Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Methodological Impacts on Microbiome Structure and Indicator Status in the Human Lower Respiratory Tract

  1. 1University of British Columbia

Abstract

Rationale: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally, and rising incidence among traditionally low-risk individuals intensifies the need for improved early-detection methods that the lower-airway microbiome may inform. Objectives: To evaluate how respiratory tract sampling method shapes inferred microbiome structure, and whether bronchial brushing recovers a microbial community ecologically distinct from BAL and oral rinse. Methods: A pilot cohort of 33 participants (8 lung cancer, 25 non-cancer controls) underwent oral rinse, bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and bronchial brushing. Microbiome structure was characterized by small subunit ribosomal rRNA gene amplicon sequence variant (ASV) profiling, with indicator-species analysis and SPIEC-EASI correlation-network mapping used to identify ASVs associated with sample type or cancer status. Measurements and Main Results: Sampling method was the dominant variation axis. BAL communities closely resembled oral rinse (64 jointly indicative ASVs; none shared with brushing), whereas bronchial brushing yielded a distinct but low-biomass signal. After excluding host-derived sequences, a single brush-specific indicator ASV affiliated with Sphingomonadaceae was identified within a 17-node co-occurrence module. Cancer-status effects were not detectable, consistent with limited statistical power. Conclusions: Sampling method is the primary determinant of inferred lower respiratory microbiome structure. Bronchial brushing recovers a distinct but low-biomass signal that is obscured when BAL is used in isolation. However, overlap between this low-biomass signal with host and contaminant sequences indicates that confidently resolving a core microbiome will require deeper sequencing and dedicated contamination controls. These methodological findings directly inform the design of future lung cancer- and disease-association studies.

Related

  1. The infant nasopharyngeal microbiome impacts severity of lower respiratory infection and risk of asthma development
    P. D. Sly, P. G. Holt, K. E. Holt +15
    Cell Host and MicrobePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text950 citedMicrobiologyHAL
  2. Wheat Ear Microbiome State as a Transferable Indicator of Within-Season Mycotoxin Risk
    Oluwatobi Kolawole, Anne D. van Diepeningen, Josipa Grzetic Martens +3
    Microbial EcologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyPMC
  3. Snail Inventories for Short‐Term Impacts: Methodological Differences and Their Underlying Causes
    Nóra Kriston‐Kőműves, Roland Farkas, Zoltán Barta
    Ecology and evolutionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Benchmarking Microbiome Methods for Improved Metagenomic Sequencing of Lower Respiratory Tract Samples
    J. T. Sumner, E. M. Hartmann
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  5. Predicting climate-change impacts on the global glacier-fed stream microbiome
    Massimo Bourquin, Hannes Peter, Grégoire Michoud +9
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text16 citedEcologyClimate scienceHAL
BibTeX
@misc{noonan2026methodological,
  title = {{Methodological Impacts on Microbiome Structure and Indicator Status in the Human Lower Respiratory Tract}},
  author = {A. J. C. Noonan and R. Myers and R. J. McLaughlin and A. Nag and S. Chen and C. Bartolomeu and S. A. Borden and S. Lam and S. Hallam},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.02.742334},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.02.742334v2},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Methodological Impacts on Microbiome Structure and Indicator Status in the Human Lower Respiratory Tract
AU  - A. J. C. Noonan
AU  - R. Myers
AU  - R. J. McLaughlin
AU  - A. Nag
AU  - S. Chen
AU  - C. Bartolomeu
AU  - S. A. Borden
AU  - S. Lam
AU  - S. Hallam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/02
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.02.742334
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.02.742334v2
AB  - Rationale: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally, and rising incidence among traditionally low-risk individuals intensifies the need for improved early-detection methods that the lower-airway microbiome may inform. Objectives: To evaluate how respiratory tract sampling method shapes inferred microbiome structure, and whether bronchial brushing recovers a microbial community ecologically distinct from BAL and oral rinse. Methods: A pilot cohort of 33 participants (8 lung cancer, 25 non-cancer controls) underwent oral rinse, bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and bronchial brushing. Microbiome structure was characterized by small subunit ribosomal rRNA gene amplicon sequence variant (ASV) profiling, with indicator-species analysis and SPIEC-EASI correlation-network mapping used to identify ASVs associated with sample type or cancer status. Measurements and Main Results: Sampling method was the dominant variation axis. BAL communities closely resembled oral rinse (64 jointly indicative ASVs; none shared with brushing), whereas bronchial brushing yielded a distinct but low-biomass signal. After excluding host-derived sequences, a single brush-specific indicator ASV affiliated with Sphingomonadaceae was identified within a 17-node co-occurrence module. Cancer-status effects were not detectable, consistent with limited statistical power. Conclusions: Sampling method is the primary determinant of inferred lower respiratory microbiome structure. Bronchial brushing recovers a distinct but low-biomass signal that is obscured when BAL is used in isolation. However, overlap between this low-biomass signal with host and contaminant sequences indicates that confidently resolving a core microbiome will require deeper sequencing and dedicated contamination controls. These methodological findings directly inform the design of future lung cancer- and disease-association studies.
ER  -