Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCChemRxiv

Breaking the Potency Barrier: A Practical Recipe for QSAR Extrapolation

Abstract

Predicting compounds that are more potent than those represented in the training data remains a difficult and practically important problem for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This challenge is particularly relevant during lead optimization, where the goal is to design or identify analogs that are more potent than compounds already measured. To address this problem, we developed a new Pairwise-Difference QSAR (PD-QSAR) approach that learns changes in biological activity from differences in molecular descriptors between compound pairs. We evaluated three strategies for aggregating the resulting PD-QSAR predictions: mean aggregation, k-nearest-neighbor aggregation (k = 3), and 10% quantile aggregation, and compared their performance with Direct QSAR and Chemprop using a benchmark derived from publicly available ChEMBL 35 data. The primary benchmark included 103 human single-protein target datasets, comprising 33,707 activity records. For each target, the 10% most potent activity records were withheld for external validation. Among the approaches evaluated, 10% quantile aggregation provided the lowest median external validation RMSE (0.518) and outperformed mean and kNN aggregation on external validation RMSE for 100 of 103 targets, Direct QSAR for 102 targets, and Chemprop for 94 targets. These results support PD-QSAR with quantile aggregation as a useful strategy for prioritizing analogs expected to extend beyond the potency range represented by previously measured compounds.

Related

  1. Breaking the Triple “Skeleton–Liquid Loading–Liquid Lock” Barrier: Research Progress and Integrated Prospects for Surfactants for Repairing Deep Natural Gas Reservoirs
    Dongxiao Xu, Dingfan Xue, Jingjing Jiang +4
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General chemistryCrossref
  2. Correlation-Energy Extrapolation within Shell-Nested Virtual Spaces
    Dariusz W. Szczepanik
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  3. Making Complete-Basis-Set Extrapolation Visible: A Spreadsheet-Based Activity for Upper-Division Computational Chemistry
    Olaseni Sode, Yong Ba
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  4. Lipid and Carbohydrate Modifications Enhance Potency of Antisense Oligonucleotides Targeting Oncogenic KRAS
    Faith Kivunga, Julien Verget, Helene Pereira +5
    Bioconjugate ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textProteomics & metabolomicsGeneral biologyHAL
  5. Quinoxaline-Triazole Hybrids: Exploring the Impact of Substituent Architecture on Cytotoxic Potency and Receptor Interaction.
    Bangar Reddy Vancha, Mandapalli Sreeshitha, Shaik Farheen Banu +7
    Chemistry & biodiversityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textOrganic chemistryEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{jain2026breaking,
  title = {{Breaking the Potency Barrier: A Practical Recipe for QSAR Extrapolation}},
  author = {Sankalp Jain and Alexey V. Zakharov},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15010567/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15010567/v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Breaking the Potency Barrier: A Practical Recipe for QSAR Extrapolation
AU  - Sankalp Jain
AU  - Alexey V. Zakharov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15010567/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15010567/v1
AB  - Predicting compounds that are more potent than those represented in the training data remains a difficult and practically important problem for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. This challenge is particularly relevant during lead optimization, where the goal is to design or identify analogs that are more potent than compounds already measured. To address this problem, we developed a new Pairwise-Difference QSAR (PD-QSAR) approach that learns changes in biological activity from differences in molecular descriptors between compound pairs. We evaluated three strategies for aggregating the resulting PD-QSAR predictions: mean aggregation, k-nearest-neighbor aggregation (k = 3), and 10% quantile aggregation, and compared their performance with Direct QSAR and Chemprop using a benchmark derived from publicly available ChEMBL 35 data. The primary benchmark included 103 human single-protein target datasets, comprising 33,707 activity records. For each target, the 10% most potent activity records were withheld for external validation. Among the approaches evaluated, 10% quantile aggregation provided the lowest median external validation RMSE (0.518) and outperformed mean and kNN aggregation on external validation RMSE for 100 of 103 targets, Direct QSAR for 102 targets, and Chemprop for 94 targets. These results support PD-QSAR with quantile aggregation as a useful strategy for prioritizing analogs expected to extend beyond the potency range represented by previously measured compounds.
ER  -