Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Development and validity and reliability testing of a questionnaire on life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients

4 affiliations
  1. 1Cerebrovascular Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
  2. 2Nursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
  3. 3Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
  4. 4Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Abstract

Objective: To develop a questionnaire on life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients and test its reliability and validity.

Methods: This study is a methodological research aimed at developing a questionnaire and conducting psychometric evaluation on it. The 5W1H method is used as the theoretical framework for the preference dimensions of life and death education. The initial questionnaire was developed through literature analysis, qualitative interviews, and delphi expert consultation. A questionnaire survey was conducted on 300 cancer patients hospitalized in the oncology department of a general hospital in Zunyi from March 2022 to July 2022 to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.

Results: The questionnaire of life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients included 25 items in 3 dimensions(life and death education cognition, life and death education attitude, life and death education selection preference). Validity and reliability of graded score items. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.86 to 1.00;the scale-level content validity index of all consistency was 0.90;the scale-level average content validity index was 0.986. The Cronbach’s α coefficient, half reliability and retest reliability of the overall scale were 0.954,0.892,and 0.853,respectively. and the Cronbach’s α coefficients of each dimension were 0.85, 0.947, and 0.943, respectively.

Conclusion: The questionnaire of life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients has good reliability and validity, and has the value of clinical application. It can be used as an auxiliary tool to evaluate the life and death education cognition and life and death education needs of cancer patients.

Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier ChiCTR2600134780.

Related

  1. Development and reliability test of the work stress questionnaire for cancer survivors after returning to work (WSQ-CS)
    YuWen Zhou, YuTing Zhong, JingJing Dai +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  2. Development, content validation and reliability assessment of the Bowel Irrigation Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Transanal Irrigation: a multi-methods study
    E. Farrow, R. Balachandran, R. Embleton +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  3. Development and psychometric validation of substance abuse prevention questionnaire based on the multi-theory model: construct validity and reliability
    Seyed Alireza Afshani, Nahid Ardian, Seyed Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabad +3
    BMC PsychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  4. Education as a Proxy for Cognitive Reserve, and Its Moderating Role in the Amyloid–Cognition Relationship Across the Alzheimer’s Continuum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yuan Yang, Yun Zhang, Jaymie R. Meliker +3
    Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JADPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Sleep Problem Acceptance Questionnaire
    Mizuki Bando, Tomohiro Asakura, Hiroshi Sato +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsPsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
BibTeX
@article{huang2026development,
  title = {{Development and validity and reliability testing of a questionnaire on life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients}},
  author = {Runqin Huang and Xingyu Zhang and Wei Chen and Yonghong Li and Jing Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1822600},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1822600/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and validity and reliability testing of a questionnaire on life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients
AU  - Runqin Huang
AU  - Xingyu Zhang
AU  - Wei Chen
AU  - Yonghong Li
AU  - Jing Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1822600
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1822600/full
AB  - Objective: To develop a questionnaire on life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients and test its reliability and validity.  Methods: This study is a methodological research aimed at developing a questionnaire and conducting psychometric evaluation on it. The 5W1H method is used as the theoretical framework for the preference dimensions of life and death education. The initial questionnaire was developed through literature analysis, qualitative interviews, and delphi expert consultation. A questionnaire survey was conducted on 300 cancer patients hospitalized in the oncology department of a general hospital in Zunyi from March 2022 to July 2022 to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.  Results: The questionnaire of life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients included 25 items in 3 dimensions(life and death education cognition, life and death education attitude, life and death education selection preference). Validity and reliability of graded score items. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.86 to 1.00;the scale-level content validity index of all consistency was 0.90;the scale-level average content validity index was 0.986. The Cronbach’s α coefficient, half reliability and retest reliability of the overall scale were 0.954,0.892,and 0.853,respectively. and the Cronbach’s α coefficients of each dimension were 0.85, 0.947, and 0.943, respectively.  Conclusion: The questionnaire of life and death education cognition and selection preference of cancer patients has good reliability and validity, and has the value of clinical application. It can be used as an auxiliary tool to evaluate the life and death education cognition and life and death education needs of cancer patients.  Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier ChiCTR2600134780.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -