Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC pregnancy and childbirth

Combined albumin-adjusted ischemia-modified albumin ratio and uterine artery Doppler for differentiating early-onset preeclampsia from gestational hypertension: a prospective exploratory pilot study.

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SBÜ Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. [email protected].
  2. 2Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Esenyurt Necmi Kadıoğlu State Hospital, Esenyurt District, Istanbul, 34517, Turkey. [email protected].
  3. 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SBÜ Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Abstract

Background

Distinguishing early-onset preeclampsia (EO-PE) from gestational hypertension (GHT) at initial presentation remains challenging, particularly when classical diagnostic features are absent or evolving. We evaluated whether combining the albumin-adjusted ischemia-modified albumin ratio (IMAR) with uterine artery pulsatility index expressed as multiples of the median (UtA-PI MoM) provides complementary information in this setting.Methods

In this prospective single-center exploratory study, 90 singleton pregnancies (30 EO-PE, 30 GHT, 30 controls) were included. IMAR and UtA-PI MoM were assessed individually and in combination using receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression with bootstrap internal validation.Results

IMAR and UtA-PI MoM were higher in EO-PE than in GHT (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas raw IMA did not distinguish the groups. IMAR demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.727, 95% CI 0.600-0.854), and UtA-PI MoM demonstrated higher performance (AUC 0.844, 95% CI 0.743-0.946). The combined model showed the highest apparent discrimination (AUC 0.898, 95% CI 0.818-0.977; optimism-corrected AUC 0.889), with 83.3% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity at the exploratory operating point.Conclusions

Combining IMAR with UtA-PI MoM may provide complementary information for distinguishing EO-PE from GHT at initial presentation. This exploratory model is not intended to replace established angiogenic biomarkers and requires validation in larger, multicenter studies before clinical application.

Related

  1. Molecular clues to the rescue: differentiating gestational and non-gestational ovarian choriocarcinoma-a case report.
    Ritwika Choudhury, Mansi Sharma, Bhumi Agarwal +2
    Journal of medical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  2. Maternal Circulating Angiogenic Biomarkers for Predicting Fetal Growth Restriction and Small-for-Gestational-Age Birth Without Preeclampsia
    Min-A Kim, Eunju Lee, Hye Sun Lee +1
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion in Multiparametric Prostate MRI: An Exploratory Intra-Patient Study Differentiating Malignant Lesions from Normal Tissue
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Predictors of Preeclampsia and Pregnancy Associated Outcomes Among Pregnant Women: A Prospective Cohort Study in Selected Hospitals in Kiambu County, Kenya
    J. Mukala
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  5. Transient Gestational Hypertension and Its Subsequent Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes.
    Nicolás García, Paulino Vigil-De Gracia
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ozbey2026combined,
  title = {{Combined albumin-adjusted ischemia-modified albumin ratio and uterine artery Doppler for differentiating early-onset preeclampsia from gestational hypertension: a prospective exploratory pilot study.}},
  author = {Serkan Özbey and Handan Turhan Karakuş and Alper Gümüş and Pakizer Banu Kılıçoğlu Dane},
  journal = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12884-026-09700-2},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897499},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Combined albumin-adjusted ischemia-modified albumin ratio and uterine artery Doppler for differentiating early-onset preeclampsia from gestational hypertension: a prospective exploratory pilot study.
AU  - Serkan Özbey
AU  - Handan Turhan Karakuş
AU  - Alper Gümüş
AU  - Pakizer Banu Kılıçoğlu Dane
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC pregnancy and childbirth
DO  - 10.1186/s12884-026-09700-2
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897499
AB  - Background  Distinguishing early-onset preeclampsia (EO-PE) from gestational hypertension (GHT) at initial presentation remains challenging, particularly when classical diagnostic features are absent or evolving. We evaluated whether combining the albumin-adjusted ischemia-modified albumin ratio (IMAR) with uterine artery pulsatility index expressed as multiples of the median (UtA-PI MoM) provides complementary information in this setting.Methods  In this prospective single-center exploratory study, 90 singleton pregnancies (30 EO-PE, 30 GHT, 30 controls) were included. IMAR and UtA-PI MoM were assessed individually and in combination using receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression with bootstrap internal validation.Results  IMAR and UtA-PI MoM were higher in EO-PE than in GHT (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas raw IMA did not distinguish the groups. IMAR demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.727, 95% CI 0.600-0.854), and UtA-PI MoM demonstrated higher performance (AUC 0.844, 95% CI 0.743-0.946). The combined model showed the highest apparent discrimination (AUC 0.898, 95% CI 0.818-0.977; optimism-corrected AUC 0.889), with 83.3% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity at the exploratory operating point.Conclusions  Combining IMAR with UtA-PI MoM may provide complementary information for distinguishing EO-PE from GHT at initial presentation. This exploratory model is not intended to replace established angiogenic biomarkers and requires validation in larger, multicenter studies before clinical application.
SN  - 1471-2393
ER  -