Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cureus

Rapid First-Year Proximal Femoral Bone Loss After Traumatic Transfemoral Amputation and Its Partial Reversal With Sequential Romosozumab and Antiresorptive Therapy: A Case Report

  1. 1Orthopaedic Surgery, Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Center Central Hospital, Kobe, JPN
  2. 2Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Center Central Hospital, Kobe, JPN

Abstract

Lower limb amputation causes early loss of bone mineral density (BMD) in the residual limb, and the loss is greater after transfemoral than after transtibial amputation. Densitometry is nevertheless rarely performed after amputation, and no report has described pharmacological treatment of this bone loss. A 37-year-old man underwent right transfemoral amputation after a road traffic injury; a concomitant left femoral shaft fracture was treated with an intramedullary nail. He was admitted to our hospital five months after the injury for prosthetic fitting and gait training, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed for the first time at that point. Three months later, during intensive inpatient gait training with progressive weight bearing, BMD had decreased at every site, and the magnitude of the decrease was graded according to loading condition: 1.9% at the lumbar spine, 8.7% at the non-amputated femoral neck, 15.6% at the amputated femoral neck, and 20.1% at the amputated total hip. Romosozumab 210 mg monthly was administered for 12 months, from 9 to 20 months after amputation, followed by denosumab and then zoledronic acid. Over 33 months of sequential treatment, BMD increased at every site relative to the value at treatment initiation, by 32.6% at the lumbar spine and 33.2% at the amputated femoral neck, but recovery was incomplete: BMD at the amputated total hip remained 2.5% below the value recorded five months after amputation. No fracture occurred, and the patient remains in employment. Rapid proximal femoral bone loss can therefore progress after transfemoral amputation despite prosthetic gait training and daily prosthesis use. This is an uncontrolled observation in a single patient: fracture healing, continuing rehabilitation, and progressively increasing physical activity coincided with pharmacotherapy, and the increase in BMD cannot be attributed to the medication. Whether early and repeated densitometry after lower limb amputation identifies this decline while it remains treatable and whether treatment reduces fractures require prospective evaluation.

Related

  1. Floor-to-stand transition strategies observed in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation
    Yukihiko Mizuno, Ryota Morishima, Shio Katoh +2
    Frontiers in Rehabilitation SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJEurope PMC
  2. Traumatic transfemoral bowel evisceration following bull horn injury: a case report and review of literature
    Journal of surgical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Limb Salvage in Near-Total Traumatic Elbow Amputation with Bone Loss Using Spanning Titanium Elastic Nails: A Case Report.
    Ajmal Abdulla, Milind Deshpande, Dhairyasheel Udaysinh Patil +3
    Journal of orthopaedic case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Targeted muscle reinnervation after traumatic or elective upper-extremity amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan-Long Meng, Ji-Ling Li, Xin Xue +5
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Sequential management of traumatic breast hematoma with an anatomically evident flail segment: a case report
    Yoshitaka Ooya, Shuji Takahira
    Journal of Surgical Case ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{toda2026rapid,
  title = {{Rapid First-Year Proximal Femoral Bone Loss After Traumatic Transfemoral Amputation and Its Partial Reversal With Sequential Romosozumab and Antiresorptive Therapy: A Case Report}},
  author = {Mitsunori Toda and Takashi Oshima},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.116980},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116980},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Rapid First-Year Proximal Femoral Bone Loss After Traumatic Transfemoral Amputation and Its Partial Reversal With Sequential Romosozumab and Antiresorptive Therapy: A Case Report
AU  - Mitsunori Toda
AU  - Takashi Oshima
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.116980
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.116980
AB  - Lower limb amputation causes early loss of bone mineral density (BMD) in the residual limb, and the loss is greater after transfemoral than after transtibial amputation. Densitometry is nevertheless rarely performed after amputation, and no report has described pharmacological treatment of this bone loss. A 37-year-old man underwent right transfemoral amputation after a road traffic injury; a concomitant left femoral shaft fracture was treated with an intramedullary nail. He was admitted to our hospital five months after the injury for prosthetic fitting and gait training, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed for the first time at that point. Three months later, during intensive inpatient gait training with progressive weight bearing, BMD had decreased at every site, and the magnitude of the decrease was graded according to loading condition: 1.9% at the lumbar spine, 8.7% at the non-amputated femoral neck, 15.6% at the amputated femoral neck, and 20.1% at the amputated total hip. Romosozumab 210 mg monthly was administered for 12 months, from 9 to 20 months after amputation, followed by denosumab and then zoledronic acid. Over 33 months of sequential treatment, BMD increased at every site relative to the value at treatment initiation, by 32.6% at the lumbar spine and 33.2% at the amputated femoral neck, but recovery was incomplete: BMD at the amputated total hip remained 2.5% below the value recorded five months after amputation. No fracture occurred, and the patient remains in employment. Rapid proximal femoral bone loss can therefore progress after transfemoral amputation despite prosthetic gait training and daily prosthesis use. This is an uncontrolled observation in a single patient: fracture healing, continuing rehabilitation, and progressively increasing physical activity coincided with pharmacotherapy, and the increase in BMD cannot be attributed to the medication. Whether early and repeated densitometry after lower limb amputation identifies this decline while it remains treatable and whether treatment reduces fractures require prospective evaluation.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -