Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Cross-Moment Consistency and the Fifth Adler Coefficient in Hadronic Tau Decays

Abstract

The unknown coefficient c5,1 controls the first omitted fifth-order term in fixed-order analyses of inclusive hadronic τ decays. We determine what the four known Adler coefficients can actually test. For any normalized polynomial weight, the fixed-order Adler-to-moment map is triangular with unit diagonal. Hence one common Adler-coefficient error reaches every moment with the same absolute size, and a multi-weight relative test reduces to one absolute tolerance. For three representative weights, a ten-percent test resolves c5,1 only to about ±24; the closest contour-improved test is weaker by more than an order of magnitude. Moreover, any continuation that preserves the observed sign of the direct Padé/Shanks defects gives c5,1≥378.03, so values near $280$ require additional structure. A calibration-and-falsification protocol applied to a simplified Beneke--Jamin-type pure-power ansatz gives the conditional estimate c5,1=248±30 (struct)±74 (method)=248±80. At the physical order its central value coincides algebraically with the exact four-parameter fit; the protocol adds a falsifiable admissibility test and a method uncertainty, not new coefficient information. We also clarify that the often-quoted Beneke--Jamin value $283$ is a linear extrapolation of total-width FOPT te

Related

  1. Hadronic heavy neutral lepton decays to the limit
    Jonathan L. Schubert, Babette Döbrich
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Rethinking search signatures: Hadronic decays of GeV-scale feebly coupled particles
    Viktor Kryshtal, Maksym Ovchynnikov
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Anomalies in Hadronic B → VV Decays
    Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya, Marianne Bouchard, Alexandre Jean +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Pretraining on boosted boson decays for polarization tagging of hadronic W bosons
    Saptaparna Bhattacharya
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Impact of Hadronic Resonances on B→ K(*)τ+τ- Decays
    Guillermo Baltà, Andreas Crivellin, Rafel Escribano +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{abbas2026crossmoment,
  title = {{Cross-Moment Consistency and the Fifth Adler Coefficient in Hadronic Tau Decays}},
  author = {Gauhar Abbas and Debabina Biswas and Pratham Dadhich and Vartika Singh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.06824},
  eprint = {2611.06824},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06824},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cross-Moment Consistency and the Fifth Adler Coefficient in Hadronic Tau Decays
AU  - Gauhar Abbas
AU  - Debabina Biswas
AU  - Pratham Dadhich
AU  - Vartika Singh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.06824
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06824
AB  - The unknown coefficient c_5,1 controls the first omitted fifth-order term in fixed-order analyses of inclusive hadronic τ decays. We determine what the four known Adler coefficients can actually test. For any normalized polynomial weight, the fixed-order Adler-to-moment map is triangular with unit diagonal. Hence one common Adler-coefficient error reaches every moment with the same absolute size, and a multi-weight relative test reduces to one absolute tolerance. For three representative weights, a ten-percent test resolves c_5,1 only to about ±24; the closest contour-improved test is weaker by more than an order of magnitude. Moreover, any continuation that preserves the observed sign of the direct Padé/Shanks defects gives c_5,1≥378.03, so values near $280$ require additional structure. A calibration-and-falsification protocol applied to a simplified Beneke--Jamin-type pure-power ansatz gives the conditional estimate c_5,1=248±30 (struct)±74 (method)=248±80. At the physical order its central value coincides algebraically with the exact four-parameter fit; the protocol adds a falsifiable admissibility test and a method uncertainty, not new coefficient information. We also clarify that the often-quoted Beneke--Jamin value $283$ is a linear extrapolation of total-width FOPT te
ER  -