Comparative effects of different exercise training modalities on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- 2School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- 3Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- 4Wei Zhang Famous Traditional Chinese Medicine Expert Inheritance Studio, Shanghai Baoshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- 5Institute of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
Introduction
Exercise training is central to pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease (ILD), but the comparative effects of different exercise modalities remain uncertain. We compared their effects on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and health-related quality of life.Methods
Six databases were searched from inception to June 11, 2026. Randomized controlled trials of exercise training in adults with ILD were included. Interventions were classified as aerobic training (AER), aerobic plus resistance training (AER_RES), respiratory-focused training comprising breathing exercises or inspiratory muscle training (BREATH_IMT), aerobic plus resistance plus breathing training (AER_RES_BREATH), mind-body exercise (MIND_BODY), or control (CON). Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses evaluated changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), percentage predicted forced vital capacity (FVC% predicted), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RoB 2 and CINeMA were used to assess risk of bias and confidence in the evidence.Results
Twenty-six trials involving 1,409 participants were included. Compared with CON, all active modalities improved 6MWD, with MDs ranging from 29.46 m for AER (95% CI 11.82-47.10) to 57.12 m for AER_RES_BREATH (95% CI 41.76-72.48). AER_RES_BREATH produced greater estimated improvements than AER (MD 27.67 m, 95% CI 4.25-51.08) and AER_RES (MD 25.18 m, 95% CI 6.69-43.68), although these comparisons relied mainly on indirect evidence. Only AER_RES_BREATH showed a small improvement in FVC% predicted versus CON (MD 3.08 percentage points, 95% CI 0.05-6.12), with limited robustness and low confidence. AER_RES, AER_RES_BREATH, and MIND_BODY improved SGRQ total scores (MDs 10.08-15.20 points). Findings for 6MWD were the most robust across sensitivity analyses.Discussion
Exercise training improves functional exercise capacity and may improve health-related quality of life in adults with ILD. AER_RES_BREATH showed the strongest signal for 6MWD, but limited direct comparisons preclude its designation as the optimal intervention. Evidence for FVC% predicted was less robust and should not be interpreted as evidence of disease modification.Systematic review registration
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261399024, identifier PROSPERO CRD420261399024.
Related
- Comparative effects of different exercise modalities and doses on lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with Bayesian dose-response network meta-analysis.
- Comparative effects of different magnetic stimulation modalities on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Comparative efficacy of different exercise modalities on renal function and glycemic control in patients with non-dialysis diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Comparative efficacy of digital health intervention delivery modalities on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of different exercise modalities on frailty in older adults
BibTeX
@article{li2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative effects of different exercise training modalities on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.}},
author = {Yaozong Li and Jian Wang and Shujuan Zhang and Fan Wu and Wei Zhang},
journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1953668},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923358},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative effects of different exercise training modalities on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
AU - Yaozong Li
AU - Jian Wang
AU - Shujuan Zhang
AU - Fan Wu
AU - Wei Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
JO - Frontiers in medicine
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1953668
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923358
AB - Introduction Exercise training is central to pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease (ILD), but the comparative effects of different exercise modalities remain uncertain. We compared their effects on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and health-related quality of life.Methods Six databases were searched from inception to June 11, 2026. Randomized controlled trials of exercise training in adults with ILD were included. Interventions were classified as aerobic training (AER), aerobic plus resistance training (AER_RES), respiratory-focused training comprising breathing exercises or inspiratory muscle training (BREATH_IMT), aerobic plus resistance plus breathing training (AER_RES_BREATH), mind-body exercise (MIND_BODY), or control (CON). Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses evaluated changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), percentage predicted forced vital capacity (FVC% predicted), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RoB 2 and CINeMA were used to assess risk of bias and confidence in the evidence.Results Twenty-six trials involving 1,409 participants were included. Compared with CON, all active modalities improved 6MWD, with MDs ranging from 29.46 m for AER (95% CI 11.82-47.10) to 57.12 m for AER_RES_BREATH (95% CI 41.76-72.48). AER_RES_BREATH produced greater estimated improvements than AER (MD 27.67 m, 95% CI 4.25-51.08) and AER_RES (MD 25.18 m, 95% CI 6.69-43.68), although these comparisons relied mainly on indirect evidence. Only AER_RES_BREATH showed a small improvement in FVC% predicted versus CON (MD 3.08 percentage points, 95% CI 0.05-6.12), with limited robustness and low confidence. AER_RES, AER_RES_BREATH, and MIND_BODY improved SGRQ total scores (MDs 10.08-15.20 points). Findings for 6MWD were the most robust across sensitivity analyses.Discussion Exercise training improves functional exercise capacity and may improve health-related quality of life in adults with ILD. AER_RES_BREATH showed the strongest signal for 6MWD, but limited direct comparisons preclude its designation as the optimal intervention. Evidence for FVC% predicted was less robust and should not be interpreted as evidence of disease modification.Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261399024, identifier PROSPERO CRD420261399024.
SN - 2296-858X
ER -