Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Capturing the rhythm: methodological choices shape inference from circadian activity data

  1. 1The University of Melbourne

Abstract

1. Statistical tools and analytical decisions for analysing animal activity data are often limited and poorly justified, particularly with respect to model choice, sampling design and temporal aggregation. These shortcomings can constrain our ability to draw accurate and biologically meaningful inferences about behaviour. 2. We interrogated 24 h activity data taken from individual males and females derived from five Drosophila melanogaster populations to generate a general framework for collecting and analysing activity data that systematically compares common model classes, continuous verses fragmented sampling strategies, and alternative temporal aggregation choices (time-bin sizes). 3. Our analyses identified generalised additive mixed models (GAMMs) applied to high-frequency continuous data with small-moderate bin sizes (1-5 minutes) as providing the most robust and interpretable inference for our complex, high-frequency activity data. 4. However, our interrogation of the data set confirmed that analytical and sampling decisions need to be tailored to the study species, the timing of activities and the nature of the behaviour of interest. Accordingly, polynomial and cosinor generalised linear models, increased but biologically targeted snapshot sampling, and bin sizes smaller than one hour yielded adequate analyses with similar biological conclusions when appropriately matched to the system. 5. Our approach provides an accessible decision-making framework for activity analyses that allows researchers across behavioural, ecological and evolutionary studies to justify and optimise choices about data collection and modelling. Such an approach improves the biological relevance of inference and supporting the use of modern tracking and analytical technologies.

Related

  1. All that changes is not shift: methodological choices influence niche shift detection in freshwater invasive species
    Elia Lo Parrino, Mattia Falaschi, Raoul Manenti +1
    EcographyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text23 citedEcologyZoology & animal behaviourHAL
  2. Design and model choices shape inference of age-varying genetic effects on complex traits.
    Tabea Schoeler, Simon Wiegrebe, Thomas W Winkler +1
    Nature agingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  3. Coral connectivity: How biophysical modelling choices shape connectivity inference
    Chinenye Jane Ani, Camille Grimaldi, Takuya Iwanaga +2
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEarthArXiv
  4. A Benchmark of Unsupervised Circadian Phase Inference Methods for Bulk Transcriptomic Data
    S. Purohit, G. R. Grant, T. G. Brooks
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase activity in Palaemon serratus - Methodological optimisation and intrinsic variability
    Marc Rollin, Romain Coulaud, Béatrice Rocher +4
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part A: Molecular and Integrative PhysiologyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text12 citedZoology & animal behaviourPharmacology & toxicologyHAL
BibTeX
@misc{anderson2026capturing,
  title = {{Capturing the rhythm: methodological choices shape inference from circadian activity data}},
  author = {A. M. Anderson and K. B. McNamara and T. M. Jones},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.25.761729},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.25.761729v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Capturing the rhythm: methodological choices shape inference from circadian activity data
AU  - A. M. Anderson
AU  - K. B. McNamara
AU  - T. M. Jones
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.25.761729
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.25.761729v1
AB  - 1. Statistical tools and analytical decisions for analysing animal activity data are often limited and poorly justified, particularly with respect to model choice, sampling design and temporal aggregation. These shortcomings can constrain our ability to draw accurate and biologically meaningful inferences about behaviour. 2. We interrogated 24 h activity data taken from individual males and females derived from five Drosophila melanogaster populations to generate a general framework for collecting and analysing activity data that systematically compares common model classes, continuous verses fragmented sampling strategies, and alternative temporal aggregation choices (time-bin sizes). 3. Our analyses identified generalised additive mixed models (GAMMs) applied to high-frequency continuous data with small-moderate bin sizes (1-5 minutes) as providing the most robust and interpretable inference for our complex, high-frequency activity data. 4. However, our interrogation of the data set confirmed that analytical and sampling decisions need to be tailored to the study species, the timing of activities and the nature of the behaviour of interest. Accordingly, polynomial and cosinor generalised linear models, increased but biologically targeted snapshot sampling, and bin sizes smaller than one hour yielded adequate analyses with similar biological conclusions when appropriately matched to the system. 5. Our approach provides an accessible decision-making framework for activity analyses that allows researchers across behavioural, ecological and evolutionary studies to justify and optimise choices about data collection and modelling. Such an approach improves the biological relevance of inference and supporting the use of modern tracking and analytical technologies.
ER  -