Mesostructure, Toolpaths and the Finite-Element Prediction Gap in the Flexural Response of Planar and Non-Planar Fused Filament Fabrication
- 1Mechanical Engineering Faculty in Slavonski Brod, University of Slavonski Brod, 35000 Slavonski Brod, Croatia
- 2Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Aviation and Aerospace University, Bangladesh, Lalmonirhat 5500, Bangladesh
Abstract
The flexural response of a fused filament fabrication (FFF) part depends on the polymer, on the mesostructure the toolpath builds from it, and on how that mesostructure is oriented to the bending load. This review examines these factors for polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) printed with planar and non-planar toolpaths, and how well finite-element models predict the result. Because the interlayer bond forms while the polymer cools, crystallinity, annealing, moisture, ageing and test temperature shift flexural strength and stiffness, in directions that differ between polymers and treatment windows. The toolpath is a primary mechanical variable, with effects that depend on the test conditions. Of 84 finite-element studies, 26 are compared quantitatively with a flexural experiment, 23 independently. Only 1 of those 26 treats curved-layer or non-planar deposition, and the shortfall lies in the small number of non-planar studies that predict a mechanical response, not in a lower standard of validation. None of the validated models makes the polymer constants depend on temperature, moisture or loading rate, or gives the bond between layers of one polymer its own interface law, leaving thermal, hygroscopic and time-dependent behaviour, with non-planar bending, as the clearest gaps.
Related
- Experimental investigation and multi-response design of FFF-printed PLA honeycomb sandwich panels for flexural performance and mass efficiency
- Machine learning-aided design of metallic mechanical metamaterials: fabrication-aware modelling, property prediction, and inverse design
- Prediction of the properties of sintered copper-graphite composites using response surface methodology
- Spatial Applicability of Fictitious Point Feedback for Frequency Response Prediction in Unidirectional Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Plates
- Evaluating Measurement Bias in Flexural Modulus of Orthotropic UHMWPE Fiber/Nano-Epoxy Composites: A Finite Element Study
BibTeX
@article{grgic2026mesostructure,
title = {{Mesostructure, Toolpaths and the Finite-Element Prediction Gap in the Flexural Response of Planar and Non-Planar Fused Filament Fabrication}},
author = {Ivan Grgić and Jubayer Ahmed Sajid and Jure Marijić and Mirko Karakašić},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/polym18202604},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2604},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Mesostructure, Toolpaths and the Finite-Element Prediction Gap in the Flexural Response of Planar and Non-Planar Fused Filament Fabrication
AU - Ivan Grgić
AU - Jubayer Ahmed Sajid
AU - Jure Marijić
AU - Mirko Karakašić
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18202604
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2604
AB - The flexural response of a fused filament fabrication (FFF) part depends on the polymer, on the mesostructure the toolpath builds from it, and on how that mesostructure is oriented to the bending load. This review examines these factors for polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) printed with planar and non-planar toolpaths, and how well finite-element models predict the result. Because the interlayer bond forms while the polymer cools, crystallinity, annealing, moisture, ageing and test temperature shift flexural strength and stiffness, in directions that differ between polymers and treatment windows. The toolpath is a primary mechanical variable, with effects that depend on the test conditions. Of 84 finite-element studies, 26 are compared quantitatively with a flexural experiment, 23 independently. Only 1 of those 26 treats curved-layer or non-planar deposition, and the shortfall lies in the small number of non-planar studies that predict a mechanical response, not in a lower standard of validation. None of the validated models makes the polymer constants depend on temperature, moisture or loading rate, or gives the bond between layers of one polymer its own interface law, leaving thermal, hygroscopic and time-dependent behaviour, with non-planar bending, as the clearest gaps.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -