LASSBio-classFLOW: A Semiautomated KNIME Workflow for Classification Model Benchmarking and Virtual Screening
- 1Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro , , Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373─Cidade Universitária−CCS , , ,
- 2Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland , , 123 St Stephen’s Green , ,
Abstract
Machine learning-based quantitative structure–activity relationship (ML-QSAR) modeling requires consistent data preparation, validation, and model comparison. We present LASSBio-classFLOW, an open, modular, and semiautomated KNIME workflow for classification-based ligand screening. It integrates basic molecular structure preparation, configurable class assignment, descriptors and fingerprints calculation, dataset partitioning, hyperparameter optimization of nine algorithms, interactive performance evaluation, user-guided model selection, and external-library prediction. As an example, the workflow was evaluated using 1408 ROCK2 compounds from ChEMBL (218 active and 1190 inactive). Models were trained and optimized by fivefold cross-validation and evaluated on a held-out 20% test set. Support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) provided the most consistent results across both stages. On the held-out set, SVM favored active-class precision (0.861), whereas kNN achieved higher active recall (0.750). LASSBio-classFLOW (available at https://github.com/pedrosenamp/LASSBio-classFLOW_v1.0.git) therefore provides a transparent, reusable environment for benchmarking, comparative ML-QSAR development, and flexible deployment, while preserving user control over model selection and screening decisions.
Related
- Development of a Screening Workflow for the Halogenation of Nitrogen Heterocycles with Vanadium-Dependent Haloperoxidases.
- A Validated SEM-EDS Workflow for Screening Rare High-Mg Minerals in Fine-Grained Chang’e-6 Lunar Soil
- AGENTi: APCI-ESI Analyte Ionization Fidelity Pre-Screening Workflow using Multimodel Inference.
- Benchmarking Vision–Language and Vision Foundation Models for Few-Shot Defect Screening in PEM Fuel-Cell SEM Micrographs
- Two barriers to benchmarking structure-based virtual screening against the AcrB efflux pump: a sample-size ceiling and an identifiability failure
BibTeX
@article{pinheiro2026lassbioclassflow,
title = {{LASSBio-classFLOW: A Semiautomated KNIME Workflow for Classification Model Benchmarking and Virtual Screening}},
author = {Pedro de Sena Murteira Pinheiro and Jefferson Muniz Alves da Silva and Bárbara da Silva Mascarenhas de Jesus and Daniel Alencar Rodrigues and Lídia Moreira Lima},
journal = {ACS Omega},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1021/acsomega.6c09298},
url = {https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/11/41/64107/5444587/LASSBio-classFLOW-A-Semiautomated-KNIME-Workflow},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - LASSBio-classFLOW: A Semiautomated KNIME Workflow for Classification Model Benchmarking and Virtual Screening
AU - Pedro de Sena Murteira Pinheiro
AU - Jefferson Muniz Alves da Silva
AU - Bárbara da Silva Mascarenhas de Jesus
AU - Daniel Alencar Rodrigues
AU - Lídia Moreira Lima
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - ACS Omega
DO - 10.1021/acsomega.6c09298
UR - https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/11/41/64107/5444587/LASSBio-classFLOW-A-Semiautomated-KNIME-Workflow
AB - Machine learning-based quantitative structure–activity relationship (ML-QSAR) modeling requires consistent data preparation, validation, and model comparison. We present LASSBio-classFLOW, an open, modular, and semiautomated KNIME workflow for classification-based ligand screening. It integrates basic molecular structure preparation, configurable class assignment, descriptors and fingerprints calculation, dataset partitioning, hyperparameter optimization of nine algorithms, interactive performance evaluation, user-guided model selection, and external-library prediction. As an example, the workflow was evaluated using 1408 ROCK2 compounds from ChEMBL (218 active and 1190 inactive). Models were trained and optimized by fivefold cross-validation and evaluated on a held-out 20% test set. Support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) provided the most consistent results across both stages. On the held-out set, SVM favored active-class precision (0.861), whereas kNN achieved higher active recall (0.750). LASSBio-classFLOW (available at https://github.com/pedrosenamp/LASSBio-classFLOW_v1.0.git) therefore provides a transparent, reusable environment for benchmarking, comparative ML-QSAR development, and flexible deployment, while preserving user control over model selection and screening decisions.
SN - 2470-1343
ER -