PreprintAll rights reservedmedRxiv
CPT/HCPCS Code Recommendation from Clinical Notes: A Comparative Evaluation of AI Methods
- 1Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Related
- Evaluation of Tooth Shade Selection With Conventional Methods and Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Methods: A Comparative Study
- Comparative evaluation of crushing methods on the deagglomeration and enhanced properties of reclaimed asphalt pavement
- Empirical Evaluation of Post Hoc Interpretability Methods for Clinical Trust in Deep Learning Diagnostics
- Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Interfaces in Third Molar Surgery Complication Scenarios: Response Quality, Clinical Content, Potential Clinical Risk, Readability, and Externally Observable Response Latency—A Cross-Sectional Comparative Benchmark Study
- Development and expert evaluation of a culturally adapted large language model for Malay clinical history-taking simulation: mixed methods study
BibTeX
@misc{song2026cpthcpcs,
title = {{CPT/HCPCS Code Recommendation from Clinical Notes: A Comparative Evaluation of AI Methods}},
author = {Q. Song and C. Ni and W. Liu and Y. Li and B. A. Malin and Z. Yin},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.29.26361731},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.29.26361731v1},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - CPT/HCPCS Code Recommendation from Clinical Notes: A Comparative Evaluation of AI Methods
AU - Q. Song
AU - C. Ni
AU - W. Liu
AU - Y. Li
AU - B. A. Malin
AU - Z. Yin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/29
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.29.26361731
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.29.26361731v1
ER -