Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Surgical Timing in Relation to Visual Dysfunction in Skull Base Meningiomas Involving the Anterior Visual Pathway: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Observation is generally recommended for asymptomatic meningiomas, but evidence from incidental meningiomas is derived largely from heterogeneous intracranial locations and may not directly apply to tumors involving the anterior visual pathway. We investigated whether preoperative visual status remained associated with postoperative visual function after adjustment for baseline clinical and anatomical differences in this location-specific subgroup. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 146 patients who underwent resection of skull base meningiomas contacting or compressing the optic nerve and/or chiasm. Preoperative visual status was categorized by comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation as normal visual function or visual dysfunction. The primary outcome was postoperative normal visual function, defined as preservation of normal vision in patients with normal preoperative visual function and complete recovery in those with preoperative visual dysfunction. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, and propensity score matching was conducted using age, sex, tumor volume, tumor laterality, and optic canal involvement. Results: Propensity score matching yielded 48 matched pairs with adequate balance across all measured covariates (all standardized mean differences < 0.1). Postoperative normal visual function was preserved or achieved in 95.8% of patients with normal preoperative visual function versus 31.3% of those with preoperative visual dysfunction (exact McNemar p < 0.001). Favorable visual outcome occurred in 95.8% versus 77.1%, respectively (p = 0.0225). Conclusions: Among surgically treated patients, normal preoperative visual function remained strongly associated with postoperative normal visual function after adjustment for measured clinical and anatomical differences. These findings do not establish that earlier surgery improves visual outcomes or define an optimal surgical timing strategy, but suggest that preoperative visual status and tumor anatomy should be considered in individualized management decisions.

Related

  1. Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to Anterior Cranial Base Meningiomas: Indications, Limitations, and Surgical Decision-Making.
    Manat Chopra, David John, David J Cote +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCCrossref
  2. A literature review of anatomical considerations and surgical approaches for planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas.
    Mariana Agudelo-Arrieta, Sergio Esteban Chacón-Valencia, Maria Isabel Ocampo-Navia +5
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Subjective Sleep Quality in Relation to Relapse Status in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Propensity Score—Matched Nested Case—Control Analysis
    Dimitar Taskov, Sonya Ivanova, Izabel Antova +4
    Neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Echinococcus granulosus Genotype and Surgical Outcomes After Cystic Echinococcosis Surgery: A Propensity-Score-Adjusted Retrospective Pilot Cohort Study
    Mehmet Kadir Bartın, Müge Kara
    Tropical medicine and infectious diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. The impact of histological subtype on positive surgical margins in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching (the MSUG 94 group)
    Suguru Oka, Koji Iinuma, Tomoki Taniguchi +11
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{kawamata2026surgical,
  title = {{Surgical Timing in Relation to Visual Dysfunction in Skull Base Meningiomas Involving the Anterior Visual Pathway: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis}},
  author = {Takakazu Kawamata and Seiichiro Eguchi and Shuhei Morita and Koji Yamaguchi and Kosaku Amano},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18203324},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3324},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Surgical Timing in Relation to Visual Dysfunction in Skull Base Meningiomas Involving the Anterior Visual Pathway: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
AU  - Takakazu Kawamata
AU  - Seiichiro Eguchi
AU  - Shuhei Morita
AU  - Koji Yamaguchi
AU  - Kosaku Amano
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18203324
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3324
AB  - Background/Objectives: Observation is generally recommended for asymptomatic meningiomas, but evidence from incidental meningiomas is derived largely from heterogeneous intracranial locations and may not directly apply to tumors involving the anterior visual pathway. We investigated whether preoperative visual status remained associated with postoperative visual function after adjustment for baseline clinical and anatomical differences in this location-specific subgroup. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 146 patients who underwent resection of skull base meningiomas contacting or compressing the optic nerve and/or chiasm. Preoperative visual status was categorized by comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation as normal visual function or visual dysfunction. The primary outcome was postoperative normal visual function, defined as preservation of normal vision in patients with normal preoperative visual function and complete recovery in those with preoperative visual dysfunction. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, and propensity score matching was conducted using age, sex, tumor volume, tumor laterality, and optic canal involvement. Results: Propensity score matching yielded 48 matched pairs with adequate balance across all measured covariates (all standardized mean differences < 0.1). Postoperative normal visual function was preserved or achieved in 95.8% of patients with normal preoperative visual function versus 31.3% of those with preoperative visual dysfunction (exact McNemar p < 0.001). Favorable visual outcome occurred in 95.8% versus 77.1%, respectively (p = 0.0225). Conclusions: Among surgically treated patients, normal preoperative visual function remained strongly associated with postoperative normal visual function after adjustment for measured clinical and anatomical differences. These findings do not establish that earlier surgery improves visual outcomes or define an optimal surgical timing strategy, but suggest that preoperative visual status and tumor anatomy should be considered in individualized management decisions.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -