Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Modelling assessment of the different paths of between-farm transmission of avian influenza HPAI in Northern Italy in 2021--2022

  1. 1University of Trento

Abstract

We propose a stochastic epidemic model to describe the spread of avian influenza in a network of poultry farms. We consider three main paths of infection transmission between poultry farms: from nearby farms, mainly through airborne diffusion; from farms belonging to the same company, through shared veterinarians, forage providers and similar; from undetected small farms or wildlife. From the parameter estimation, based on a modified Expectation-Maximization algorithm, we infer that approximately 63% of the farms were infected from nearby ones, with an infection force declining with distance; of these, more than one third belonged to the same company of the estimated infector. About 20% were infected from premises belonging to the same company but farther away than the distance threshold of 2 km; the remaining ones from wildlife or unidentified sources. These estimates have been validated by a comparison with genetic data, available for a subset of the farms: the genetic distance between two farms identified, with high probability, as an infector-infectee pair is much lower than between random pairs. These results may help in the implementation of tailored prevention and control measures for future outbreaks.

Related

  1. Risk assessment of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 viruses into French broiler and layer farms from other poultry sectors
    Claire Hautefeuille, Facundo Munoz, Gwenaelle Dauphin +2
    Preventive Veterinary MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDZoology & animal behaviourHAL
  2. Traction machine-induced soil compaction: A review of stress transmission, mitigation, and predictive modelling
    Hamza Mohieddinne, Carolina Ugarte
    Journal of TerramechanicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyHAL
  3. InfluProto: Predicting Cross-Species Transmission of Influenza A Virus via Prototype Learning
    Z. Geng, L. Li, R. Ye +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  4. A modelling challenge to improve preparedness for highly pathogenicavian influenza epidemics: objectives, design and synthetic datageneration
    B. H. Hayes, G. Beaunee, S. Lambert +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. Modelling pasture-based beef production costs using panel data from farms with different soil quality
    Andreas Tsakiridis, Kevin Hanrahan, James Breen +2
    Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental StudiesPeer-reviewedHAL deposit licenceFull text2 citedGeneral biologyHAL
BibTeX
@misc{sensi2026modelling,
  title = {{Modelling assessment of the different paths of between-farm transmission of avian influenza HPAI in Northern Italy in 2021--2022}},
  author = {M. Sensi and S. Sottile and D. Fornasiero and I. Monne and P. Mulatti and A. Pugliese},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.19.752832},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.19.752832v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Modelling assessment of the different paths of between-farm transmission of avian influenza HPAI in Northern Italy in 2021--2022
AU  - M. Sensi
AU  - S. Sottile
AU  - D. Fornasiero
AU  - I. Monne
AU  - P. Mulatti
AU  - A. Pugliese
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/19
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.19.752832
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.19.752832v1
AB  - We propose a stochastic epidemic model to describe the spread of avian influenza in a network of poultry farms. We consider three main paths of infection transmission between poultry farms: from nearby farms, mainly through airborne diffusion; from farms belonging to the same company, through shared veterinarians, forage providers and similar; from undetected small farms or wildlife. From the parameter estimation, based on a modified Expectation-Maximization algorithm, we infer that approximately 63% of the farms were infected from nearby ones, with an infection force declining with distance; of these, more than one third belonged to the same company of the estimated infector. About 20% were infected from premises belonging to the same company but farther away than the distance threshold of 2 km; the remaining ones from wildlife or unidentified sources. These estimates have been validated by a comparison with genetic data, available for a subset of the farms: the genetic distance between two farms identified, with high probability, as an infector-infectee pair is much lower than between random pairs. These results may help in the implementation of tailored prevention and control measures for future outbreaks.
ER  -