Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Minimal Projective Measurement Settings for Estimating Multiple Observables

Abstract

We study the minimum number of orthogonal projective measurement settings needed to estimate multiple observables without bias for arbitrary input states. We derive structural bounds that go beyond dimension counting and combine them with explicit constructions to certify minimum setting counts for selected target spaces. A classical variational algorithm searches for shared measurement bases and optimizes their readout coefficients and sample allocation. For the collective first and second moments of two qubits, we certify that four projective settings are necessary and sufficient. For this task, a numerically optimized four-setting design achieves a Haar-averaged variance within approximately 0.0341% of a lower bound valid for any number of projective settings in our fixed-allocation, unbiased linear estimation model. Numerical examples show that shared measurements can improve precision relative to the comparison protocols. For finite-depth circuits, we account for reconstruction bias and identify finite-sample regimes in which this advantage persists.

Related

  1. Benchmarking a randomized quantum algorithm for estimating expectation values of molecular observables
    Anna Schroeder, Gian-Luca R. Anselmetti, Matthias Degroote +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Induced Bell-CHSH observables in the Fewster-Verch measurement scheme
    M. S. Guimaraes, I. Roditi, S. P. Sorella
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Estimating redshift distributions of Fermi blazars with multiple machine-learning models
    Zhu Kerui, Chen Jiaming, Zheng Yonggang +4
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsCrossrefDOAJ
  4. Efficient measurement schemes for the Monte Carlo projective quantum eigensolver
    Divye Baid, Maria-Andreea Filip
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. First double-differential measurement of pionless charged-current muon neutrino interactions using kinematic imbalance observables on carbon and oxygen with the T2K experiment
    K. Abe, S. Abe, H. Adhikary +403
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{huang2026minimal,
  title = {{Minimal Projective Measurement Settings for Estimating Multiple Observables}},
  author = {Yibin Huang and Muchun Yang and D. L. Zhou},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.36525},
  eprint = {2610.36525},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36525},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Minimal Projective Measurement Settings for Estimating Multiple Observables
AU  - Yibin Huang
AU  - Muchun Yang
AU  - D. L. Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.36525
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36525
AB  - We study the minimum number of orthogonal projective measurement settings needed to estimate multiple observables without bias for arbitrary input states. We derive structural bounds that go beyond dimension counting and combine them with explicit constructions to certify minimum setting counts for selected target spaces. A classical variational algorithm searches for shared measurement bases and optimizes their readout coefficients and sample allocation. For the collective first and second moments of two qubits, we certify that four projective settings are necessary and sufficient. For this task, a numerically optimized four-setting design achieves a Haar-averaged variance within approximately 0.0341% of a lower bound valid for any number of projective settings in our fixed-allocation, unbiased linear estimation model. Numerical examples show that shared measurements can improve precision relative to the comparison protocols. For finite-depth circuits, we account for reconstruction bias and identify finite-sample regimes in which this advantage persists.
ER  -