Comparative Effects of Different Mind-Body Exercises on Lung Function, Exercise Capacity, and Quality of Life in Adults with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
- 1School of Physical Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430068, People’s Republic of China
- 2School of Physical Education, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450046, People’s Republic of China
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This review evaluated the effects of different mind-body exercises (MBEs) on lung function (LF), exercise capacity (EC), and quality of life (QoL) in adults with stable COPD using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Eight English and Chinese databases were searched through April 21, 2026. Randomized controlled trials comparing Ba Duan Jin (BDJ), Yi Jin Jing (YJJ), yoga, Liu Zi Jue (LZJ), Tai Chi (TC), and Wu Qin Xi (WQX) with usual care (UC) were included. Outcomes included FEV1, FEV1%pred, FEV1/FVC, FVC, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Bayesian NMA was conducted using R. A total of 111 RCTs involving 9,240 participants were included. Most trials compared individual MBEs with UC, with limited direct head-to-head comparisons among different MBEs. Different MBE modalities showed potential benefits across LF, EC, and QoL outcomes, although effects varied by outcome. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking, Yoga ranked highest for FEV1 (mean difference [MD] = 0.48, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.11, 0.85) and FVC (MD = 0.46, 95% CrI: 0.09, 0.83), whereas WQX ranked highest for FEV1/FVC (MD = 8.38, 95% CrI: 4.59, 12.3) and FEV1%pred (MD = 10.2, 95% CrI: 5.25, 15.35). WQX ranked highest for 6MWD, whereas Yoga, TC, and YJJ showed favorable rankings for some QoL-related outcomes. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because some interventions were supported by a relatively small number of trials with varying certainty of evidence and potential risk of bias, and the included trials were predominantly conducted in China. MBEs may improve LF, EC, and QoL in adults with stable COPD. Different MBEs showed potential benefits for specific outcomes. However, comparative effects remain uncertain due to limited direct evidence, unequal numbers of available trials, and variability in evidence certainty. Further high-quality head-to-head RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
Related
- Effects of different doses of N-acetylcysteine on lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis
- Comparative effects of different exercise training modalities on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Comparative Real-World Effectiveness of Dupilumab, Mepolizumab, and Benralizumab in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.
- Three Systemic Comorbidity Axes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Web of Science Core Collection, 2005-2026.
- Comparative Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and DPP-4 Inhibitors on Sepsis in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study
BibTeX
@article{ma2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative Effects of Different Mind-Body Exercises on Lung Function, Exercise Capacity, and Quality of Life in Adults with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis}},
author = {Mingyu Ma and Dansong Liu and Xiaojuan Li and Jing Shang and Wentao Su},
journal = {International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2147/copd.s643538},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s643538},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Effects of Different Mind-Body Exercises on Lung Function, Exercise Capacity, and Quality of Life in Adults with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
AU - Mingyu Ma
AU - Dansong Liu
AU - Xiaojuan Li
AU - Jing Shang
AU - Wentao Su
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
DO - 10.2147/copd.s643538
UR - https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s643538
AB - Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This review evaluated the effects of different mind-body exercises (MBEs) on lung function (LF), exercise capacity (EC), and quality of life (QoL) in adults with stable COPD using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Eight English and Chinese databases were searched through April 21, 2026. Randomized controlled trials comparing Ba Duan Jin (BDJ), Yi Jin Jing (YJJ), yoga, Liu Zi Jue (LZJ), Tai Chi (TC), and Wu Qin Xi (WQX) with usual care (UC) were included. Outcomes included FEV1, FEV1%pred, FEV1/FVC, FVC, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Bayesian NMA was conducted using R. A total of 111 RCTs involving 9,240 participants were included. Most trials compared individual MBEs with UC, with limited direct head-to-head comparisons among different MBEs. Different MBE modalities showed potential benefits across LF, EC, and QoL outcomes, although effects varied by outcome. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking, Yoga ranked highest for FEV1 (mean difference [MD] = 0.48, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.11, 0.85) and FVC (MD = 0.46, 95% CrI: 0.09, 0.83), whereas WQX ranked highest for FEV1/FVC (MD = 8.38, 95% CrI: 4.59, 12.3) and FEV1%pred (MD = 10.2, 95% CrI: 5.25, 15.35). WQX ranked highest for 6MWD, whereas Yoga, TC, and YJJ showed favorable rankings for some QoL-related outcomes. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because some interventions were supported by a relatively small number of trials with varying certainty of evidence and potential risk of bias, and the included trials were predominantly conducted in China. MBEs may improve LF, EC, and QoL in adults with stable COPD. Different MBEs showed potential benefits for specific outcomes. However, comparative effects remain uncertain due to limited direct evidence, unequal numbers of available trials, and variability in evidence certainty. Further high-quality head-to-head RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
SN - 1176-9106
SN - 1178-2005
ER -