Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Spatio-Temporal Stochastic Interventions for Causal Inference in Climate Science

Abstract

Estimating causal effects in climate science, such as the effect of anthropogenic warming on crop loss, is challenging because of complex spatio-temporal dependence and the high-dimensional nature of the treatment. To address this dependence and the resulting poor overlap between observed and counterfactual scenarios, we develop a spatio-temporal stochastic-intervention framework for estimating causal effects from climate observations. We introduce a regularized estimator of the stochastic-intervention treatment effect that trades a controlled bias for a reduction in the weight variance caused by poor overlap. Simulation studies show that this estimator attains lower mean squared error than alternative weighting estimators and removes the confounding bias of an unadjusted estimator. We apply the framework to estimate the effect of historical warming on vapor-pressure deficit, a driver of crop stress, adjusting for precipitation, which confounds the effect by affecting both temperature and humidity. In GISS-E2-1-G climate-model simulations, the global effect is distinguishable from zero in every year from 1995 onward, and omitting the precipitation adjustment inflates the global estimate by 47%. Adjustment reverses the sign of the estimate over 8% of global cropland (125 million hectares), where an unadjusted analysis could misdirect adaptation between heat-focused and moisture-focused measures.

Related

  1. Stochastic Optimization and Data Science
    Arutyun Avetisyan, Darina Dvinskikh, Alexander Gasnikov +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Nonparametric Regression on the Circle with Applications to Climate and Environmental Science
    Athanasios G. Georgiadis, Andrew P. Percival
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Oceans of Data: Teaching Climate Change through Data Science
    Pierre Tandeo, Sally Close, Guillaume Maze +1
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  4. Statistical Inference for Causal Discovery under Selection and Latent Variables via Single-Target Interventions
    Xiaotian Hou, Kwangmoon Park, Hongzhe Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Optimizing Geoengineering Interventions Using Differentiable Climate Models
    Pulkit Dubey, Dorian S. Abbot, Ashesh Chattopadhyay
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{baugh2026spatiotemporal,
  title = {{Spatio-Temporal Stochastic Interventions for Causal Inference in Climate Science}},
  author = {Samuel Baugh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.05827},
  eprint = {2610.05827},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05827},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Spatio-Temporal Stochastic Interventions for Causal Inference in Climate Science
AU  - Samuel Baugh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.05827
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05827
AB  - Estimating causal effects in climate science, such as the effect of anthropogenic warming on crop loss, is challenging because of complex spatio-temporal dependence and the high-dimensional nature of the treatment. To address this dependence and the resulting poor overlap between observed and counterfactual scenarios, we develop a spatio-temporal stochastic-intervention framework for estimating causal effects from climate observations. We introduce a regularized estimator of the stochastic-intervention treatment effect that trades a controlled bias for a reduction in the weight variance caused by poor overlap. Simulation studies show that this estimator attains lower mean squared error than alternative weighting estimators and removes the confounding bias of an unadjusted estimator. We apply the framework to estimate the effect of historical warming on vapor-pressure deficit, a driver of crop stress, adjusting for precipitation, which confounds the effect by affecting both temperature and humidity. In GISS-E2-1-G climate-model simulations, the global effect is distinguishable from zero in every year from 1995 onward, and omitting the precipitation adjustment inflates the global estimate by 47%. Adjustment reverses the sign of the estimate over 8% of global cropland (125 million hectares), where an unadjusted analysis could misdirect adaptation between heat-focused and moisture-focused measures.
ER  -