Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Interventions during pregnancy and the postnatal period for parents in vulnerable life situations

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial vulnerability during pregnancy and the postnatal period can negatively affect parental well‑being, parent–infant relationships, and child development. Early interventions delivered by maternity care providers may mitigate these risks, but the evidence from high‑income countries remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials published between 2000 and 2025. Eligible interventions targeted parents in high-income countries experiencing psychosocial vulnerability, requiring support beyond routine maternity care and were delivered by maternity care providers during pregnancy or within six months postpartum to enhance parenting skills. Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Data were synthesised narratively and grouped by intervention modality, resource demand, and timing. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Core GRADE principles.

Results: Across the nine studies, interventions varied in design, delivery mode, and intensity. Statistically significant effects appeared sporadically and did not form consistent or clinically meaningful patterns. Most primary outcomes related to parenting competence and parent–infant interaction remained non-significant, while findings for secondary outcomes were similarly inconsistent. All studies had high risk of bias in at least two key domains, and the certainty of evidence was low or very low.

Conclusions: This review found limited and inconsistent evidence for the effectiveness of early parenting interventions for psychosocially vulnerable parents in high‑income countries. While isolated positive effects were reported, they were not consistent across studies. The findings highlight substantial gaps in the evidence base and underline the need for rigorously designed, adequately powered trials that integrate feasibility, participant engagement, and responsiveness to the complex support needs of vulnerable families.

Key messages: • Evidence for early parenting interventions for psychosocially vulnerable parents in high‑income countries is limited and inconsistent, highlighting a critical gap in effective early support.

• Findings show a need for rigorously designed, well‑powered trials to identify feasible, context‑sensitive interventions that can genuinely strengthen early parenting among vulnerable families.

Related

  1. WHO recommendations for pregnancy and postnatal care clarified
    Mercedes Bonet, Maria Barreix, Özge Tunçalp +1
    Bulletin of the World Health OrganizationPeer-reviewedCC BY 3.0-IGOFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  2. A Strength‑Based Neurodiversity‑Affirming Investigation of Digital Interventions for Autistic Children in China: Multi‑Perspective Thematic Analysis With Parents and Therapists
    Vicky Yiran Zhao, Ling Li, Gang Zeng +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. A realist synthesis of evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent mental health problems in children and parents living in poverty
    R. McGovern, D. Smart, C. Muir +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  4. Community-based delivery of lifesaving maternal and newborn health interventions in vulnerable Ethiopian communities: Lessons from implementation research
    Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh, Agumasie Semahegn, Alemnesh Hailemariam Mirkuzie +20
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Obstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPLOS
  5. Factors influencing childhood vaccine hesitancy and interventions for parents and caregivers from ethnic minority backgrounds in the United Kingdom to encourage uptake: a systematic review
    Tarela Juliet Ike, Dung Ezekiel Jidong, Callistar Kidochukwu Obi +16
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wienecke2026interventions,
  title = {{Interventions during pregnancy and the postnatal period for parents in vulnerable life situations}},
  author = {L S Wienecke and L Broberg and S F Villadsen and E Rydahl and M Andersson Søe and P S Hyttel and M L Schiøtz and H Johnsen},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1667},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1667},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Interventions during pregnancy and the postnatal period for parents in vulnerable life situations
AU  - L S Wienecke
AU  - L Broberg
AU  - S F Villadsen
AU  - E Rydahl
AU  - M Andersson Søe
AU  - P S Hyttel
AU  - M L Schiøtz
AU  - H Johnsen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1667
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1667
AB  - Background: Psychosocial vulnerability during pregnancy and the postnatal period can negatively affect parental well‑being, parent–infant relationships, and child development. Early interventions delivered by maternity care providers may mitigate these risks, but the evidence from high‑income countries remains unclear.  Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials published between 2000 and 2025. Eligible interventions targeted parents in high-income countries experiencing psychosocial vulnerability, requiring support beyond routine maternity care and were delivered by maternity care providers during pregnancy or within six months postpartum to enhance parenting skills. Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Data were synthesised narratively and grouped by intervention modality, resource demand, and timing. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Core GRADE principles.  Results: Across the nine studies, interventions varied in design, delivery mode, and intensity. Statistically significant effects appeared sporadically and did not form consistent or clinically meaningful patterns. Most primary outcomes related to parenting competence and parent–infant interaction remained non-significant, while findings for secondary outcomes were similarly inconsistent. All studies had high risk of bias in at least two key domains, and the certainty of evidence was low or very low.  Conclusions: This review found limited and inconsistent evidence for the effectiveness of early parenting interventions for psychosocially vulnerable parents in high‑income countries. While isolated positive effects were reported, they were not consistent across studies. The findings highlight substantial gaps in the evidence base and underline the need for rigorously designed, adequately powered trials that integrate feasibility, participant engagement, and responsiveness to the complex support needs of vulnerable families.  Key messages: • Evidence for early parenting interventions for psychosocially vulnerable parents in high‑income countries is limited and inconsistent, highlighting a critical gap in effective early support.  • Findings show a need for rigorously designed, well‑powered trials to identify feasible, context‑sensitive interventions that can genuinely strengthen early parenting among vulnerable families.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -