Rethinking networks through relatedness - a qualitative study among inpatients in forensic psychiatry.
5 affiliations
- 1Public Health Research, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
- 2Department of Public Health, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- 3Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
- 4Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- 5Centre for Social Work, University College Absalon, Roskilde, Denmark.
Abstract
Background
Recovery-oriented approaches in forensic psychiatry increasingly emphasize the importance of social relationships. However, research and practice have primarily approached significant relationships through a family-caregiver lens leaving less knowledge about the broader range of relationships that may be meaningful to patients. Drawing on the concept of relatedness, this study explores how forensic psychiatric inpatients understand and negotiate their networks of significant relations during long-term admission.Methods
A qualitative study was conducted in two medium secure forensic psychiatric units in Denmark. Twenty-four inpatients participated in semi-structured interviews supported by sociograms, which enabled participants to map and reflect on their social networks. Data were analyzed using a combination of descriptive analysis of sociograms and reflexive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.Results
Participants described their networks as fluid and context-dependent, encompassing not only biological relatives but also peers, former partners, professionals, and symbolically or digitally mediated relations. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) temporal trajectories, highlighting how relationships were shaped by past ruptures, present functions, and future hopes; (2) forms of relational presence, including emotional and symbolic connections as well as ambivalence; and (3) relational dynamics and agency, reflecting how participants actively maintained, redefined, or distanced themselves from relationships under institutional constraints. Relationships were characterized by both significance and fragility, with participants navigating tensions between connection, burden, and self-preservation.Conclusions
The findings challenge narrow conceptions of informal caregiving in forensic psychiatry by demonstrating that patients' significant networks extend beyond family-based models. Adopting a relatedness perspective highlights the need for clinical practices that recognize diverse and patient-defined relationships, including symbolic and context-specific forms of connection. Tailoring involvement strategies to patients' own relational priorities, while remaining attentive to ambivalence and potential burden, may support more nuanced and person-centered approaches to recovery in forensic psychiatric care.
Related
- Metabolic syndrome in patients diagnosed with affective disorders: a cross-sectional study among inpatients from two Cluj-Napoca psychiatry clinics
- Experiences of exercise and mental well-being among psychiatric inpatients: a qualitative study
- The Lived Care Experiences of Neurorehabilitation Inpatients: A Phenomenological Qualitative Exploratory Study.
- Qualitative analysis of staff views on caring for inpatients with delirium and Parkinson's disease: Challenges, tensions and team working.
- Medical students and clinical teachers experiences and perceptions of using AI-based simulated patients in psychiatry clinical skills training, a qualitative analysis
BibTeX
@article{nielsen2026rethinking,
title = {{Rethinking networks through relatedness - a qualitative study among inpatients in forensic psychiatry.}},
author = {Berit Kjærside Nielsen and Lisbeth Uhrskov Sørensen and Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl and Jette Møllerhøj and Morten Deleuran Terkildsen},
journal = {Frontiers in psychiatry},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1870584},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903589},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Rethinking networks through relatedness - a qualitative study among inpatients in forensic psychiatry.
AU - Berit Kjærside Nielsen
AU - Lisbeth Uhrskov Sørensen
AU - Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
AU - Jette Møllerhøj
AU - Morten Deleuran Terkildsen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Frontiers in psychiatry
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1870584
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903589
AB - Background Recovery-oriented approaches in forensic psychiatry increasingly emphasize the importance of social relationships. However, research and practice have primarily approached significant relationships through a family-caregiver lens leaving less knowledge about the broader range of relationships that may be meaningful to patients. Drawing on the concept of relatedness, this study explores how forensic psychiatric inpatients understand and negotiate their networks of significant relations during long-term admission.Methods A qualitative study was conducted in two medium secure forensic psychiatric units in Denmark. Twenty-four inpatients participated in semi-structured interviews supported by sociograms, which enabled participants to map and reflect on their social networks. Data were analyzed using a combination of descriptive analysis of sociograms and reflexive thematic analysis of interview transcripts.Results Participants described their networks as fluid and context-dependent, encompassing not only biological relatives but also peers, former partners, professionals, and symbolically or digitally mediated relations. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) temporal trajectories, highlighting how relationships were shaped by past ruptures, present functions, and future hopes; (2) forms of relational presence, including emotional and symbolic connections as well as ambivalence; and (3) relational dynamics and agency, reflecting how participants actively maintained, redefined, or distanced themselves from relationships under institutional constraints. Relationships were characterized by both significance and fragility, with participants navigating tensions between connection, burden, and self-preservation.Conclusions The findings challenge narrow conceptions of informal caregiving in forensic psychiatry by demonstrating that patients' significant networks extend beyond family-based models. Adopting a relatedness perspective highlights the need for clinical practices that recognize diverse and patient-defined relationships, including symbolic and context-specific forms of connection. Tailoring involvement strategies to patients' own relational priorities, while remaining attentive to ambivalence and potential burden, may support more nuanced and person-centered approaches to recovery in forensic psychiatric care.
SN - 1664-0640
ER -