Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Assessing ionospheric effects on image quality in the LOFAR Decametre Sky Survey

Abstract

The terrestrial ionosphere is a major limitation for high angular resolution imaging at decametre wavelengths. Its rapidly varying and direction-dependent phase errors can defocus sources, reduce recovered flux densities, and produce strong field-to-field variations in image quality. We investigate these effects using three overlapping pointings from the LOFAR Decametre Sky Survey (LoDeSS), observed under different ionospheric conditions. Using phase-calibration solutions on a bright source, we derive the spatial diffractive scale, the temporal decorrelation time, and the angular scale over which direction-dependent calibration solutions can be transferred before residual phase errors become significant. These metrics are reflected in the final image quality. The field with the weakest ionospheric phase structure has the sharpest compact sources and the most reliable flux-density scale, while the field with the strongest phase structure shows substantial source broadening and flux-density loss. The comparison indicates that spatial ionospheric structure is the dominant limitation in these observations. Calibration-derived ionospheric metrics, therefore, provide a practical way to diagnose and predict image-quality variations in decametre survey data.

Versions

Related

  1. The LOFAR Decametre Sky Survey (LoDeSS) I. Survey description and first data release
    C. M. Cordun, C. Groeneveld, H. W. Edler +12
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. A Cassini/CAPS Survey of Ionospheric Outflow at Saturn and Its Internal and External Drivers
    M. Felici, L. C. Ray, S. V. Badman +11
    The Planetary Science JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsIOP/AASCrossref
  3. On the altitude profile of lower ionospheric D-region response time delay during solar flares
    Sayak Chakraborty, Rakhi Paul, Tamal Basak
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPlanetary science & exoplanetsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  4. Temporal Correlation between Ionospheric Storm-Enhanced Density Plume and Plasmaspheric Plume Occurrence
    Xiangning Chu, Shunrong Zhang, Jacob Bortnik +5
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textSolar & stellar physicsGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
  5. An autonomous approach to model daytime behavior of sub-ionospheric VLF signals over short and medium propagation paths in India
    Sayak Chakraborty, Tamal Basak, Sourav Palit +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPlanetary science & exoplanetsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{cordun2026assessing,
  title = {{Assessing ionospheric effects on image quality in the LOFAR Decametre Sky Survey}},
  author = {Cristina-Maria Cordun and Harish K. Vedantham and Maaijke Mevius},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.17382},
  eprint = {2609.17382},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17382},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Assessing ionospheric effects on image quality in the LOFAR Decametre Sky Survey
AU  - Cristina-Maria Cordun
AU  - Harish K. Vedantham
AU  - Maaijke Mevius
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.17382
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17382
AB  - The terrestrial ionosphere is a major limitation for high angular resolution imaging at decametre wavelengths. Its rapidly varying and direction-dependent phase errors can defocus sources, reduce recovered flux densities, and produce strong field-to-field variations in image quality. We investigate these effects using three overlapping pointings from the LOFAR Decametre Sky Survey (LoDeSS), observed under different ionospheric conditions. Using phase-calibration solutions on a bright source, we derive the spatial diffractive scale, the temporal decorrelation time, and the angular scale over which direction-dependent calibration solutions can be transferred before residual phase errors become significant. These metrics are reflected in the final image quality. The field with the weakest ionospheric phase structure has the sharpest compact sources and the most reliable flux-density scale, while the field with the strongest phase structure shows substantial source broadening and flux-density loss. The comparison indicates that spatial ionospheric structure is the dominant limitation in these observations. Calibration-derived ionospheric metrics, therefore, provide a practical way to diagnose and predict image-quality variations in decametre survey data.
ER  -