Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYResults in Chemistry

Comparative assessment of thermal methods for quantifying CO

  1. 1Slovenian National and Civil Engineering Institute, Dimičeva 12, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  2. 2Slovenian National and Civil Engineering Institute, Dimičeva 12, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Corresponding author.
  3. 3Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Abstract

Reliable quantification of CO 2 sequestration in alkaline industrial residues remains challenging due to their heterogeneous composition and overlapping thermal decomposition reactions. Co-combustion ash (CCA), steel slag (SS), and stone wool (SW) exhibit high alkalinity and reactive mineral phases, making them promising candidates for mineral carbonation. This study comparatively evaluates the applicability and limitations of the loss on ignition (LOI), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), thermogravimetry coupled with mass spectrometry (TGA-MS), and calcimetry for assessing the CO 2 sequestration capacity in these materials. CCA exhibited the highest CO 2 sequestration capacity, with values of 144.2, 212.6, and 188.7 g CO 2 kg −1 determined by TGA, TGA-MS, and calcimetry, respectively. The corresponding values for SS were 78.7, 87.0, and 91.7 g CO 2 kg −1 , whereas SW showed no measurable CO 2 uptake under the applied carbonation conditions. The larger method-dependent differences observed for CCA resulted primarily from CO 2 evolution below the fixed temperature interval conventionally used for TGA evaluation. TGA-MS directly identified this low-temperature CO 2 release, while quantitative X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinement showed that crystalline carbonate phases did not account for all CO 2 measured by the thermal and chemical methods. Both CCA and SS had undergone partial natural carbonation before treatment, demonstrating the importance of characterising residues in their as-received state. The results show that CO 2 quantification is strongly material-dependent and that complementary thermal, mineralogical, and chemical analyses are needed to identify sources of discrepancy; the study therefore provides a comparative assessment rather than establishing a universally applicable reference method.

Related

  1. Efficient dual-mode liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods for quantifying major cyanotoxins in natural water
    Dani Khoury, Christelle Pallez, Sophie Lardy-Fontan +1
    Journal of Chromatography APeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textAnalytical chemistryEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Quantifying evaporation from a large reservoir in the Yellow River Basin: Based on stable isotope methods
    Xiaoyu Qi, Guofeng Zhu, Rui Li +7
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional StudiesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeology & geochemistryDOAJ
  3. Evaluating Reference Evapotranspiration ( ETo ) Calculation Methods and Quantifying Climate‐Driven Change in Irrigation Demand Across Nepal's Terai
    Umesh Kumar Sujakhu, Rajesh Khatakho, Naresh Suwal +1
    International Journal of ClimatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY9 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  4. A comparative study of methods for calculating the oxidative potential (OP) of atmospheric particulate matter
    Eduardo José dos Santos Souza, Gaëlle Uzu, Khanneh Wadinga Fomba +4
    Environmental Science : AtmospheresPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull text2 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Indoor thermal comfort and natural light in Jute-based versus tarpaulin shelters: a mixed-methods pilot study in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
    Farjana Jahan, Sk.Md. Kamrul Bashar, Abu Mohammed Naser +9
    City and Environment InteractionsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{pavlin2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative assessment of thermal methods for quantifying CO}},
  author = {Majda Pavlin and Sara Tominc and Romana Cerc Korošec},
  journal = {Results in Chemistry},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.rechem.2026.104022},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.104022},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative assessment of thermal methods for quantifying CO
AU  - Majda Pavlin
AU  - Sara Tominc
AU  - Romana Cerc Korošec
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Results in Chemistry
DO  - 10.1016/j.rechem.2026.104022
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.104022
AB  - Reliable quantification of CO 2 sequestration in alkaline industrial residues remains challenging due to their heterogeneous composition and overlapping thermal decomposition reactions. Co-combustion ash (CCA), steel slag (SS), and stone wool (SW) exhibit high alkalinity and reactive mineral phases, making them promising candidates for mineral carbonation. This study comparatively evaluates the applicability and limitations of the loss on ignition (LOI), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), thermogravimetry coupled with mass spectrometry (TGA-MS), and calcimetry for assessing the CO 2 sequestration capacity in these materials. CCA exhibited the highest CO 2 sequestration capacity, with values of 144.2, 212.6, and 188.7 g CO 2 kg −1 determined by TGA, TGA-MS, and calcimetry, respectively. The corresponding values for SS were 78.7, 87.0, and 91.7 g CO 2 kg −1 , whereas SW showed no measurable CO 2 uptake under the applied carbonation conditions. The larger method-dependent differences observed for CCA resulted primarily from CO 2 evolution below the fixed temperature interval conventionally used for TGA evaluation. TGA-MS directly identified this low-temperature CO 2 release, while quantitative X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinement showed that crystalline carbonate phases did not account for all CO 2 measured by the thermal and chemical methods. Both CCA and SS had undergone partial natural carbonation before treatment, demonstrating the importance of characterising residues in their as-received state. The results show that CO 2 quantification is strongly material-dependent and that complementary thermal, mineralogical, and chemical analyses are needed to identify sources of discrepancy; the study therefore provides a comparative assessment rather than establishing a universally applicable reference method.
SN  - 2211-7156
ER  -