Organizational Research Support and Initial IRB Submission Quality in Postgraduate Surgical Training: A Five-Year Cohort Study.
- 1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
- 2Division of Human Research Ethics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
Scholarly activity is a core component of postgraduate surgical training. Yet early research processes particularly Institutional Review Board (IRB) submissions can impose substantial procedural and administrative burdens. These barriers may hinder timely engagement in research, especially among trainees. To evaluate whether the organizational research support delivered by trained research assistants is associated with improved initial IRB submission quality and reduced revision burden in a surgical training environment. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted using 356 IRB submissions from the Department of Surgery at a tertiary academic center in Bangkok, Thailand (2019-2023). Submissions were classified as research assistant (RA)-supported or non-supported. The primary outcomes were (1) receiving revision comments and (2) the number of unique revision comments during the initial IRB review cycle. Comments were categorized into administrative, ethical, methodological, and scientific domains. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression were performed, adjusting for investigator level, IRB review type, and year of submission. RA support was used in 324 submissions (91.0%) and 32 (9.0%) proceeded without RA support. RA support was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving revision comments (76.9% vs 93.8%; adjusted OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.82) and fewer comments per submission (median 2 vs 3; adjusted IRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.64). Reductions were primarily observed in administrative domains (39.8% vs 76.7%, p<0.001), with no significant differences in methodological, ethical, or scientific comments. The time to final approval did not differ between the groups. Organizational research support was associated with improved procedural readiness of IRB submissions, with fewer administrative deficiencies and no change in scientific review outcomes. Effects on scholarly engagement were not assessed and require prospective evaluation.
Related
- A narrative review of the decade-long integration of professional postgraduate education with standardized residency training in China
- An evaluation of the impact of a comprehensive, competence-based postgraduate training programme for physiotherapists specialising in paediatrics.
- From Thoracotomy to Robotic Platforms in Thoracic Surgery: Technical Evolution, Simulation-Based Training, and Surgical Outcomes.
- Development and educational evaluation of patient-specific 3D-printed breast phantoms for oncoplastic surgical training.
- Are 3D-printed temporal bone models the future of otologic surgical training? A national multicentre validation study.
BibTeX
@article{phengsalae2026organizational,
title = {{Organizational Research Support and Initial IRB Submission Quality in Postgraduate Surgical Training: A Five-Year Cohort Study.}},
author = {Yada Phengsalae and Pattawia Choikrua and Warangkhana Putsri and Premsant Sangkum and Panuwat Lertsithichai and Chinnakhet Ketsuwan},
journal = {Advances in medical education and practice},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.2147/amep.s638668},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999597},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Organizational Research Support and Initial IRB Submission Quality in Postgraduate Surgical Training: A Five-Year Cohort Study.
AU - Yada Phengsalae
AU - Pattawia Choikrua
AU - Warangkhana Putsri
AU - Premsant Sangkum
AU - Panuwat Lertsithichai
AU - Chinnakhet Ketsuwan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Advances in medical education and practice
DO - 10.2147/amep.s638668
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999597
AB - Scholarly activity is a core component of postgraduate surgical training. Yet early research processes particularly Institutional Review Board (IRB) submissions can impose substantial procedural and administrative burdens. These barriers may hinder timely engagement in research, especially among trainees. To evaluate whether the organizational research support delivered by trained research assistants is associated with improved initial IRB submission quality and reduced revision burden in a surgical training environment. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted using 356 IRB submissions from the Department of Surgery at a tertiary academic center in Bangkok, Thailand (2019-2023). Submissions were classified as research assistant (RA)-supported or non-supported. The primary outcomes were (1) receiving revision comments and (2) the number of unique revision comments during the initial IRB review cycle. Comments were categorized into administrative, ethical, methodological, and scientific domains. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression were performed, adjusting for investigator level, IRB review type, and year of submission. RA support was used in 324 submissions (91.0%) and 32 (9.0%) proceeded without RA support. RA support was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving revision comments (76.9% vs 93.8%; adjusted OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.82) and fewer comments per submission (median 2 vs 3; adjusted IRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.64). Reductions were primarily observed in administrative domains (39.8% vs 76.7%, p<0.001), with no significant differences in methodological, ethical, or scientific comments. The time to final approval did not differ between the groups. Organizational research support was associated with improved procedural readiness of IRB submissions, with fewer administrative deficiencies and no change in scientific review outcomes. Effects on scholarly engagement were not assessed and require prospective evaluation.
SN - 1179-7258
ER -