality. Although understanding mechanisms of action is a critical first step, the subsequent translation of this knowledge into individualized dosing and scheduling strategies and rational drug combinations is equally essential. Achieving this requires the use of quantitative tools, such as pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic modeling, therapeutic drug monitoring, and real-world evidence (RWE). These patient-centered approaches enable continuous learning from patient data, refine our understanding of exposure-response relationships, and support adaptive treatment strategies across diverse populations. We also discuss the rise of tumor-agnostic approvals, which transcend histological boundaries yet expose disparities in national regulatory and reimbursement frameworks. Ensuring equitable access to mechanism-driven therapies requires harmonized policies integrating pharmacological, clinical, and ethical perspectives. True personalization in oncology requires moving beyond target selection to delivering the right dose to the right patient at the right time. Embedding holistic pharmacology approaches into the design evaluation and post marketing use of anticancer therapies will improve efficacy minimize toxicity and promote value-based care. Integrating mechanistic understanding with quantitative pharmacology and RWE represents the next frontier of precision oncology transforming innovation into sustainable patient-centered benefit pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling precision oncology real-world evidence therapeutic drug monitoring tumor-agnostic therapy.
SN  - 2059-7029
ER  -