Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCBiology methods & protocols

Comparison of cardiometabolic benefits and tolerability in patients on sustained low doses of semaglutide or tirzepatide.

  1. 1nference Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.
  2. 2Metabolism Agentic Intelligence Atlas (MAIA), Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.

Abstract

Semaglutide and tirzepatide are typically evaluated through dose escalation, yet many patients in routine care do not reach a recommended maintenance dose due to tolerability, access, cost, supply, or individualized goals. Here, we used repeated 0.25 mg only semaglutide and 2.5 mg only tirzepatide prescription records as real-world proxies for sustained treatment at the lowest approved dose, a prescribing pattern that may overlap with, but does not establish, intentional microdosing. We analyzed de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) from a federated system of 29 million patients. Among 490 072 semaglutide-treated patients, 814 met the stringent sustained low-dose criterion of at least three distinct 0.25-mg prescriptions spanning at least 6 months from the first to the last qualifying prescription and among 322 442 tirzepatide-treated patients, 1016 met the analogous criterion of at least three distinct 2.5-mg prescriptions spanning at least 6 months. In a matched head-to-head comparison aided by AI-enabled curation of clinical notes, sustained low-dose tirzepatide showed higher 24-month adverse event rates (P < .05) than sustained low-dose semaglutide for constipation (32.6% vs. 22.4%), acute kidney injury (2.7% vs. 0.4%), muscle cramps (8.3% vs. 4%), lumbar disc disease (3.3% vs. 0.3%), dyspnea on exertion (9.6% vs. 6.8%), lentigo (4.7% vs. 0.8%), and actinic keratosis (3.3% vs. 0.6%), whereas sustained low-dose semaglutide (vs. tirzepatide) had higher rates of including otitis (5.6% vs. 2.1%), diaphoresis (5.5% vs. 3.2%), and ankle swelling (6.9% vs. 3.7%). Sustained low-dose tirzepatide was associated with greater weight loss than semaglutide (mean 12-month percent weight change -5.5% vs. -2.2%; P < .05 at all timepoints). Analyses of prescription patterns supported the findings from clinical notes. For example, renal-supportive and hyperkalemia therapies increased after low-dose tirzepatide (5.6% to 9.5% at 12 months, P = .016) but not after low-dose semaglutide (8.2% to 6.6%, P = .382). Taken together, these observational associations motivate prospective studies to better characterize the outcomes and pharmacology of sustained initiation-dose semaglutide or tirzepatide, and related microdosing studies.

Related

  1. Biliary and Pancreatic Safety of Incretin-Based Therapies in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Propensity-Matched Real-World Comparison of Tirzepatide, Semaglutide, and DPP-4 Inhibitors
    Wissam Ghusn, Sasha-Jane Abi-Aad, Maria Daniela Hurtado
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated with Semaglutide, Liraglutide and Tirzepatide: A Systematic Review
    Aditya K. Gupta, Elizabeth M. Teasell, Renata F. Magalhães +2
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Atypical Anorexia Nervosa Developed in a Patient with Severe Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Following Sleeve Gastrectomy and Postoperative Treatment with Semaglutide and Tirzepatide
    Chiaki Saito, Masahiro Saito, Masatoshi Nakagawa +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthJ-STAGE
  4. Changes in Eating Behavior and Food Preferences After Semaglutide or Tirzepatide Initiation: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study
    Elisabetta Camajani, Francesco Frigerio, Chiara Quattrini +7
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  5. Cardiometabolic therapy for rhythm control: a case report of refractory atrial fibrillation resolving after initiation of semaglutide for obesity
    European heart journal. Case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{murugadoss2026comparison,
  title = {{Comparison of cardiometabolic benefits and tolerability in patients on sustained low doses of semaglutide or tirzepatide.}},
  author = {Karthik Murugadoss and A J Venkatakrishnan and Venky Soundararajan},
  journal = {Biology methods \& protocols},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1093/biomethods/bpag048},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42857675},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of cardiometabolic benefits and tolerability in patients on sustained low doses of semaglutide or tirzepatide.
AU  - Karthik Murugadoss
AU  - A J Venkatakrishnan
AU  - Venky Soundararajan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
JO  - Biology methods & protocols
DO  - 10.1093/biomethods/bpag048
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42857675
AB  - Semaglutide and tirzepatide are typically evaluated through dose escalation, yet many patients in routine care do not reach a recommended maintenance dose due to tolerability, access, cost, supply, or individualized goals. Here, we used repeated 0.25 mg only semaglutide and 2.5 mg only tirzepatide prescription records as real-world proxies for sustained treatment at the lowest approved dose, a prescribing pattern that may overlap with, but does not establish, intentional microdosing. We analyzed de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) from a federated system of 29 million patients. Among 490 072 semaglutide-treated patients, 814 met the stringent sustained low-dose criterion of at least three distinct 0.25-mg prescriptions spanning at least 6 months from the first to the last qualifying prescription and among 322 442 tirzepatide-treated patients, 1016 met the analogous criterion of at least three distinct 2.5-mg prescriptions spanning at least 6 months. In a matched head-to-head comparison aided by AI-enabled curation of clinical notes, sustained low-dose tirzepatide showed higher 24-month adverse event rates (P < .05) than sustained low-dose semaglutide for constipation (32.6% vs. 22.4%), acute kidney injury (2.7% vs. 0.4%), muscle cramps (8.3% vs. 4%), lumbar disc disease (3.3% vs. 0.3%), dyspnea on exertion (9.6% vs. 6.8%), lentigo (4.7% vs. 0.8%), and actinic keratosis (3.3% vs. 0.6%), whereas sustained low-dose semaglutide (vs. tirzepatide) had higher rates of including otitis (5.6% vs. 2.1%), diaphoresis (5.5% vs. 3.2%), and ankle swelling (6.9% vs. 3.7%). Sustained low-dose tirzepatide was associated with greater weight loss than semaglutide (mean 12-month percent weight change -5.5% vs. -2.2%; P < .05 at all timepoints). Analyses of prescription patterns supported the findings from clinical notes. For example, renal-supportive and hyperkalemia therapies increased after low-dose tirzepatide (5.6% to 9.5% at 12 months, P = .016) but not after low-dose semaglutide (8.2% to 6.6%, P = .382). Taken together, these observational associations motivate prospective studies to better characterize the outcomes and pharmacology of sustained initiation-dose semaglutide or tirzepatide, and related microdosing studies.
SN  - 2396-8923
ER  -