Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Weight-Loss Magnitude, Fat Mass, and Device-Estimated Muscle Mass Loss During Obesity Pharmacotherapy

5 affiliations
  1. 1Doctoral School of Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
  2. 2Centre for Molecular Research in Nephrology and Vascular Disease, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
  3. 3Second Department of Internal Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
  4. 4First Department of Internal Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
  5. 5Multidisciplinary Research Center for Malignant Hematological Diseases (CCMHM), “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania

Abstract

Background: Body-composition changes during routine obesity pharmacotherapy require cautious interpretation. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort included 59 adults with paired InBody 770 assessments: 53 receiving tirzepatide and 6 receiving semaglutide. Paired changes and relative device-estimated muscle mass loss were analyzed in all 59; component-share analyses were restricted to the 51 achieving ≥5% weight loss. Analyses used rank-based methods and exploratory robust regression. Results: Recorded treatment duration was a median of 7.0 months, and median observed weight loss was 12.11%. Median fat mass and device-estimated muscle mass losses were 9.9 and 2.3 kg, respectively. Among the 51 participants achieving ≥5% weight loss, median fat, device-estimated muscle, and residual shares were 73.95%, 14.91%, and 10.85%. Each additional five percentage points of weight loss was associated with 2.47 percentage points greater relative device-estimated muscle mass loss (95% CI, 1.89 to 3.05). The corresponding fully adjusted association with muscle share was −0.52 percentage points (95% CI, −1.66 to 0.62); this does not establish stability or equivalence. Final drug-specific dose intensity was not statistically associated with either outcome in the adjusted models. Conclusions: Weight loss observed in this selected, predominantly tirzepatide-treated cohort was mainly accounted for by estimated fat mass reduction. Larger observed weight-loss responses accompanied greater device-estimated muscle mass reductions. Muscle-share estimates were uncertain and model-dependent. The study cannot establish causal medication effects or functional consequences.

Related

  1. Continuous glucose monitoring after discontinuation of incretin-based obesity pharmacotherapy: indirect evidence and a research framework for metabolic stability and weight maintenance
    Andrijana Koceva, Andrej Janez, Mojca Jensterle
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  2. Do Gastric Balloons Have a Future? Intragastric Balloons in the Era of Highly Effective Obesity Pharmacotherapy.
    Rhea Sibal, G Balamurugan, Mohammed Aradaib +2
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Precision Pharmacotherapy for Childhood Obesity: Molecular Targets Beyond Single GLP-1 Receptor Agonism and a Framework for Disease Modification
    Hajar Dauleh, Khalid Hussain
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Molecularly guided pharmacotherapy for obesity: emerging targets, clinical efficacy, and personalized therapeutic approaches
    Jianchao Mao, Rong Hu
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  5. Diabesity: an old term, a modern challenge — multi-omics and precision anti-obesity pharmacotherapy in type 2 diabetes
    Karolina Hoffmann, Weronika Faustyna Pucek, Wiktoria Skrzypek +16
    Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiquesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{tomescu2026weightloss,
  title = {{Weight-Loss Magnitude, Fat Mass, and Device-Estimated Muscle Mass Loss During Obesity Pharmacotherapy}},
  author = {Cristina Tomescu and Alin Albai and Vlad Florian Avram and Sandra Timar and Anamaria Cipu and Bogdan Timar},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15208008},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8008},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Weight-Loss Magnitude, Fat Mass, and Device-Estimated Muscle Mass Loss During Obesity Pharmacotherapy
AU  - Cristina Tomescu
AU  - Alin Albai
AU  - Vlad Florian Avram
AU  - Sandra Timar
AU  - Anamaria Cipu
AU  - Bogdan Timar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15208008
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8008
AB  - Background: Body-composition changes during routine obesity pharmacotherapy require cautious interpretation. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort included 59 adults with paired InBody 770 assessments: 53 receiving tirzepatide and 6 receiving semaglutide. Paired changes and relative device-estimated muscle mass loss were analyzed in all 59; component-share analyses were restricted to the 51 achieving ≥5% weight loss. Analyses used rank-based methods and exploratory robust regression. Results: Recorded treatment duration was a median of 7.0 months, and median observed weight loss was 12.11%. Median fat mass and device-estimated muscle mass losses were 9.9 and 2.3 kg, respectively. Among the 51 participants achieving ≥5% weight loss, median fat, device-estimated muscle, and residual shares were 73.95%, 14.91%, and 10.85%. Each additional five percentage points of weight loss was associated with 2.47 percentage points greater relative device-estimated muscle mass loss (95% CI, 1.89 to 3.05). The corresponding fully adjusted association with muscle share was −0.52 percentage points (95% CI, −1.66 to 0.62); this does not establish stability or equivalence. Final drug-specific dose intensity was not statistically associated with either outcome in the adjusted models. Conclusions: Weight loss observed in this selected, predominantly tirzepatide-treated cohort was mainly accounted for by estimated fat mass reduction. Larger observed weight-loss responses accompanied greater device-estimated muscle mass reductions. Muscle-share estimates were uncertain and model-dependent. The study cannot establish causal medication effects or functional consequences.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -