Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYEstuaries and coasts : journal of the Estuarine Research Federation

Drivers of Ecosystem Metabolism in an Anthropogenically Modified Delta.

  1. 1Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
  2. 2San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA 94804 USA.
  3. 3California Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA USA.

Abstract

Estuaries are under threat globally from a wide range of stressors, with rates of ecosystem metabolism - respiration (R), gross primary production (GPP), and net ecosystem metabolism (NEM) - representing a way for resource managers to quantify their impacts. In this study, we assessed how natural and anthropogenic stressors have altered metabolism within the extensively modified Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta ("Delta") in California, USA. Metabolism was estimated using a diel open-water technique utilizing dissolved oxygen measurements from a high frequency (15 min) water quality monitoring array, and spanned 6 sites across 11 years (2014-2025). Our analyses were driven by a conceptual model of Delta carbon (C) cycling focused on 1) Invasive aquatic vegetation (IAV), 2) Phytoplankton, 3) Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) upgrades, 4) Large-scale flow alterations, and 5) Wet vs. dry years. We found that allochthonous C fuels net heterotrophy in the outer riverine sections of the Delta, while the heavily vegetated central Delta produces autochthonous C remineralized elsewhere in the system. IAV were the dominant primary producers, with low phytoplankton production except during a historic bloom. WWTP upgrades imparted negligible changes to metabolism, with low chlorophyll a (< 5 µg L⁻¹) both before and after. Introduction of a flow barrier - a management response to drought - hydrodynamically isolated deep-water channels from nearby shallow areas, resulting in decreased metabolism indicative of changes to C transport. Contrary to past research, low rainfall years were associated with increased metabolism. This study demonstrates how multi-sensor arrays can be used to quantify ecosystem responses to major environmental stressors.Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-026-01833-z.

Related

  1. Unraveling nonlinear ecosystem water use efficiency dynamics and environmental drivers across Iran using remote sensing and XGBoost-SHAP
    Majid Kazemzadeh
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  2. Drivers of forest loss and habitat degradation in Zambia’s Greater Kafue Ecosystem
    Gift Mulenga, Darius Phiri, Matamyo Simwanda +1
    Discover ForestsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  3. Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of forest ecosystem service value in China based on the equivalent factor method
    Qi Shi, Chuan Ye
    Frontiers in Forests and Global ChangePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  4. Anthropogenically induced shifts in sediment vegetation impact coastal benthic microbiomes
    Borja Aldeguer-Riquelme, Meagan A Beatty, Luis H Orellana +5
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textEcologyMicrobiologyHAL
  5. Indicator Delta Scaling (IDS): Rethinking bias adjustment for climate risk indicators
    Jesús Peña-Izquierdo, Sascha Hofmann, Victor Estella-Perez +3
    EGUspherePreprintCC BY 4.0General earth scienceEGUsphere
BibTeX
@article{volaric2026drivers,
  title = {{Drivers of Ecosystem Metabolism in an Anthropogenically Modified Delta.}},
  author = {Martin P Volaric and Brian A Bergamaschi and Ariella Chelsky and David B Senn and Stephen G Monismith},
  journal = {Estuaries and coasts : journal of the Estuarine Research Federation},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s12237-026-01833-z},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927030},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Drivers of Ecosystem Metabolism in an Anthropogenically Modified Delta.
AU  - Martin P Volaric
AU  - Brian A Bergamaschi
AU  - Ariella Chelsky
AU  - David B Senn
AU  - Stephen G Monismith
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Estuaries and coasts : journal of the Estuarine Research Federation
DO  - 10.1007/s12237-026-01833-z
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927030
AB  - Estuaries are under threat globally from a wide range of stressors, with rates of ecosystem metabolism - respiration (R), gross primary production (GPP), and net ecosystem metabolism (NEM) - representing a way for resource managers to quantify their impacts. In this study, we assessed how natural and anthropogenic stressors have altered metabolism within the extensively modified Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta ("Delta") in California, USA. Metabolism was estimated using a diel open-water technique utilizing dissolved oxygen measurements from a high frequency (15 min) water quality monitoring array, and spanned 6 sites across 11 years (2014-2025). Our analyses were driven by a conceptual model of Delta carbon (C) cycling focused on 1) Invasive aquatic vegetation (IAV), 2) Phytoplankton, 3) Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) upgrades, 4) Large-scale flow alterations, and 5) Wet vs. dry years. We found that allochthonous C fuels net heterotrophy in the outer riverine sections of the Delta, while the heavily vegetated central Delta produces autochthonous C remineralized elsewhere in the system. IAV were the dominant primary producers, with low phytoplankton production except during a historic bloom. WWTP upgrades imparted negligible changes to metabolism, with low chlorophyll a (< 5 µg L⁻¹) both before and after. Introduction of a flow barrier - a management response to drought - hydrodynamically isolated deep-water channels from nearby shallow areas, resulting in decreased metabolism indicative of changes to C transport. Contrary to past research, low rainfall years were associated with increased metabolism. This study demonstrates how multi-sensor arrays can be used to quantify ecosystem responses to major environmental stressors.Supplementary information  The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-026-01833-z.
SN  - 1559-2723
SN  - 1559-2731
ER  -