Targeted muscle reinnervation after traumatic or elective upper-extremity amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shanghai Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
- 3Engineering Research Center for TCM Intelligent Rehabilitation, Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate functional recovery and prosthetic control following targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) or TMR-based reconstruction in patients with upper extremity amputation or severe brachial plexus injury.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting standardized functional outcomes before and after TMR. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Because most studies did not report the standard deviation of paired changes or within-participant correlations, preoperative and postoperative summary data were synthesized using mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) as exploratory estimates. Potentially overlapping cohorts were identified by comparing study centers, recruitment periods, authorship, and participant characteristics.
Results: Six eligible reports representing five independent patient cohorts were included. MINORS scores ranged from 9 to 12 out of 16, indicating important methodological limitations. Postoperative Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) scores improved significantly (MD = 31.45, 95% CI 6.69–56.21), although substantial heterogeneity was observed ( I ² = 83%). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores showed a significant reduction in self-reported disability after direction harmonization (MD = 21.91, 95% CI 10.85–32.97; I ² = 0%). A single study reported a significant improvement in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores (MD = 22.00, 95% CI 10.29–33.71), while another reported an increase in OPUS upper-extremity function scores (mean change = 2.7, 95% CI 2.3–3.2). Sensitivity analysis including combined TMR and osseointegration produced a similar DASH effect.
Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that TMR-based reconstruction may improve prosthetic task performance and perceived upper-limb function. However, the findings remain preliminary because of small samples, heterogeneous procedures, incomplete paired-data reporting, and the frequent use of TMR within multicomponent reconstructive programmes. Larger prospective multicenter studies using standardized functional outcomes are required.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251002627 , identifier (CRD420251002627).
Related
- Perioperative Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Case Report.
- Chronic Pain and Residual Limb Outcomes Following Primary Major Lower Extremity Amputation vs. Minor-to-Major Amputation Progression: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
- Clinical accuracy, information quality and readability of chatbot responses to patient questions about lower extremity amputation
- Predictive Value of Preoperative Inflammatory and Nutritional Indices for Revision Surgery After Major Lower Extremity Amputation in Patients With Wagner Stage 5 Diabetic Foot.
- Factors Associated with Major Versus Minor Lower Extremity Amputation in Hospitalized Patients with Diabetes in Saudi Arabia
BibTeX
@article{meng2026targeted,
title = {{Targeted muscle reinnervation after traumatic or elective upper-extremity amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
author = {Fan-Long Meng and Ji-Ling Li and Xin Xue and Jia-Jia Wu and Jie Ma and Yu-Xin Zheng and Mou-Xiong Zheng and Jian-Guang Xu},
journal = {Frontiers in Neurology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1946094},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1946094/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Targeted muscle reinnervation after traumatic or elective upper-extremity amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Fan-Long Meng
AU - Ji-Ling Li
AU - Xin Xue
AU - Jia-Jia Wu
AU - Jie Ma
AU - Yu-Xin Zheng
AU - Mou-Xiong Zheng
AU - Jian-Guang Xu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1946094
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1946094/full
AB - Objective: To systematically evaluate functional recovery and prosthetic control following targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) or TMR-based reconstruction in patients with upper extremity amputation or severe brachial plexus injury. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting standardized functional outcomes before and after TMR. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Because most studies did not report the standard deviation of paired changes or within-participant correlations, preoperative and postoperative summary data were synthesized using mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) as exploratory estimates. Potentially overlapping cohorts were identified by comparing study centers, recruitment periods, authorship, and participant characteristics. Results: Six eligible reports representing five independent patient cohorts were included. MINORS scores ranged from 9 to 12 out of 16, indicating important methodological limitations. Postoperative Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) scores improved significantly (MD = 31.45, 95% CI 6.69–56.21), although substantial heterogeneity was observed ( I ² = 83%). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores showed a significant reduction in self-reported disability after direction harmonization (MD = 21.91, 95% CI 10.85–32.97; I ² = 0%). A single study reported a significant improvement in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores (MD = 22.00, 95% CI 10.29–33.71), while another reported an increase in OPUS upper-extremity function scores (mean change = 2.7, 95% CI 2.3–3.2). Sensitivity analysis including combined TMR and osseointegration produced a similar DASH effect. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that TMR-based reconstruction may improve prosthetic task performance and perceived upper-limb function. However, the findings remain preliminary because of small samples, heterogeneous procedures, incomplete paired-data reporting, and the frequent use of TMR within multicomponent reconstructive programmes. Larger prospective multicenter studies using standardized functional outcomes are required. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251002627 , identifier (CRD420251002627).
SN - 1664-2295
ER -