Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Early Discontinuation of Opioid-Based Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Single-Port Adnexal Laparoscopy: Incidence, Reasons, and Postoperative Outcomes

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu 11759, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) provides postoperative analgesia but can cause adverse effects that lead to early discontinuation. In relatively limited procedures such as single-port access (SPA) adnexal laparoscopy, the balance between analgesic benefit and opioid-related adverse effects remains uncertain. We evaluated the frequency of and recorded reasons for early IV-PCA discontinuation, associated factors, postoperative pain, and length of stay. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 431 patients who received IV-PCA after single-port access (SPA) adnexal laparoscopy at two institutions. Early discontinuation was defined as permanent cessation before completion of the planned course. Associations with demographic and operative factors, concurrent continuous wound infiltration, and treating institution were examined. Repeated-measures analysis accounted for discontinuation timing and repeated pain assessments. Results: IV-PCA was discontinued early in 13.9% of patients. Among patients who discontinued IV-PCA, 85.0% had nausea or vomiting recorded as the reason for discontinuation. Of 59 patients with valid timing data, 47 (79.7%) discontinued within 24 h. No measured factor was significantly associated with discontinuation after adjustment. Unadjusted mean pain scores were 0.30, 0.39, and 0.28 points higher at 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively, but these differences were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Repeated-measures analysis showed no overall pain difference (+0.09 points, 95% CI −0.21 to +0.39). A secondary analysis suggested variation over time, but no time-specific estimate was statistically significant. Length of stay was similar between groups. Conclusions: Early IV-PCA discontinuation after SPA adnexal laparoscopy was mainly attributed to nausea or vomiting. These findings do not establish whether opioid-based IV-PCA is necessary or should be avoided in this setting; rather, they highlight the need to balance its potential analgesic benefit against opioid-related adverse effects and to prospectively evaluate alternative multimodal analgesic strategies.

Related

  1. Effects of different doses of esketamine as an adjunct to sufentanil-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative analgesia and opioid consumption following lumbar decompression surgery: a dose-finding randomized controlled trial
    Jun-jie Liu, Xin Wang, Pan-pan Ding +3
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  2. Dose-Response Effects of Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjunct to Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
    Jingjing Zhang, Lei He, Ting Liu +5
    Journal of pain researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  3. Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine for analgesia after oral cancer surgery with free perforator flap reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial
    Yuqi Zhang, Yihang Li, Xinying Yue +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. Effect of Adding Esketamine to Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Rebound Pain After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ruipeng Zhong, Lanhua Zhong, Hua Zhu +3
    Drug Design, Development and TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  5. Efficacy of different doses of oliceridine for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia in patients undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
    Jiaojiao Deng, Baobao Ma, Kaihua Wei +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologySurgery & anaesthesiaPLOS
BibTeX
@article{paik2026early,
  title = {{Early Discontinuation of Opioid-Based Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Single-Port Adnexal Laparoscopy: Incidence, Reasons, and Postoperative Outcomes}},
  author = {E Sun Paik and Yeji Jang and Hawon Kim and Jun-Hyeok Kang},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15207774},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7774},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Early Discontinuation of Opioid-Based Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Single-Port Adnexal Laparoscopy: Incidence, Reasons, and Postoperative Outcomes
AU  - E Sun Paik
AU  - Yeji Jang
AU  - Hawon Kim
AU  - Jun-Hyeok Kang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15207774
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7774
AB  - Background/Objectives: Opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) provides postoperative analgesia but can cause adverse effects that lead to early discontinuation. In relatively limited procedures such as single-port access (SPA) adnexal laparoscopy, the balance between analgesic benefit and opioid-related adverse effects remains uncertain. We evaluated the frequency of and recorded reasons for early IV-PCA discontinuation, associated factors, postoperative pain, and length of stay. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 431 patients who received IV-PCA after single-port access (SPA) adnexal laparoscopy at two institutions. Early discontinuation was defined as permanent cessation before completion of the planned course. Associations with demographic and operative factors, concurrent continuous wound infiltration, and treating institution were examined. Repeated-measures analysis accounted for discontinuation timing and repeated pain assessments. Results: IV-PCA was discontinued early in 13.9% of patients. Among patients who discontinued IV-PCA, 85.0% had nausea or vomiting recorded as the reason for discontinuation. Of 59 patients with valid timing data, 47 (79.7%) discontinued within 24 h. No measured factor was significantly associated with discontinuation after adjustment. Unadjusted mean pain scores were 0.30, 0.39, and 0.28 points higher at 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively, but these differences were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Repeated-measures analysis showed no overall pain difference (+0.09 points, 95% CI −0.21 to +0.39). A secondary analysis suggested variation over time, but no time-specific estimate was statistically significant. Length of stay was similar between groups. Conclusions: Early IV-PCA discontinuation after SPA adnexal laparoscopy was mainly attributed to nausea or vomiting. These findings do not establish whether opioid-based IV-PCA is necessary or should be avoided in this setting; rather, they highlight the need to balance its potential analgesic benefit against opioid-related adverse effects and to prospectively evaluate alternative multimodal analgesic strategies.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -