Examining Citizens’ Views on What Matters in the Allocation of Social Care Resources in the Netherlands
- 1Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam
Abstract
Background: Demographic ageing and increased longevity are driving demand for social care. In the Netherlands, local councillors and policy advisors face complex decisions about how to allocate scarce social care resources. While local decision-makers have considerable discretion, they remain accountable to citizens. A recent study examined their views on what matters in allocating social care resources. However, little is known about citizens’ views, even though such insight is important for ensuring legitimate and responsive decision-making.
Objective: To examine citizens’ views on what matters in the allocation of social care resources in the Netherlands.
Methods: We conducted a Q-methodology study with 24 citizens. Participants ranked 39 statements reflecting considerations underlying decisions on the allocation of social care resources. We used factor analysis followed by varimax rotation to identify clusters in the rankings. We interpreted the clusters as viewpoints using the resulting factor arrays and qualitative data from post-ranking interviews.
Results: We identified four distinct viewpoints, reflecting different value orientations: removing access barriers and autonomy; investing in social care; supporting income-based differentiation to ensure equal access; and balancing budget constraints with respect for autonomy. The viewpoints differed particularly regarding income-based differentiation, individual preferences and autonomy, and financial sustainability, while also showing agreement on several considerations.
Conclusions: Citizens have different views on what matters in the allocation of social care resources, indicating that there is no single perspective to guide these decisions. At the same time, areas of agreement provide common ground that may support legitimate and responsive decision-making.
Related
- A scoping review of the present condition of organ donation among Chinese citizens and its influencing factors
- When cancer screening meets research: interviews on engaging European underserved citizens
- Results from a peer recovery coach-delivered future orientation intervention for returning citizens in substance use treatment: feasibility and preliminary outcomes
- Parental preferences for risk communication during pediatric infectious disease outbreaks: a mixed-methods study from the netherlands
- District-level analysis of temperature-related excess mortality in the Netherlands
BibTeX
@article{stikkelbroeck2026examining,
title = {{Examining Citizens’ Views on What Matters in the Allocation of Social Care Resources in the Netherlands}},
author = {Sanne C. Stikkelbroeck and Philipa P. M. Mos and Vivian T. Reckers-Droog},
journal = {Journal of Long-Term Care},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31389/jltc.585},
url = {https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.585},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Examining Citizens’ Views on What Matters in the Allocation of Social Care Resources in the Netherlands
AU - Sanne C. Stikkelbroeck
AU - Philipa P. M. Mos
AU - Vivian T. Reckers-Droog
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of Long-Term Care
DO - 10.31389/jltc.585
UR - https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.585
AB - Background: Demographic ageing and increased longevity are driving demand for social care. In the Netherlands, local councillors and policy advisors face complex decisions about how to allocate scarce social care resources. While local decision-makers have considerable discretion, they remain accountable to citizens. A recent study examined their views on what matters in allocating social care resources. However, little is known about citizens’ views, even though such insight is important for ensuring legitimate and responsive decision-making. Objective: To examine citizens’ views on what matters in the allocation of social care resources in the Netherlands. Methods: We conducted a Q-methodology study with 24 citizens. Participants ranked 39 statements reflecting considerations underlying decisions on the allocation of social care resources. We used factor analysis followed by varimax rotation to identify clusters in the rankings. We interpreted the clusters as viewpoints using the resulting factor arrays and qualitative data from post-ranking interviews. Results: We identified four distinct viewpoints, reflecting different value orientations: removing access barriers and autonomy; investing in social care; supporting income-based differentiation to ensure equal access; and balancing budget constraints with respect for autonomy. The viewpoints differed particularly regarding income-based differentiation, individual preferences and autonomy, and financial sustainability, while also showing agreement on several considerations. Conclusions: Citizens have different views on what matters in the allocation of social care resources, indicating that there is no single perspective to guide these decisions. At the same time, areas of agreement provide common ground that may support legitimate and responsive decision-making.
SN - 2516-9122
ER -