Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

From Projected Subspaces to Full-Space Implementations: Representation-Equivalence Audits for Open-Shell ADAPT-VQE

Abstract

A variational state optimized in a symmetry-projected space need not be the state prepared by exponentiating the corresponding unprojected parent generators. For an orthogonal target-space projector P, Q=I−P, and an anti-Hermitian generator A, exact equivalence for all amplitudes requires target-space invariance, QAP=0. We formulate this condition as a representation-equivalence audit for open-shell ADAPT-VQE. For a canonical CAS(15e,9o) type-1 Cu(II) Hamiltonian, 274 of 323 bare Hartree--Fock-origin single, double, and triple excitations violate this condition. Projected-doublet ADAPT reaches 1.5719 mEh with 121 operators, whereas the same amplitudes in the corresponding full-space sequence give 464.730 mEh error, 0.07343 fidelity with the projected state, and 54.45\% quartet weight. Reoptimizing the same 121 parent generators in the same order under the hard constraint pD≥0.999 reduces the best converged error to 8.482 mEh, showing that the catastrophic same-angle failure is primarily a representation/parameter-transfer failure but is not completely repaired by full-space reoptimization of the fixed sequence. An independent 12-qubit NO benchmark exhibits the same mechanism more mildly. A spin-preserving generalized full-space construction removes the representation ambiguity and reaches 1.493 and 1.181 mEh at 18 and 24 qubits. For the 18-qubit positive control, selectively refining only four Suzuki-2 factors and re-transpiling with a fixed compiler seed passes the predeclared circuit-equivalence gate at 19,660 controlled-X (CX) gates and depth 23,016. Circuit synthesis and final-energy measurement therefore constitute separate validation layers. The contribution is a validation framework, not a new spin-adapted ADAPT algorithm.

Related

  1. Metadevices that compute: mathematical foundations and experimental implementations for neuromorphic nanophotonics
    Xian Hadia, Odysseas Tsilipakos, Dimitrios C. Tzarouchis +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptics & photonicsarXiv
  2. Vectorized Symmetric and Fermionic Tensor Network Implementations for GPU-Accelerated Variational Monte Carlo
    Si-Jing Du, Johnnie Gray, Ao Chen +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textComputational physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  3. ConQEC: Concolic Testing for Quantum Error-Correcting Code Implementations
    Zihao Li, Ji Guan, Mingsheng Ying
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks: Theory, Implementations, and Applications
    Léo Monbroussou, Maniraman Periyasamy, Viacheslav Kuzmin +4
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
  5. Composable logical gate error in approximate quantum error correction: reexamining gate implementations in Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes
    Lukas Brenner, Beatriz Dias, Robert Koenig
    QuantumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{malickova2026from,
  title = {{From Projected Subspaces to Full-Space Implementations: Representation-Equivalence Audits for Open-Shell ADAPT-VQE}},
  author = {Lucia Malíčková and Petr Klenovský},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.36060},
  eprint = {2609.36060},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36060},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - From Projected Subspaces to Full-Space Implementations: Representation-Equivalence Audits for Open-Shell ADAPT-VQE
AU  - Lucia Malíčková
AU  - Petr Klenovský
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.36060
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36060
AB  - A variational state optimized in a symmetry-projected space need not be the state prepared by exponentiating the corresponding unprojected parent generators. For an orthogonal target-space projector P, Q=I−P, and an anti-Hermitian generator A, exact equivalence for all amplitudes requires target-space invariance, QAP=0. We formulate this condition as a representation-equivalence audit for open-shell ADAPT-VQE. For a canonical CAS(15e,9o) type-1 Cu(II) Hamiltonian, 274 of 323 bare Hartree--Fock-origin single, double, and triple excitations violate this condition. Projected-doublet ADAPT reaches 1.5719 mE_h with 121 operators, whereas the same amplitudes in the corresponding full-space sequence give 464.730 mE_h error, 0.07343 fidelity with the projected state, and 54.45\% quartet weight. Reoptimizing the same 121 parent generators in the same order under the hard constraint p_D≥0.999 reduces the best converged error to 8.482 mE_h, showing that the catastrophic same-angle failure is primarily a representation/parameter-transfer failure but is not completely repaired by full-space reoptimization of the fixed sequence. An independent 12-qubit NO benchmark exhibits the same mechanism more mildly. A spin-preserving generalized full-space construction removes the representation ambiguity and reaches 1.493 and 1.181 mE_h at 18 and 24 qubits. For the 18-qubit positive control, selectively refining only four Suzuki-2 factors and re-transpiling with a fixed compiler seed passes the predeclared circuit-equivalence gate at 19,660 controlled-X (CX) gates and depth 23,016. Circuit synthesis and final-energy measurement therefore constitute separate validation layers. The contribution is a validation framework, not a new spin-adapted ADAPT algorithm.
ER  -