Impulsivity during adolescent development: Insights from a decade of ABCD study longitudinal analyses.
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- 2Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- 3Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- 4Brown University Library, Providence, RI, USA.
- 5Department of Family Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 6Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
Background
The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study provides an unprecedented opportunity to examine how impulsivity develops and predicts health outcomes. This review synthesized longitudinal findings from the study's first decade and identified priories for future research.Methods
Following Cochrane's guidelines, we systematically searched for peer-reviewed papers published through July 2025. Eligible studies included self-reported or task-based measures of impulsivity and used two or more data waves. Fifty-one studies met inclusion criteria.Results
Impulsivity was predominantly operationalized using self-report trait measures, particularly the UPPS-P or urgency-specific measures (k = 42) and BIS/BAS scales (k = 23); task-based measures used less often (k = 20). Across health domains, urgency, sensation seeking, and lack of premeditation (impulse control) showed recurring prospective associations, although findings varied across outcomes and studies. Findings involving task-based measures also varied across studies. Several studies examined impulsivity as an outcome of environmental exposures, supporting its developmental malleability, but few explicitly modeled changes in impulsivity over time. Few eligible studies examined neuroimaging measures, precluding firm conclusions about the magnitude or consistency of their associations.Conclusions
Findings from ABCD extend prior impulsivity research by demonstrating that multiple self-reported impulsivity facets are early-emerging prospective correlates of health risk in a large preadolescent cohort. Divergence between self-report and task-based findings may reflect the multi-dimensionality of impulsivity and related constructs and highlights the need for standardized scoring across ABCD studies. The most important gap is the underutilization of ABCD's longitudinal design to model trajectories of impulsivity itself. As additional waves become available, the field is well-positioned to move from establishing associations to characterizing developmental trajectories, mechanisms, and modifiable influences.
Related
- Longitudinal patterns of digital parenting restrictions and adolescent screen use: Insights from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study
- Brain Age Gap Associations with Externalising Behaviours in Youth: A Longitudinal Investigation in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Cohort
- Longitudinal fMRI reveals altered developmental trajectories of functional network organisation associated with adolescent cannabis use
- Mapping sex-specific hormone-metabolite coupling in the adolescent brain: a longitudinal whole-brain spectroscopic imaging study
- Case Report: Severe periodontitis in adolescent monozygotic twins with ELANE-related neutropenia: a 42-month longitudinal observation
BibTeX
@article{gebru2026impulsivity,
title = {{Impulsivity during adolescent development: Insights from a decade of ABCD study longitudinal analyses.}},
author = {Nioud Mulugeta Gebru and Priscila Dib Gonçalves and Faith Adams and Nicita Anand and Laura N Haygood and Micah E Johnson and Alexandra O Cohen},
journal = {Developmental cognitive neuroscience},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101832},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42880158},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Impulsivity during adolescent development: Insights from a decade of ABCD study longitudinal analyses.
AU - Nioud Mulugeta Gebru
AU - Priscila Dib Gonçalves
AU - Faith Adams
AU - Nicita Anand
AU - Laura N Haygood
AU - Micah E Johnson
AU - Alexandra O Cohen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Developmental cognitive neuroscience
DO - 10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101832
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42880158
AB - Background The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study provides an unprecedented opportunity to examine how impulsivity develops and predicts health outcomes. This review synthesized longitudinal findings from the study's first decade and identified priories for future research.Methods Following Cochrane's guidelines, we systematically searched for peer-reviewed papers published through July 2025. Eligible studies included self-reported or task-based measures of impulsivity and used two or more data waves. Fifty-one studies met inclusion criteria.Results Impulsivity was predominantly operationalized using self-report trait measures, particularly the UPPS-P or urgency-specific measures (k = 42) and BIS/BAS scales (k = 23); task-based measures used less often (k = 20). Across health domains, urgency, sensation seeking, and lack of premeditation (impulse control) showed recurring prospective associations, although findings varied across outcomes and studies. Findings involving task-based measures also varied across studies. Several studies examined impulsivity as an outcome of environmental exposures, supporting its developmental malleability, but few explicitly modeled changes in impulsivity over time. Few eligible studies examined neuroimaging measures, precluding firm conclusions about the magnitude or consistency of their associations.Conclusions Findings from ABCD extend prior impulsivity research by demonstrating that multiple self-reported impulsivity facets are early-emerging prospective correlates of health risk in a large preadolescent cohort. Divergence between self-report and task-based findings may reflect the multi-dimensionality of impulsivity and related constructs and highlights the need for standardized scoring across ABCD studies. The most important gap is the underutilization of ABCD's longitudinal design to model trajectories of impulsivity itself. As additional waves become available, the field is well-positioned to move from establishing associations to characterizing developmental trajectories, mechanisms, and modifiable influences.
SN - 1878-9293
SN - 1878-9307
ER -