Ocularity modulates the dominance of spatial over temporal influences in binocular rivalry.
4 affiliations
- 1Clinical Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
- 2[email protected].
- 3[email protected].
- 4[email protected].
Abstract
The perception of a binocular rivalry (BR) stimulus can be influenced by other stimuli in temporal or spatial proximity. Here, we investigate how spatial (surround inhibition [SI]) and temporal context (flash suppression [FS]) interact. Previously, we modulated these influences by varying surround contrast in SI and timing parameters in FS. In the present study, we make use of the fact that the strengths of the two contexts can also be manipulated in the same way, namely by modulating ocularity. We varied FS strength by showing the prime to the same eye as the identical probe or to the other eye. Spatial influence was varied by presenting the surround to the same eye as the matching center, to the other eye, or to both. Temporal and spatial influences were mostly additive when biasing perception in the same direction. Some combinations were so strong that the dominant percept could be predicted almost perfectly. This may help in deliberately creating desired perceptual outcomes in future studies. Spatial context tended to dominate in conflicting situations. When both context types were presented interocularly (and presumably weaker), however, temporal context had the edge. This may reflect the unexpectedly strong interocular FS: the interocular constellation weakened FS much less than SI, suggesting differences in hierarchical processing levels. Thus, comparing interocular conditions may have been less informative than anticipated. Still, when the conflicting influences were both working intraocularly, spatial context dominated, consistent with previous findings.
Related
- Editorial: Neural mechanisms and clinical advances in binocular vision
- Cell-type specific inhibitory dynamics shape binocular response normalization in visual cortex
- Pathological suppression of binocular vision in stroke
- Selective binocular integration in mouse visual cortex: binocular but not monocular neurons respond distinctly to congruent stimuli
- Interocular suppression weakens binocular disparity integration in the dorsal visual stream
BibTeX
@article{beckmann2026ocularity,
title = {{Ocularity modulates the dominance of spatial over temporal influences in binocular rivalry.}},
author = {Lisa Beckmann and Thomas Schenk and Karin Ludwig},
journal = {Journal of vision},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1167/jov.26.10.9},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42852993},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Ocularity modulates the dominance of spatial over temporal influences in binocular rivalry.
AU - Lisa Beckmann
AU - Thomas Schenk
AU - Karin Ludwig
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of vision
DO - 10.1167/jov.26.10.9
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42852993
AB - The perception of a binocular rivalry (BR) stimulus can be influenced by other stimuli in temporal or spatial proximity. Here, we investigate how spatial (surround inhibition [SI]) and temporal context (flash suppression [FS]) interact. Previously, we modulated these influences by varying surround contrast in SI and timing parameters in FS. In the present study, we make use of the fact that the strengths of the two contexts can also be manipulated in the same way, namely by modulating ocularity. We varied FS strength by showing the prime to the same eye as the identical probe or to the other eye. Spatial influence was varied by presenting the surround to the same eye as the matching center, to the other eye, or to both. Temporal and spatial influences were mostly additive when biasing perception in the same direction. Some combinations were so strong that the dominant percept could be predicted almost perfectly. This may help in deliberately creating desired perceptual outcomes in future studies. Spatial context tended to dominate in conflicting situations. When both context types were presented interocularly (and presumably weaker), however, temporal context had the edge. This may reflect the unexpectedly strong interocular FS: the interocular constellation weakened FS much less than SI, suggesting differences in hierarchical processing levels. Thus, comparing interocular conditions may have been less informative than anticipated. Still, when the conflicting influences were both working intraocularly, spatial context dominated, consistent with previous findings.
SN - 1534-7362
ER -