Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

When quantum field theory kicks in: the relation between matter, gravity and energy

Abstract

The existence of energy is the main criterion for (i) providing a common core to the materiality of all types of classical matter and (ii) denying that the gravitational field of General Relativity is a type of matter. Extending this criterion to quantum field theory, though formally straightforward, carries new conceptual consequences for the interpretation of gravity. Renormalization of the quantum matter stress-energy tensor forces a local, purely geometric term, built from the metric alone, into the conserved stress-energy, and this has two faces. It grants the metric a material significance alongside its spatio-temporal one (the egalitarian view); and it binds gravitational to non-gravitational energy so tightly that the two cannot be split apart without a choice of vacuum that a generic spacetime does not supply (the unificationist view). The latter poses a dilemma: either gravitational energy is meaningless, but then so is the energy of the non-gravitational quantum fields, and only classical fields remain matter; or both are meaningful, and the metric thereby acquires the material significance of a matter field. On neither horn does the classical divide between matter and spacetime survive quantization.

Related

  1. A novel phenomenological parametrization of dynamical dark energy via matter-gravity coupling
    Hrishikesh Chakrabarty, Daniele Malafarina
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  2. Linear perturbation theory and structure formation in a Horndeski theory of gravity without dark matter
    Lorenzo Gervani, Antonaldo Diaferio, Francesco Pace
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Energy-momentum-squared gravity: charged quark star solutions with unified interacting matter
    Ayan Banerjee, Bobur Turimov, Javlon Rayimbaev +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. A quantum theory of gravity
    Antonio Peña Peña
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsarXiv
  5. Emergent gravity from topological quantum field theory: Stochastic gradient flow perspective away from the quantum gravity problem
    Andrea Addazi, Salvatore Capozzıello, Jinglong Liu +3
    Physics Letters BPeer-reviewedCC BY13 citedStatistical & nonlinear physicsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{ferreiro2026when,
  title = {{When quantum field theory kicks in: the relation between matter, gravity and energy}},
  author = {Antonio Ferreiro and Andrea Cavallaro},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.10588},
  eprint = {2610.10588},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10588},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When quantum field theory kicks in: the relation between matter, gravity and energy
AU  - Antonio Ferreiro
AU  - Andrea Cavallaro
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.10588
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10588
AB  - The existence of energy is the main criterion for (i) providing a common core to the materiality of all types of classical matter and (ii) denying that the gravitational field of General Relativity is a type of matter. Extending this criterion to quantum field theory, though formally straightforward, carries new conceptual consequences for the interpretation of gravity. Renormalization of the quantum matter stress-energy tensor forces a local, purely geometric term, built from the metric alone, into the conserved stress-energy, and this has two faces. It grants the metric a material significance alongside its spatio-temporal one (the egalitarian view); and it binds gravitational to non-gravitational energy so tightly that the two cannot be split apart without a choice of vacuum that a generic spacetime does not supply (the unificationist view). The latter poses a dilemma: either gravitational energy is meaningless, but then so is the energy of the non-gravitational quantum fields, and only classical fields remain matter; or both are meaningful, and the metric thereby acquires the material significance of a matter field. On neither horn does the classical divide between matter and spacetime survive quantization.
ER  -