Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Gambling and hidden practices in Danish forensic psychiatry

Abstract

Background: This is the first study to examine gambling within medium-secure forensic psychiatric care in Denmark. The aim is to understand how prevalent gambling is, as well as how patients and staff experience and understand gambling and financial management, thereby providing insight into how gambling practices intersect with ward life, clinical relations, and recovery processes.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted across 19 hospital units in two major Danish health regions. In addition, semi-structured interviews with patients and staff members were conducted to explore participants’ perspectives on gambling, money management, and the institutional conditions that shape these practices.

Results: Gambling problems were significantly more prevalent among forensic psychiatric patients than in the normative sample. Gambling was linked to attempts at self-regulation, family involvement, and, in some cases, other addictions. Staff perspectives varied, ranging from viewing gambling as harmless recreation to identifying it as a clinical concern associated with impulsivity, mood instability, or conflict. Throughout the interviews, financial autonomy emerged as a key domain. Hidden economies, such as informal loans and undisclosed debts, existed outside of institutional visibility, complicating therapeutic alliances and limiting staff’s ability to intervene without eroding trust.

Conclusions: Gambling has emerged as an ordinary yet disruptive aspect of ward life, shaping autonomy and clinical relations while also creating secrecy at the wards. The discussion suggests that clearer expectations, routine investigation, and responsive financial support could help address gambling-related harm without eroding trust. Such measures may help strengthen recovery processes, but their effectiveness will depend on how well they are integrated into the relational fabric of secure care.

Key messages: • This first qualitative study shows how gambling in forensic psychiatry shapes autonomy, trust, and recovery, while hidden debts and secrecy complicate care and increase vulnerability.

• Routine, non-stigmatizing enquiry about gambling and financial strain could reduce hidden harm, strengthen therapeutic alliances, and support recovery in secure psychiatric care.

Related

  1. Chronic Kidney Disease–Associated Pruritus in Danish Dialysis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study of Prevalence, Disease Burden, and Current Treatment Practices
    Gustav Ø. Larsen, Krista D. Kjærgaard, Christian F. Christiansen +7
    Kidney medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Rethinking networks through relatedness - a qualitative study among inpatients in forensic psychiatry.
    Berit Kjærside Nielsen, Lisbeth Uhrskov Sørensen, Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl +2
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Prevalence and correlates of gambling problems among forensic psychiatric patients: evidence of elevated rates from a multi-site study
    Jakob W. Eriksen, Lisbeth U. Sørensen, Søren Kristiansen +7
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Life satisfaction of patients in forensic psychiatry departments in the context of illness acceptance and clinical and demographic factors
    Joanna Fojcik, Daniel Szawarnoga, Michał Górski
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  5. Post-autopsy communication with next of kin in medico-legal contexts: A cross-national survey of practices in French and Belgian Forensic Institutes
    Cécile Furic, Marine Jourdan, Coralie Hermetet +2
    Archives of Legal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{hansen2026gambling,
  title = {{Gambling and hidden practices in Danish forensic psychiatry}},
  author = {RM Hansen and LU Sørensen and S Kristiansen and JW Eriksen and L Frostholm and T Marcussen and MD Terkildsen},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1353},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1353},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Gambling and hidden practices in Danish forensic psychiatry
AU  - RM Hansen
AU  - LU Sørensen
AU  - S Kristiansen
AU  - JW Eriksen
AU  - L Frostholm
AU  - T Marcussen
AU  - MD Terkildsen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1353
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1353
AB  - Background: This is the first study to examine gambling within medium-secure forensic psychiatric care in Denmark. The aim is to understand how prevalent gambling is, as well as how patients and staff experience and understand gambling and financial management, thereby providing insight into how gambling practices intersect with ward life, clinical relations, and recovery processes.  Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted across 19 hospital units in two major Danish health regions. In addition, semi-structured interviews with patients and staff members were conducted to explore participants’ perspectives on gambling, money management, and the institutional conditions that shape these practices.  Results: Gambling problems were significantly more prevalent among forensic psychiatric patients than in the normative sample. Gambling was linked to attempts at self-regulation, family involvement, and, in some cases, other addictions. Staff perspectives varied, ranging from viewing gambling as harmless recreation to identifying it as a clinical concern associated with impulsivity, mood instability, or conflict. Throughout the interviews, financial autonomy emerged as a key domain. Hidden economies, such as informal loans and undisclosed debts, existed outside of institutional visibility, complicating therapeutic alliances and limiting staff’s ability to intervene without eroding trust.  Conclusions: Gambling has emerged as an ordinary yet disruptive aspect of ward life, shaping autonomy and clinical relations while also creating secrecy at the wards. The discussion suggests that clearer expectations, routine investigation, and responsive financial support could help address gambling-related harm without eroding trust. Such measures may help strengthen recovery processes, but their effectiveness will depend on how well they are integrated into the relational fabric of secure care.  Key messages: • This first qualitative study shows how gambling in forensic psychiatry shapes autonomy, trust, and recovery, while hidden debts and secrecy complicate care and increase vulnerability.  • Routine, non-stigmatizing enquiry about gambling and financial strain could reduce hidden harm, strengthen therapeutic alliances, and support recovery in secure psychiatric care.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -