Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

Unlocking agroforestry transitions

Abstract

Despite decades of evidence demonstrating the environmental and socio-economic benefits of agroforestry, transitions toward tree-based farming systems remain limited across most agricultural landscapes. Existing research has largely focused on farmer-level adoption barriers, including delayed economic returns, policy constraints, land-tenure insecurity, and knowledge gaps. While important, these explanations provide only a partial understanding of why agroforestry remains difficult to scale. This commentary argues that agroforestry should be understood as an agricultural sustainability transition involving the reconfiguration of socio-ecological, institutional, and economic systems rather than the adoption of isolated farming practices. We contend that the central challenge is not simply the diffusion of agroforestry technologies, but the limited capacity of prevailing agricultural innovation systems to manage the long-term ecological dynamics, institutional complexity, and economic uncertainties associated with tree-based systems. Drawing on sustainability-transition theory, innovation systems research, and adaptive governance, we examine how long-term research and development (R&D) partnerships can support agroforestry transitions by fostering social learning, strengthening adaptive capacity, coordinating stakeholders' actions, and linking local experimentation to broader institutional and policy change. Evidence from collaborative initiatives in Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America illustrates how multi-actor partnerships can create the conditions necessary for scaling agroforestry beyond localized pilot projects. By advancing a transition-oriented perspective, this commentary highlights the strategic importance of systemic innovation partnerships for enabling resilient, equitable, and sustainable agricultural futures.

Related

  1. Evidence of macroclimatic impacts of deploying agroforestry at landscape scale
    Sylvain Dupont, Nina Mengual, Marc Saudreau +1
    Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyPeer-reviewedCC BY1 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Contribution of aboveground and belowground biomass of Robinia pseudoacacia trees to total plant carbon stocks in a young agroforestry system
    Soline Martin-Blangy, Christophe Jourdan, Isabelle Bertrand +5
    Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyAtmospheric science & meteorologyHAL
  3. Ground beetles in agroforestry system show functional traits and activity-density differences according to distance to trees
    Florian Kletty, Pascal Deville, Cédric Devigne +3
    Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-SA 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Threats to the environmental integrity of voluntary carbon markets: A case of reversal risks in the climate-smart agroforestry carbon trading project in Northern Uganda
    Vincent Canwat, Daniel Mukisa
    Nature-Based SolutionsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  5. Hydrogen Digital Product Passport: Unlocking Trust and Transparency for a Global Low-Carbon Future.
    David Parra, Lourdes F Vega, Magdy M Hassan +2
    Environmental science & technologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{rival2026unlocking,
  title = {{Unlocking agroforestry transitions}},
  author = {Alain Rival and Philippe Guizol and Denis Fabre},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1080/14735903.2026.2721725},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05774785v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Unlocking agroforestry transitions
AU  - Alain Rival
AU  - Philippe Guizol
AU  - Denis Fabre
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
DO  - 10.1080/14735903.2026.2721725
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05774785v1
AB  - Despite decades of evidence demonstrating the environmental and socio-economic benefits of agroforestry, transitions toward tree-based farming systems remain limited across most agricultural landscapes. Existing research has largely focused on farmer-level adoption barriers, including delayed economic returns, policy constraints, land-tenure insecurity, and knowledge gaps. While important, these explanations provide only a partial understanding of why agroforestry remains difficult to scale. This commentary argues that agroforestry should be understood as an agricultural sustainability transition involving the reconfiguration of socio-ecological, institutional, and economic systems rather than the adoption of isolated farming practices. We contend that the central challenge is not simply the diffusion of agroforestry technologies, but the limited capacity of prevailing agricultural innovation systems to manage the long-term ecological dynamics, institutional complexity, and economic uncertainties associated with tree-based systems. Drawing on sustainability-transition theory, innovation systems research, and adaptive governance, we examine how long-term research and development (R&D) partnerships can support agroforestry transitions by fostering social learning, strengthening adaptive capacity, coordinating stakeholders' actions, and linking local experimentation to broader institutional and policy change. Evidence from collaborative initiatives in Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America illustrates how multi-actor partnerships can create the conditions necessary for scaling agroforestry beyond localized pilot projects. By advancing a transition-oriented perspective, this commentary highlights the strategic importance of systemic innovation partnerships for enabling resilient, equitable, and sustainable agricultural futures.
SN  - 1473-5903
ER  -