Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC nephrology

The reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the Uncertainty about Disease and Treatment Scale in hemodialysis patients.

  1. 1Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Turkey. [email protected].
  2. 2Vocational School of Health Services, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey.
  3. 3Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Turkey.

Abstract

Background

Uncertainty is common in chronic illness and can weaken treatment adherence and psychosocial well-being. Hemodialysis involves persistent symptoms and treatment unpredictability, making uncertainty assessment clinically important. This study was methodologically designed to test the psychometric properties of the Turkish form of the Uncertainty about Disease and Treatment Scale (UC-D&TS) in hemodialysis patients.Method

Adult patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis in a state hospital and a private dialysis center in southern Turkey were recruited between February and June 2025 (n = 155). The scale underwent linguistic and cultural adaptation using the forward-backward translation method. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a randomly selected subgroup of 50 participants from the original sample after a 2-week interval. Data were collected using a Descriptive Information Form and the 17-item UC-D&TS (5-point Likert). Content validity was assessed via expert review and content validity index (CVI). Construct validity was examined with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO), Bartlett's test, exploratory factor analysis (EFA; principal axis factoring extraction, varimax), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in LISREL. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and stability using test-retest reliability.Results

Content validity was acceptable (CVI = 0.80). Sampling adequacy supported factor analysis (KMO = 0.821) and Bartlett's test was significant (χ²=992.856, p < 0.001). EFA produced a four-factor solution explaining 59.13% of variance; all loadings were ≥ 0.30 and no items were removed. CFA indicated acceptable fit (χ²/df = 1.77; NNFI = 0.93; CFI = 0.94; IFI = 0.95; PNFI = 0.74; SRMR = 0.072; RMSEA = 0.071). Reliability was high (total α = 0.872; subscales α = 0.641-0.824) and test-retest reliability was excellent (r = 0.986).Conclusions

The Turkish UC-D&TS, which underwent Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to determine its factor structure, demonstrated satisfactory content validity, a stable four-factor structure, acceptable model fit, high internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

Related

  1. Reliability and validity of the death anxiety scale in patients with mental illnesses in a general hospital
    Yanping Duan, Boheng Zhu, Wenqi Geng +7
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  2. Development and validity and reliability testing of a questionnaire on life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients
    Runqin Huang, Xingyu Zhang, Wei Chen +2
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Reliability and Validity Assessment of the General Medication Adherence Scale among Breast Cancer Patients in Pakistan
    Daniya Noreen, Sadia Shakeel, Najia Rahim +5
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCPPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Reliability and validity of the ICF core elements scale for swallowing function assessment in stroke patients: a single-center study from Hunan, China
    Yi Dong, Hao Tan, Junrong Chen +3
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Isometric Trunk Rotation Strength Test
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{gundogan2026reliability,
  title = {{The reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the Uncertainty about Disease and Treatment Scale in hemodialysis patients.}},
  author = {Reva Gündoğan and Onur Çetinkaya and Mümin Savaş},
  journal = {BMC nephrology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12882-026-05227-y},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897558},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the Uncertainty about Disease and Treatment Scale in hemodialysis patients.
AU  - Reva Gündoğan
AU  - Onur Çetinkaya
AU  - Mümin Savaş
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC nephrology
DO  - 10.1186/s12882-026-05227-y
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897558
AB  - Background  Uncertainty is common in chronic illness and can weaken treatment adherence and psychosocial well-being. Hemodialysis involves persistent symptoms and treatment unpredictability, making uncertainty assessment clinically important. This study was methodologically designed to test the psychometric properties of the Turkish form of the Uncertainty about Disease and Treatment Scale (UC-D&TS) in hemodialysis patients.Method  Adult patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis in a state hospital and a private dialysis center in southern Turkey were recruited between February and June 2025 (n = 155). The scale underwent linguistic and cultural adaptation using the forward-backward translation method. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a randomly selected subgroup of 50 participants from the original sample after a 2-week interval. Data were collected using a Descriptive Information Form and the 17-item UC-D&TS (5-point Likert). Content validity was assessed via expert review and content validity index (CVI). Construct validity was examined with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO), Bartlett's test, exploratory factor analysis (EFA; principal axis factoring extraction, varimax), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in LISREL. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and stability using test-retest reliability.Results  Content validity was acceptable (CVI = 0.80). Sampling adequacy supported factor analysis (KMO = 0.821) and Bartlett's test was significant (χ²=992.856, p < 0.001). EFA produced a four-factor solution explaining 59.13% of variance; all loadings were ≥ 0.30 and no items were removed. CFA indicated acceptable fit (χ²/df = 1.77; NNFI = 0.93; CFI = 0.94; IFI = 0.95; PNFI = 0.74; SRMR = 0.072; RMSEA = 0.071). Reliability was high (total α = 0.872; subscales α = 0.641-0.824) and test-retest reliability was excellent (r = 0.986).Conclusions  The Turkish UC-D&TS, which underwent Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to determine its factor structure, demonstrated satisfactory content validity, a stable four-factor structure, acceptable model fit, high internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.
SN  - 1471-2369
ER  -