Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Oral Health

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes of Nursing Staff towards Oral Healthcare for Care-Dependent Older Adults (ANOCO) scale

  1. 1School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035 People’s Republic of China
  2. 2School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006 People’s Republic of China
  3. 3School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 321121 People’s Republic of China

Abstract

Objectives: To translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Chinese version of the Attitudes of Nursing Staff towards Oral Healthcare for Care-Dependent Older Adults (ANOCO) questionnaire.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used for this study. Guided by the Brislin translation model, we produced the Chinese ANOCO and enriched its content through qualitative interviews. Cross-cultural adaptation and item refinement were completed via expert consultation (n = 14) and cognitive testing with 30 nursing staff. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 240 registered nurses from 12 tertiary hospitals across six regions and 318 undergraduate nursing interns from three universities. Psychometric testing included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman–Brown split-half reliability, and intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: The finalized questionnaire contains 22 items organized into four dimensions. Item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.938 to 1.000, while the scale-level index reached 0.922. EFA extracted four factors explaining 73.261% of the total variance, and CFA demonstrated strong structural validity with good model fit. Reliability analyses yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.947, split-half reliability.

Conclusions: The Chinese ANOCO is a reliable, valid, and clinically applicable tool for assessing nursing attitudes toward oral care for older adults, offering guidance for managerial decision-making, intervention planning, and educational evaluation.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09501-1.

Related

  1. Development and psychometric validation of a tool to assess healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices in pediatric injury rehabilitation in Northern Tanzania
    Baraka Moshi, Baraka Moshi, Baraka Moshi +14
    Frontiers in Rehabilitation SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Factor structure and psychometric validation of the antenatal exercise knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire : A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from Saudi Arabian pregnant women
    Abdullah Hussain Alzahrani, Wael Alghamdi
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Adaptation of the mentor mindsets scale: validation, psychometric properties, and practical application
    Burhanettin Ozdemir, Dilek Ilhan-Beyaztas
    Frontiers in psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  4. Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian ObsQoR-10 in inpatient women 24 to 48 h after vaginal or elective cesarean delivery
    Mahsa Maghalian, Sahar Rouhzendeh, Mojgan Mirghafourvand
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCrossref
  5. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Digital and Technological Self-Efficacy Scale among nursing students: a three-phase validation study.
    Wenna Wang, Jiaying Feng, Zhiguang Ping +2
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{cheng2026crosscultural,
  title = {{Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes of Nursing Staff towards Oral Healthcare for Care-Dependent Older Adults (ANOCO) scale}},
  author = {Linan Cheng and Xuancheng Chen},
  journal = {BMC Oral Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12903-026-09501-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09501-1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes of Nursing Staff towards Oral Healthcare for Care-Dependent Older Adults (ANOCO) scale
AU  - Linan Cheng
AU  - Xuancheng Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - BMC Oral Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12903-026-09501-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09501-1
AB  - Objectives: To translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Chinese version of the Attitudes of Nursing Staff towards Oral Healthcare for Care-Dependent Older Adults (ANOCO) questionnaire.  Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used for this study. Guided by the Brislin translation model, we produced the Chinese ANOCO and enriched its content through qualitative interviews. Cross-cultural adaptation and item refinement were completed via expert consultation (n = 14) and cognitive testing with 30 nursing staff. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 240 registered nurses from 12 tertiary hospitals across six regions and 318 undergraduate nursing interns from three universities. Psychometric testing included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman–Brown split-half reliability, and intraclass correlation coefficients.  Results: The finalized questionnaire contains 22 items organized into four dimensions. Item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.938 to 1.000, while the scale-level index reached 0.922. EFA extracted four factors explaining 73.261% of the total variance, and CFA demonstrated strong structural validity with good model fit. Reliability analyses yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.947, split-half reliability.  Conclusions: The Chinese ANOCO is a reliable, valid, and clinically applicable tool for assessing nursing attitudes toward oral care for older adults, offering guidance for managerial decision-making, intervention planning, and educational evaluation.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09501-1.
SN  - 1472-6831
ER  -