The Effect of More than 50% Resection of the Inferior Articular Process on Spinal Stability in Unilateral Single-Segment Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective This study was conducted to observe whether patients with more than 50% resection of the inferior articular process (IAP) develop spinal instability. Methods Patients who underwent unilateral single-segment Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (IELD) were reviewed from March 2017 to March 2023 at the authors’ institution. Patients with more than 50% resection of the IAP were included. All patients were divided into 2 groups:group T (total resection of IAP), group P (partial resection of IAP). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was used to evaluate low back pain. The following radiographic parameters were measured: (1) slip and disc arc on standing lateral flexion/extension radiographs; (2) intervertebral space height (ISH); and (3) length, width, and thickness of the IAP. (4) width of superior articular process (SAP). The volume of the IAP was estimated by multiplying its height, width and thickness. Patients with Δ slip ≥3 mm or Δ arc ≥15° were classified as having segmental instability. All the parameters were compared with their former values. Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the associations among Δslip, Δarc, ODI, changes in ISH, and other metrics. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of recovery rate after IAP resection. The demographic characteristics of the patients, surgical data, radiographic measurements, and ODI were also compared between the 2 groups. Results Fifty-one patients were included in the study, and the resection rate of the IAP was 82.01% (62.20%, 93.04%). There was no significant difference in the dynamic arc or slip between preoperative and follow-up ( P > 0.05). No case of segmental instability observed at follow-up. The volume of the IAP increased significantly at the final follow-up compared with that immediately after surgery (Z = −5.579, P < 0.001 ). The recovery rate of IAP was 88.66(22.03,113.91) % with an average time of 16(11,28) months. The follow-up ODI and ISH was 6.5(4.4,11.1) and 7.9(6.5,9.5) mm, respectively. Compared with those before the operation, ODI and ISH decreased significantly (Z = −6.216, P < 0.001; Z = −6.215, P < 0.001 ). After adjusting for confounding factors, IAP resection rate (β = −0.583, B = −1.821, P < 0.001) and follow-up duration (β = 0.502, B = 0.017, P < 0.001) were the strongest independent predictors of recovery rate, followed by age (β = 0.200, B = 0.010, P = 0.036). No significant independent associations were observed for sex or BMI with IAP recovery rate. At the final follow-up, the volume of the IAP showed no increase in group T, with a significant difference compared with group P (Z = −4.882, P < 0.001 ). The postoperative ODI score was higher in group T (Z = −2.799, P = 0.005 ), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at the final follow-up. Conclusion In the cohort of this study, patients with >50% IAP resection did not develop radiographic instability, and some showed bone regeneration, though those with complete resection did not regenerate.
Related
- Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Comparative Study With Quantitative MRI-Based Decompression Analysis.
- Comparison Between Interlaminar and Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Sciatic Scoliosis Secondary to Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum 1 Year Follow‐Up
- Association of preoperative Pfirrmann grade with 12-month outcomes after interlaminar full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy with successful annular suture repair: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
- Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy (PFEILD): A Retrospective Single-Surgeon Pilot Cohort Study.
- Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using a Finite Element Model.
BibTeX
@article{li2026effect,
title = {{The Effect of More than 50% Resection of the Inferior Articular Process on Spinal Stability in Unilateral Single-Segment Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy}},
author = {Tao Li MM and Tao Gao MM and Chao Wu MM and Sheng-yu Wan MM and Xiang-yu Wang MM and Jian-dong Tang MM and Hai-gang Hu MM},
journal = {Global Spine Journal},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1177/21925682261446557},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261446557},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The Effect of More than 50% Resection of the Inferior Articular Process on Spinal Stability in Unilateral Single-Segment Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
AU - Tao Li MM
AU - Tao Gao MM
AU - Chao Wu MM
AU - Sheng-yu Wan MM
AU - Xiang-yu Wang MM
AU - Jian-dong Tang MM
AU - Hai-gang Hu MM
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/31
JO - Global Spine Journal
DO - 10.1177/21925682261446557
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261446557
AB - Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective This study was conducted to observe whether patients with more than 50% resection of the inferior articular process (IAP) develop spinal instability. Methods Patients who underwent unilateral single-segment Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (IELD) were reviewed from March 2017 to March 2023 at the authors’ institution. Patients with more than 50% resection of the IAP were included. All patients were divided into 2 groups:group T (total resection of IAP), group P (partial resection of IAP). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was used to evaluate low back pain. The following radiographic parameters were measured: (1) slip and disc arc on standing lateral flexion/extension radiographs; (2) intervertebral space height (ISH); and (3) length, width, and thickness of the IAP. (4) width of superior articular process (SAP). The volume of the IAP was estimated by multiplying its height, width and thickness. Patients with Δ slip ≥3 mm or Δ arc ≥15° were classified as having segmental instability. All the parameters were compared with their former values. Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the associations among Δslip, Δarc, ODI, changes in ISH, and other metrics. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of recovery rate after IAP resection. The demographic characteristics of the patients, surgical data, radiographic measurements, and ODI were also compared between the 2 groups. Results Fifty-one patients were included in the study, and the resection rate of the IAP was 82.01% (62.20%, 93.04%). There was no significant difference in the dynamic arc or slip between preoperative and follow-up ( P > 0.05). No case of segmental instability observed at follow-up. The volume of the IAP increased significantly at the final follow-up compared with that immediately after surgery (Z = −5.579, P < 0.001 ). The recovery rate of IAP was 88.66(22.03,113.91) % with an average time of 16(11,28) months. The follow-up ODI and ISH was 6.5(4.4,11.1) and 7.9(6.5,9.5) mm, respectively. Compared with those before the operation, ODI and ISH decreased significantly (Z = −6.216, P < 0.001; Z = −6.215, P < 0.001 ). After adjusting for confounding factors, IAP resection rate (β = −0.583, B = −1.821, P < 0.001) and follow-up duration (β = 0.502, B = 0.017, P < 0.001) were the strongest independent predictors of recovery rate, followed by age (β = 0.200, B = 0.010, P = 0.036). No significant independent associations were observed for sex or BMI with IAP recovery rate. At the final follow-up, the volume of the IAP showed no increase in group T, with a significant difference compared with group P (Z = −4.882, P < 0.001 ). The postoperative ODI score was higher in group T (Z = −2.799, P = 0.005 ), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at the final follow-up. Conclusion In the cohort of this study, patients with >50% IAP resection did not develop radiographic instability, and some showed bone regeneration, though those with complete resection did not regenerate.
SN - 2192-5682
SN - 2192-5690
ER -