Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
185,139 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

When Can Voting Help, Hurt, or Change Course? Exact Structure of Binary Test-Time Aggregation

Abstract

Increasing a voting budget can improve or reduce population accuracy, and an initial gain or loss need not persist. We give a complete structural classification of these curves for binary unweighted majority under infinitely exchangeable correctness indicators, with an arbitrary latent success-probability law Π. The classification is encoded by the signed voting signature $ ω_Π(B)=\int \mathbf{1}\{q(1-q)\in B\}(2q-1)\,Π(\,\mathrm{d} q). $ The complete odd-budget curve and this signature determine each other: the initial accuracy gives its total signed mass, and successive budget increments give its higher moments. Reflection-symmetric differences between latent laws are exactly the changes invisible to voting. A weighted total-variation constraint characterizes every attainable signature, and a minimum-mass allocation to the two reflected branches, completed by symmetric probability mass, gives every population producing its curve. Consequently, the full curve identifies the latent population precisely when no symmetric mass remains to redistribute.

Related

  1. Recovering Collective Structure in Congressional Voting: A Fused Latent Factor and Network Approach
    Hane Lee, Andrew Davison
    OSF PreprintsPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsOSF
  2. Nuisance structure and the detection boundary for population size: how profiling can change a rate, not only a constant
    Yakir Berchenko
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. DOMIC: Provably Calibrated Detection of Dependence-Structure Change Points via Density-Operator Mutual Information
    Jiwon Kang, Yun Am Seo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Anchor-proofness in Voting with Ranked Ballots
    Federico Fioravanti, Zoi Terzopoulou
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  5. There can be equitable social welfare orders but no fair voting system
    Azul Fatalini, Luke Serafin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textLogic & foundationsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{liu2026when,
  title = {{When Can Voting Help, Hurt, or Change Course? Exact Structure of Binary Test-Time Aggregation}},
  author = {Yi Liu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.05592},
  eprint = {2605.05592},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05592},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When Can Voting Help, Hurt, or Change Course? Exact Structure of Binary Test-Time Aggregation
AU  - Yi Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.05592
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05592
AB  - Increasing a voting budget can improve or reduce population accuracy, and an initial gain or loss need not persist. We give a complete structural classification of these curves for binary unweighted majority under infinitely exchangeable correctness indicators, with an arbitrary latent success-probability law Π. The classification is encoded by the signed voting signature $ ω_Π(B)=\int \mathbf{1}\{q(1-q)\in B\}(2q-1)\,Π(\,\mathrm{d} q). $ The complete odd-budget curve and this signature determine each other: the initial accuracy gives its total signed mass, and successive budget increments give its higher moments. Reflection-symmetric differences between latent laws are exactly the changes invisible to voting. A weighted total-variation constraint characterizes every attainable signature, and a minimum-mass allocation to the two reflected branches, completed by symmetric probability mass, gives every population producing its curve. Consequently, the full curve identifies the latent population precisely when no symmetric mass remains to redistribute.
ER  -