Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Psychiatry

Long-term outcomes of nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
  2. 2Graduate Studies and Research Section, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional
  3. 3Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
  4. 4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, LVR Hospital Bonn
  5. 5Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg
  6. 6Alexianer Hospital Cologne, Alexianer Köln GmbH

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapeutic option for carefully selected patients with severe, treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but very long-term outcomes remain insufficiently characterized. We evaluated clinical outcomes after DBS targeting the nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule (NAcc/ALIC) over 3–21 years and described the trajectories of early responders, delayed responders, and non-responders.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included 30 consecutive patients (17 women) who underwent NAcc/ALIC DBS between 2004 and 2022. Outcomes were assessed with the Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) at baseline (T0), 1 year after surgery (T1), and the latest follow-up at ≥3 years (T2). Response was defined as a ≥35% reduction from baseline. Repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons was used to assess changes over time.

Results: Y-BOCS scores decreased significantly across T0, T1, and T2. At T2, 22 of 30 patients (73.3%) met the response criterion; eight were delayed responders. Of the 15 patients who met the response criterion at T1, 14 retained it at T2 and 1 did not.

Conclusion: Clinically meaningful improvement was sustained at long-term follow-up, and some patients who had not responded after 1 year met the response criterion later. Once response was achieved, subsequent loss of response appeared uncommon in this cohort. The retrospective design and heterogeneous follow-up duration preclude causal conclusions regarding DBS or the temporal course of improvement.

Related

  1. Nucleus Accumbens-Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: An Open-label Pilot Study
    C. Lu, X. Zhang, Z. Zhai +14
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  2. Patient-specific subnetwork connectivity predicts deep brain stimulation response in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Robert L. Seilheimer, Nikolaos Vardalakis, Wonkyung Choi +16
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxivPMC
  3. Assessing the effect of subthalamic stimulation on metaperception in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Audrey Kist, Michael Pereira, Ramla Msheik +6
    Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  4. Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: Comorbidity, Biomarkers, Circuits, and Treatment Strategies
    Xiao‐Yang Zhang, Zi‐Hao Li, Li‐Ping Shen +7
    MedCommPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. Reduced cortical thickness in obsessive-compulsive disorder and candidate molecular correlates
    Yufei Chen, Haoran Li, Fenghua Long +3
    Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{cidrodriguez2026longterm,
  title = {{Long-term outcomes of nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder}},
  author = {Fátima Ximena Cid-Rodríguez and Rabea Schmahl and René Márquez-Franco and Petra Heiden and Marvin Antonio Soriano-Ursúa and Wencke Wagemann and Daniel Huys and Juan C. Baldermann and Jens Kuhn and Veerle Visser-Vandewalle and Pablo Andrade},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1905823},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1905823/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Long-term outcomes of nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder
AU  - Fátima Ximena Cid-Rodríguez
AU  - Rabea Schmahl
AU  - René Márquez-Franco
AU  - Petra Heiden
AU  - Marvin Antonio Soriano-Ursúa
AU  - Wencke Wagemann
AU  - Daniel Huys
AU  - Juan C. Baldermann
AU  - Jens Kuhn
AU  - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
AU  - Pablo Andrade
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1905823
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1905823/full
AB  - Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapeutic option for carefully selected patients with severe, treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but very long-term outcomes remain insufficiently characterized. We evaluated clinical outcomes after DBS targeting the nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule (NAcc/ALIC) over 3–21 years and described the trajectories of early responders, delayed responders, and non-responders.  Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included 30 consecutive patients (17 women) who underwent NAcc/ALIC DBS between 2004 and 2022. Outcomes were assessed with the Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) at baseline (T0), 1 year after surgery (T1), and the latest follow-up at ≥3 years (T2). Response was defined as a ≥35% reduction from baseline. Repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons was used to assess changes over time.  Results: Y-BOCS scores decreased significantly across T0, T1, and T2. At T2, 22 of 30 patients (73.3%) met the response criterion; eight were delayed responders. Of the 15 patients who met the response criterion at T1, 14 retained it at T2 and 1 did not.  Conclusion: Clinically meaningful improvement was sustained at long-term follow-up, and some patients who had not responded after 1 year met the response criterion later. Once response was achieved, subsequent loss of response appeared uncommon in this cohort. The retrospective design and heterogeneous follow-up duration preclude causal conclusions regarding DBS or the temporal course of improvement.
SN  - 1664-0640
ER  -