Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies

Quantifying evaporation from a large reservoir in the Yellow River Basin: Based on stable isotope methods

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security in Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education; School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China; College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China; Dongying Institute, Shandong Normal University, Dongying, 257092, Shandong, China
  2. 2College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China; Shiyang River Ecological Environment Observation Station, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730070, China; Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Sustainable Development of Oasis, Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730070, China

Abstract

Study region: Liujiaxia Reservoir, a large and highly regulated reservoir in the upper Yellow River Basin, northwestern China. Study focus: Stable water isotopes in precipitation and reservoir surface water were monitored from August 2021 to July 2023. Local evaporation lines (LELs) were used to characterize evaporative enrichment, and the Craig-Gordon isotope mass-balance framework implemented in Hydrocalculator was used to quantify evaporation over inflow ratios (E/I) and their seasonal variability. New hydrological insights for the region: Reservoir water became progressively enriched in δ¹⁸O and δ²H from the inlet toward the outlet and open water sections, indicating cumulative evaporative fractionation. The LEL slope decreased from 8.79 in winter to 3.46 in summer, while isotope derived E/I ranged from 0.41% to 7.82%, with the largest relative evaporation losses occurring in summer. Variability in inlet and outlet water isotopic composition dominated the propagated uncertainty in E/I, emphasizing the importance of representative isotope sampling for constraining evaporation estimates. Stable isotope mass balance therefore provides a useful means of identifying periods of relatively high evaporation loss in large regulated reservoirs and can complement conventional water balance monitoring, although E/I should be interpreted as a relative evaporation loss indicator rather than an absolute evaporation flux.

Related

  1. Modeling of fracture intensity by integrating geostatistical and neural network methods: The asmari reservoir, Rag-e-Sefid Oilfield, SW Iran
    Zahra Tajmir Riahi, Ali Faghih, Bahman Soleimany +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeology & geochemistryCrossref
  2. Efficient dual-mode liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods for quantifying major cyanotoxins in natural water
    Dani Khoury, Christelle Pallez, Sophie Lardy-Fontan +1
    Journal of Chromatography APeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textAnalytical chemistryEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Comparative assessment of thermal methods for quantifying CO
    Majda Pavlin, Sara Tominc, Romana Cerc Korošec
    Results in ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  4. Evaluating Reference Evapotranspiration ( ETo ) Calculation Methods and Quantifying Climate‐Driven Change in Irrigation Demand Across Nepal's Terai
    Umesh Kumar Sujakhu, Rajesh Khatakho, Naresh Suwal +1
    International Journal of ClimatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY9 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  5. Evaporation of cloud particles: solutions to the population balance equation and formulation of memory based bulk schemes (MBBS, v1.0)
    Antonio Torregrosa Abellán, Hannah Bergner, Peter Spichtinger
    EGUspherePreprintCC BY 4.0General earth scienceEGUsphere
BibTeX
@article{qi2026quantifying,
  title = {{Quantifying evaporation from a large reservoir in the Yellow River Basin: Based on stable isotope methods}},
  author = {Xiaoyu Qi and Guofeng Zhu and Rui Li and Zhijie Zheng and Ziwen Liu and Enwei Huang and Yuhao Wang and Yinying Jiao and Yani Gun and Jiangwei Yang},
  journal = {Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104134},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104134},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quantifying evaporation from a large reservoir in the Yellow River Basin: Based on stable isotope methods
AU  - Xiaoyu Qi
AU  - Guofeng Zhu
AU  - Rui Li
AU  - Zhijie Zheng
AU  - Ziwen Liu
AU  - Enwei Huang
AU  - Yuhao Wang
AU  - Yinying Jiao
AU  - Yani Gun
AU  - Jiangwei Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
DO  - 10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104134
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104134
AB  - Study region: Liujiaxia Reservoir, a large and highly regulated reservoir in the upper Yellow River Basin, northwestern China. Study focus: Stable water isotopes in precipitation and reservoir surface water were monitored from August 2021 to July 2023. Local evaporation lines (LELs) were used to characterize evaporative enrichment, and the Craig-Gordon isotope mass-balance framework implemented in Hydrocalculator was used to quantify evaporation over inflow ratios (E/I) and their seasonal variability. New hydrological insights for the region: Reservoir water became progressively enriched in δ¹⁸O and δ²H from the inlet toward the outlet and open water sections, indicating cumulative evaporative fractionation. The LEL slope decreased from 8.79 in winter to 3.46 in summer, while isotope derived E/I ranged from 0.41% to 7.82%, with the largest relative evaporation losses occurring in summer. Variability in inlet and outlet water isotopic composition dominated the propagated uncertainty in E/I, emphasizing the importance of representative isotope sampling for constraining evaporation estimates. Stable isotope mass balance therefore provides a useful means of identifying periods of relatively high evaporation loss in large regulated reservoirs and can complement conventional water balance monitoring, although E/I should be interpreted as a relative evaporation loss indicator rather than an absolute evaporation flux.
SN  - 2214-5818
ER  -