Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Interfaces in Third Molar Surgery Complication Scenarios:…

Quality, Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of AI Chatbots’ Responses to Dental Patient Questions: A Comparative Evaluation
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
Quality, Readability, and Content Deficiencies of Three Large Language Models in Bee Sting Health Information: A Comparative Evaluation with Patient Perspectives
R. Xu, L. Yang, X. Zhang +3
medRxiv29 Sep 2026PreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
Comparative evaluation of large language models for esophageal cancer patient education: quality, reliability, readability, understandability, and actionability.
Ying Ying Hang, Rui Yuan, Man Lu +4
Frontiers in medicine14 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
Patient-facing large language model assistants for chronic constipation education: A comparative study of expert evaluation, readability, and patient acceptability
Yanfen Gu MSc, Shiqi Qiang MSc, Zehui Xu PhD +4
Digital Health24 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
Quality and Readability of ChatGPT and Gemini Responses to Patient Questions About Systemic Isotretinoin: Comparative Evaluation Study.
Elif Bal Avcı, Buğra Burç Dağtaş, Dilara İlhan Erdil +4
JMIR dermatology30 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC

Cite

BibTeX

@article{anon2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Interfaces in Third Molar Surgery Complication Scenarios: Response Quality, Clinical Content, Potential Clinical Risk, Readability, and Externally Observable Response Latency—A Cross-Sectional Comparative Benchmark Study}},
  journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666355},
  note = {CC BY},
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Interfaces in Third Molar Surgery Complication Scenarios: Response Quality, Clinical Content, Potential Clinical Risk, Readability, and Externally Observable Response Latency—A Cross-Sectional Comparative Benchmark Study
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
JO  - Journal of clinical medicine
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666355
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -

Related

Cite