Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Validating Timing-Model Accuracy for Continuous Gravitational Waves: A Comparison of LALSuite and PINT

Abstract

We present results of a systematic validation of the \lalsuite{} timing model for continuous gravitational waves against \pint{}, a modern high-accuracy pulsar-timing package. An accurate timing model is essential for tracking the signal phase, and hence for detecting and accurately characterizing continuous gravitational waves. In order to quantify the impact of timing inaccuracies, we derive and validate the leading-order relation μ≈ (2πf)2stddtau2, where μ is the fractional loss of signal power, f is the signal frequency, and stddtau2 is the variance of the timing errors. We then compare the solar-system and binary components of the \lalsuite{} timing model against the corresponding models in \pint{}. With the original \lalsuite{} Einstein-delay implementation, the total disagreement is dominated by that component and has stddtau≃SI2.3microsecond (corresponding to μ≃SI0.02percent at f=SI1000hertz). With the newer Einstein-delay implementation, the total disagreement (over one year) drops to stddtau≲SI31nanosecond (or μ≲num4e−8 at f=SI1000hertz) and is dominated by the observatory contribution to the \Romer{} delay, owing to the approximate Earth-rotation model used by \lalsuite{}. We additionally test binary delays using orbital parameters from \num{474} catalogued binary pulsars and verify the self-consistency of the \lalsuite{} source-time derivatives. Finally, we derive and discuss the \lalsuite{} Shapiro delay for signals passing through the solar interior, a case only relevant to gravitational waves.

Related

  1. Wide parameter-space O3 search for continuous gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars in binary systems
    P. B. Covas, M. A. Papa, R. Prix
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  2. Choosing a generator for streaming Gaussian noise in gravitational-wave mock data: accuracy, cost and reproducibility
    Isaac C. F. Wong
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsComputational physicsarXiv
  3. Pilot search for continuous gravitational waves from Hercules X-1 in O3 LIGO data: enhancements to a hidden Markov model
    Nicholas Kah Yean Low, Andrew Melatos
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Probing magnetic fields of compact objects with continuous gravitational waves
    Gopalkrishna Prabhu, Aditya Kumar Sharma, R. Prasad +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Alternative neural-network follow-up for all-sky FrequencyHough in continuous gravitational-wave searches
    Martina Di Cesare, Pia Astone, Rosario De Rosa +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{sharma2026validating,
  title = {{Validating Timing-Model Accuracy for Continuous Gravitational Waves: A Comparison of LALSuite and PINT}},
  author = {Kartikey Sharma and Reinhard Prix and Maria Alessandra Papa and Curt Cutler},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.26271},
  eprint = {2608.26271},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26271},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Validating Timing-Model Accuracy for Continuous Gravitational Waves: A Comparison of LALSuite and PINT
AU  - Kartikey Sharma
AU  - Reinhard Prix
AU  - Maria Alessandra Papa
AU  - Curt Cutler
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.26271
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26271
AB  - We present results of a systematic validation of the \lalsuite{} timing model for continuous gravitational waves against \pint{}, a modern high-accuracy pulsar-timing package. An accurate timing model is essential for tracking the signal phase, and hence for detecting and accurately characterizing continuous gravitational waves. In order to quantify the impact of timing inaccuracies, we derive and validate the leading-order relation μ≈ (2πf)^2stddtau^2, where μ is the fractional loss of signal power, f is the signal frequency, and stddtau^2 is the variance of the timing errors. We then compare the solar-system and binary components of the \lalsuite{} timing model against the corresponding models in \pint{}. With the original \lalsuite{} Einstein-delay implementation, the total disagreement is dominated by that component and has stddtau≃SI2.3microsecond (corresponding to μ≃SI0.02percent at f=SI1000hertz). With the newer Einstein-delay implementation, the total disagreement (over one year) drops to stddtau≲SI31nanosecond (or μ≲num4e−8 at f=SI1000hertz) and is dominated by the observatory contribution to the \Romer{} delay, owing to the approximate Earth-rotation model used by \lalsuite{}. We additionally test binary delays using orbital parameters from \num{474} catalogued binary pulsars and verify the self-consistency of the \lalsuite{} source-time derivatives. Finally, we derive and discuss the \lalsuite{} Shapiro delay for signals passing through the solar interior, a case only relevant to gravitational waves.
ER  -