Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Ecology and Evolution

Focal vs. fecal: Seasonal variation in the diet of wild vervet monkeys from observational and DNA metabarcoding data

Abstract

Assessing the diet of wild animals reveals valuable information about their ecology and trophic relationships that may help elucidate dynamic interactions in ecosystems and forecast responses to environmental changes. Advances in molecular biology provide valuable research tools in this field. However, comparative empirical research is still required to highlight strengths and potential biases of different approaches. Therefore, this study compares environmental DNA and observational methods for the same study population and sampling duration. We employed DNA metabarcoding assays targeting plant and arthropod diet items in 823 fecal samples collected over 12 months in a wild population of an omnivorous primate, the vervet monkey ( Chlorocebus pygerythrus ). DNA metabarcoding data were subsequently compared to direct observations. We observed the same seasonal patterns of plant consumption with both methods; however, DNA metabarcoding showed considerably greater taxonomic coverage and resolution compared to observations, mostly due to the construction of a local plant DNA database. We found a strong effect of season on variation in plant consumption largely shaped by the dry and wet seasons. The seasonal effect on arthropod consumption was weaker, but feeding on arthropods was more frequent in spring and summer, showing overall that vervets adapt their diet according to available resources. The DNA metabarcoding assay outperformed also direct observations of arthropod consumption in both taxonomic coverage and resolution. Combining traditional techniques and DNA metabarcoding data can therefore not only provide enhanced assessments of complex diets and trophic interactions to the benefit of wildlife conservationists and managers but also opens new perspectives for behavioral ecologists studying whether diet variation in social species is induced by environmental differences or might reflect selective foraging behaviors.

Related

  1. Who takes the risk to forage? Testing consistent inter-individual behavioural variation in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)
    Claire Gauquelin Des Pallières, Elena Belli, Fanny Aguilera +6
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyHAL
  2. Can't win, don't try: handling time costs affect foraging choices and vigilance in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)
    A. S. Kang, W. Mutebi, J. A. Teichroeb
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  3. SedaDNA metabarcoding reveals hidden histories of within-species sequence variation
    E. Banos, L. Holman, S. Nogue +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  4. Seasonal and annual variation in Borrelia garinii infectiousness in a wild bird
    Jens Zarka, Dieter Heylen, Manoj Fonville +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyCrossref
  5. Seasonal variation in the density of the Persian leopard in the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran
    Mehdi Tizrouyan, Ali Lotfi, Farid Salmanpour +8
    Global Ecology and ConservationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{brun2026focal,
  title = {{Focal vs. fecal: Seasonal variation in the diet of wild vervet monkeys from observational and DNA metabarcoding data}},
  author = {Loïc Brun and Judith Schneider and Eduard Mas Carrió and Pooja Dongre and Pierre Taberlet and Erica van de Waal and Luca Fumagalli},
  journal = {Ecology and Evolution},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/ece3.9358},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-04894450v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Focal vs. fecal: Seasonal variation in the diet of wild vervet monkeys from observational and DNA metabarcoding data
AU  - Loïc Brun
AU  - Judith Schneider
AU  - Eduard Mas Carrió
AU  - Pooja Dongre
AU  - Pierre Taberlet
AU  - Erica van de Waal
AU  - Luca Fumagalli
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Ecology and Evolution
DO  - 10.1002/ece3.9358
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-04894450v1
AB  - Assessing the diet of wild animals reveals valuable information about their ecology and trophic relationships that may help elucidate dynamic interactions in ecosystems and forecast responses to environmental changes. Advances in molecular biology provide valuable research tools in this field. However, comparative empirical research is still required to highlight strengths and potential biases of different approaches. Therefore, this study compares environmental DNA and observational methods for the same study population and sampling duration. We employed DNA metabarcoding assays targeting plant and arthropod diet items in 823 fecal samples collected over 12 months in a wild population of an omnivorous primate, the vervet monkey ( Chlorocebus pygerythrus ). DNA metabarcoding data were subsequently compared to direct observations. We observed the same seasonal patterns of plant consumption with both methods; however, DNA metabarcoding showed considerably greater taxonomic coverage and resolution compared to observations, mostly due to the construction of a local plant DNA database. We found a strong effect of season on variation in plant consumption largely shaped by the dry and wet seasons. The seasonal effect on arthropod consumption was weaker, but feeding on arthropods was more frequent in spring and summer, showing overall that vervets adapt their diet according to available resources. The DNA metabarcoding assay outperformed also direct observations of arthropod consumption in both taxonomic coverage and resolution. Combining traditional techniques and DNA metabarcoding data can therefore not only provide enhanced assessments of complex diets and trophic interactions to the benefit of wildlife conservationists and managers but also opens new perspectives for behavioral ecologists studying whether diet variation in social species is induced by environmental differences or might reflect selective foraging behaviors.
SN  - 2045-7758
ER  -