Action potential waveforms are state-dependent
- 1Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
Abstract
Action potentials are brief electrical impulses that form the mechanistic basis for how neurons communicate. While it is well known that the shape of action potentials can differ across neurons, one fundamental assumption is that the complex voltage waveforms of action potentials within a given neuron are reducible to binary spikes. This assumption has constrained our conception of possible neural codes to those amenable to binary signaling, such as rate, temporal, and population codes. Here, we show that action potential waveform variability is not random, but is, instead, state dependent. To show this, we parameterize action potential waveforms in a set of very high temporal resolution (200 kHz) intracellular action potential recordings. We show that an action potential is not a digital '1', but is instead a rich signal whose fine-scale features influence the shape and timing of the next action potential and whose waveform is systematically biased by input drive. We then show that intracellular action potential waveforms can vary as a function of the extracellular local field potential, but do so heterogeneously, as a function of the field potential amplitude and standard deviation. Our results have profound implications for systems and computational neuroscience, especially regarding the development of next-generation, biologically-inspired artificial neural networks that incorporate waveform dynamics. Non-binary action potentials point to a broader landscape of possible neural codes, whereby neurons communicate not just via binary spikes, but through their state-dependent waveform features.
Related
- Systems genetics identifies ETS1 as a stress-dependent regulator of adipocyte insulin action and heme-iron homeostasis
- Action Potential Thresholds and Excitability from the Geometry of Membrane Potential
- Long-Term Reconfiguration of Dynamic Polarization and Action Potential Initiation in Purkinje Cell Axons
- Pharmacologic modulation of orexin signaling: Impact on glucose–insulin homeostasis and potential mechanism of antidepressant action
- From Tool State to Scientific Action: Auditing Decision Provenance in Biomedical Research Agents
BibTeX
@misc{martinburgos2026action,
title = {{Action potential waveforms are state-dependent}},
author = {B. Martin-Burgos and A. Juavinett and P. D. Riviere and R. Hammonds and B. Voytek},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.15.751814},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.751814v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Action potential waveforms are state-dependent
AU - B. Martin-Burgos
AU - A. Juavinett
AU - P. D. Riviere
AU - R. Hammonds
AU - B. Voytek
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/15
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.15.751814
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.15.751814v1
AB - Action potentials are brief electrical impulses that form the mechanistic basis for how neurons communicate. While it is well known that the shape of action potentials can differ across neurons, one fundamental assumption is that the complex voltage waveforms of action potentials within a given neuron are reducible to binary spikes. This assumption has constrained our conception of possible neural codes to those amenable to binary signaling, such as rate, temporal, and population codes. Here, we show that action potential waveform variability is not random, but is, instead, state dependent. To show this, we parameterize action potential waveforms in a set of very high temporal resolution (200 kHz) intracellular action potential recordings. We show that an action potential is not a digital '1', but is instead a rich signal whose fine-scale features influence the shape and timing of the next action potential and whose waveform is systematically biased by input drive. We then show that intracellular action potential waveforms can vary as a function of the extracellular local field potential, but do so heterogeneously, as a function of the field potential amplitude and standard deviation. Our results have profound implications for systems and computational neuroscience, especially regarding the development of next-generation, biologically-inspired artificial neural networks that incorporate waveform dynamics. Non-binary action potentials point to a broader landscape of possible neural codes, whereby neurons communicate not just via binary spikes, but through their state-dependent waveform features.
ER -