High- versus low-anthropomorphic-cue packages and health-information trust: social presence and source credibility under explicit AI disclosure
- 1Journalism and Communication School, Qilu Institute of Technology , ,
Abstract
Background: AI virtual opinion leaders are increasingly used in health communication, but it remains unclear whether bundled anthropomorphic-cue packages foster initial trust and information-adoption intention when AI identity is explicitly disclosed.
Methods: Guided by the Computers Are Social Actors paradigm, Social Presence Theory, Source Credibility Theory, and the Information Adoption Model, we conducted a single-factor between-subjects randomized experiment comparing overall high- and low-anthropomorphic-cue packages. The packages differed simultaneously in avatar realism, gesture behavior, interpersonal/linguistic framing, and video duration; AI disclosure and the response-button structure were held constant. A total of 536 valid responses were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Social presence, source credibility, trust, and adoption intention were measured by participant self-report immediately after a single branched-video exposure.
Results: The overall high-versus-low package contrast increased social presence. Social presence was positively associated with source credibility; source credibility was positively associated with trust in AI-generated health information; and information trust was positively associated with health information adoption intention. The direct effect of the package contrast on information trust was not significant, whereas the bootstrapped serial indirect effect through social presence and source credibility was significant.
Conclusion: Within the present Chinese sample and single-exposure setting, the randomized contrast supports an effect of the overall cue package on initial social presence, while the mediation estimates are consistent with the hypothesized indirect pathway to information trust. The design cannot identify the independent contribution of any visual, gestural, linguistic, vocal, interactive, or duration component. The outcome is self-reported adoption intention, not observed health behavior.
Related
- Understanding interpretations of credibility, health literacy and health information seeking in Black and South Asian ethnic communities in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study
- Perspectives of European Nutrition Professionals on Healthy Eating Policies: An International Comparative Study of Implementation Gaps and Information Credibility
- Exploring perspectives on implementing cervical length screening to prevent preterm birth in nulliparous women: protocol for the PRE-EMPT qualitative work packages
- Climate education's credibility trap: When alarm undermines action
- The Gendered Credibility Paradox of Suicide: A Teaching Case from Brigitte Bardot’s La Vérité
BibTeX
@article{huo2026high,
title = {{High- versus low-anthropomorphic-cue packages and health-information trust: social presence and source credibility under explicit AI disclosure}},
author = {Shaohua Huo and Zhenfen Li and Yuqi Lin},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1938022},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13662049},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - High- versus low-anthropomorphic-cue packages and health-information trust: social presence and source credibility under explicit AI disclosure
AU - Shaohua Huo
AU - Zhenfen Li
AU - Yuqi Lin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - Frontiers in public health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1938022
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13662049
AB - Background: AI virtual opinion leaders are increasingly used in health communication, but it remains unclear whether bundled anthropomorphic-cue packages foster initial trust and information-adoption intention when AI identity is explicitly disclosed. Methods: Guided by the Computers Are Social Actors paradigm, Social Presence Theory, Source Credibility Theory, and the Information Adoption Model, we conducted a single-factor between-subjects randomized experiment comparing overall high- and low-anthropomorphic-cue packages. The packages differed simultaneously in avatar realism, gesture behavior, interpersonal/linguistic framing, and video duration; AI disclosure and the response-button structure were held constant. A total of 536 valid responses were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Social presence, source credibility, trust, and adoption intention were measured by participant self-report immediately after a single branched-video exposure. Results: The overall high-versus-low package contrast increased social presence. Social presence was positively associated with source credibility; source credibility was positively associated with trust in AI-generated health information; and information trust was positively associated with health information adoption intention. The direct effect of the package contrast on information trust was not significant, whereas the bootstrapped serial indirect effect through social presence and source credibility was significant. Conclusion: Within the present Chinese sample and single-exposure setting, the randomized contrast supports an effect of the overall cue package on initial social presence, while the mediation estimates are consistent with the hypothesized indirect pathway to information trust. The design cannot identify the independent contribution of any visual, gestural, linguistic, vocal, interactive, or duration component. The outcome is self-reported adoption intention, not observed health behavior.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -